Recount Opinions

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Giantone

I have to ask, "If Trump takes that on by calling out the blatant bias it will hopefully keep those type shows a little more honest than they ever have been, or at the least highlight their bias more".........please explain?

There is no explaining, it is just words on top of words until we forget what the hell we were talking about. It is the same strategy that Trump has used since day one. Lol. Just keep talking and avoiding the pount and soon everyone will either be confused or forget what the point was.
The POTUS is arguing on Twitter with everyone who disagrees with him. That is all you really need to know. Impossible to believe people still do not see that this guy is mentally unfit to be potus. Impossible.
We are officially living in the Twilight Zone.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Giantone

I have to ask, "If Trump takes that on by calling out the blatant bias it will hopefully keep those type shows a little more honest than they ever have been, or at the least highlight their bias more".........please explain?

It's not that complicated. Throughout Bush2 and Pres. Obama's terms especially, the media, hard news and the secondary comedy faux news have consistently pursued a twofold strategy of putting the liberal elite on a pedestal, and attacking the leaders of any conservative movement. They have tried the same with Trump, but unlike others, he doesn't just take it, he responds, and points forces a discussion each time.

It's a lot like Reagan did with the media outlets that were available to him at the time.

edit: one other point, the more the hollywood elitists cry and whine, the more that they prove their disconnect. This is only going to hurt them in the end.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Just stop dude,....there has never been such a weak minded president before and hopefully there never will be again.

He's not weak-minded, in fact he plays the Twitter bully pulpit very effectively.

weak-mind·ed
adj. - lacking determination, emotional strength, or intellectual capacity.

If you think he lacks any of those you are misreading his public actions and intents.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

It's not that complicated. Throughout Bush2 and Pres. Obama's terms especially, the media, hard news and the secondary comedy faux news have consistently pursued a twofold strategy of putting the liberal elite on a pedestal, and attacking the leaders of any conservative movement. They have tried the same with Trump, but unlike others, he doesn't just take it, he responds, and points forces a discussion each time.



It's a lot like Reagan did with the media outlets that were available to him at the time.



edit: one other point, the more the hollywood elitists cry and whine, the more that they prove their disconnect. This is only going to hurt them in the end.

Wrong. It is not a matter of him not "taking it". If Some actor or actress lashed out at Obama, or Bush, or fucking George Washington I find it hard to believe it would bother them at all. Let alone to the point that they start tweeting about them being overrated! He is going to be the God damned POTUS! Fucking act like it!
Also, it is hardly the hollywood elitists, (Lol. So funny how Trumpers love to call them that as they applaud the Wall Street and Oil tycoons into the White house), that are thee only ones that can see this guy is insane. Again, most of our country and the free world agree. They just have a platform to make it known.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

He's not weak-minded, in fact he plays the Twitter bully pulpit very effectively.







If you think he lacks any of those you are misreading his public actions and intents.

Weak minded = being a grown man who gets his feelings hurt and cannot stand someone thinking he is not great so they take to social media to insult them. The way he handles criticism is tantamount to the way my 10 year old daughter handles being told no.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Wrong. It is not a matter of him not "taking it". If Some actor or actress lashed out at Obama, or Bush, or fucking George Washington I find it hard to believe it would bother them at all. Let alone to the point that they start tweeting about them being overrated! He is going to be the God damned POTUS! Fucking act like it!
Also, it is hardly the hollywood elitists, (Lol. So funny how Trumpers love to call them that as they applaud the Wall Street and Oil tycoons into the White house), that are thee only ones that can see this guy is insane. Again, most of our country and the free world agree. They just have a platform to make it known.

You put the presidents on a platform they don't belong. None of them were saints and most had plenty of ways, both public and private that they humiliated or brought down their opponents.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

You put the presidents on a platform they don't belong. None of them were saints and most had plenty of ways, both public and private that they humiliated or brought down their opponents.

I am not putting them on a platform. I know they all have their agendas. I know they are not saints. Trust me if I thought they were Bush would have been the last guy I mentioned. Lol
This has gone so far beyond anyone's affiliations though. Can you honestly tell me that you are comfortable with the potus tweeting about nuclear weapons and Meryl Streep being overrated in basically the same breath?
My God.
He is so all over the map, he is way too sensitive to criticism, and has skin as thick as an over filled water balloon. Just concentrate on doing your fucking job. He must have more pressing issues right now than tweeting about Meryl Streep. He must.

[MTK]

Trump is classless trash. He's a classic bully, loves to dish it out but he can't take it in return.

[CRedskinsRule]

1) It's not his "fucking job yet", and Pres Obama is making sure to use every possible day of his term to f*** up international relations.

2) No I don't care - again, I love seeing the tizzy libs get into over a tweet barrage. It makes me smile.

3) I still have yet to see any substantive policy plans from Trump's transition team that I would disagree with.

[MTK]

Nails it

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...=.5db9a113e2a7

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by MTK

Nails it



https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...=.5db9a113e2a7

Nothing there that anyone could possibly disagree with. Lol. Makes me smile.
Cue the twilight zone music.

[MTK]

He's insecure and weak, no doubt someone is going to play that against him. Putin already has him on a leash.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by MTK

He's insecure and weak, no doubt someone is going to play that against him. Putin already has him on a leash.

Putin has Trump on a leash, but he already whipped Obama with a stick.


Its so funny, at the first Democratic debate, a super stand-up dude and generally smart mutherfucker Jim Webb when asked what was our greatest threat nailed it:

COOPER: Secretary Clinton, the greatest national security threat?

CLINTON: I - I think it has to be continued threat from the spread of nuclear weapons, nuclear material that can fall into the wrong hands. I know the terrorists are constantly seeking it, and that's why we have to stay vigilant, but also united around the world to prevent that.

COOPER: Senator Sanders, greatest national security threat?

SANDERS: The scientific community is telling us that if we do not address the global crisis of climate change, transform our energy system away from fossil fuel to sustainable energy, the planet that we're going to be leaving our kids and our grandchildren may well not be habitable. That is a major crisis.

COOPER: Senator Webb?

WEBB: Our greatest long-term strategic challenge is our relation with China. Our greatest day-to-day threat is cyber warfare against this country. Our greatest military-operational threat is resolving the situations in the Middle East.



This man already knew it...why is it within the Obama administration has failed so miserably with this? Why isn't this country more prepared in defended itself from Russia and China and the cybersecurity threat? If there was any assist with the hacking issue, its from the current administration and the failed leadership to defend this country from outside threat.

LOL and poor Bernie's response...I mean, the poor guy means well, but the good lord.

So if the Russians influenced anything, then clearly they were allowed by a weak Obama Administration and a weak State department. Period.

[MTK]

Soon to be Trump's problem, good thing he's the best at the cyber.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

You put the presidents on a platform they don't belong. None of them were saints and most had plenty of ways, both public and private that they humiliated or brought down their opponents.

I put the Office on a platform and I expect the people who occupy that office to respect it ,very clear Trump does not .I understand you might not like my politics or I yours ,that is the way it works.Trump it's "fake news" with Reagan it was "dis-information" there is a big difference.Thanks to Trump now there is no news agency that is a good one unless they are pro Trump and that's BS.Hell he has wrecked the reputations of the CIA,FBI and NSA.All agree the Russians hacked the election/campaigns even Trump has had to come to the realization of it but not before he did damage to this country and the Office of the President.Hell not a super fan of Obama's but he and his family have been nothing but class in that office,Trump isn't even in it yet and he has tarnished it.Keep track of the promise's he breaks or doesn't keep.