|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-15-2006, 04:58 PM | #16 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alexandria, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 100
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Guys, stop feeding the troll!
|
Advertisements |
01-15-2006, 05:05 PM | #17 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Only a Cowgirls fan would try to talk trash to the team that kept them out of the playoffs. :smashfrea
|
01-15-2006, 05:09 PM | #18 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 783
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Quote:
|
|
01-15-2006, 05:39 PM | #19 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 36
Posts: 5,688
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Quote:
:confused- :confused: :confused- :confused: :confused- :confused: :confused- :confused: :confused- :confused: :confused- :confused: :confused- :confused: :confused- :confused: |
|
01-15-2006, 05:41 PM | #20 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 36
Posts: 5,688
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Just so you know second place is the first loser in a race. That is where that came from. Second place is actually the last loser in football. Stupid cowwhore fans. They need to grow brains. |
01-15-2006, 06:06 PM | #21 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 38
Posts: 16,867
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Quote:
Don't be bitter cause you lost. Take it like a man. lol This coming from a girl. Oh double spank!! You got owned this season. Get over it. |
|
01-15-2006, 06:18 PM | #22 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 922
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
I hate that a Cowboy's fan said this... but he is right...... 2nd place Is the 1st Loser!!!!!!!
And the Skins had a great season but they are sitting at home watching just like the Eagles and cowboys....but Seattle isn't!!!!!!!
__________________
Run or Pass and Score ..We Want Alot More!!!! |
01-15-2006, 06:40 PM | #23 |
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2004
Location: philippines
Age: 51
Posts: 184
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
we will own dallas for some more years unless parcells retires
ha ha ha dumbasss |
01-15-2006, 07:49 PM | #24 |
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Haha...Cowboys fans are funny..
__________________
Vacancy |
01-15-2006, 08:37 PM | #25 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: LaVale MD
Age: 62
Posts: 515
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Quote:
__________________
...skins fan since 72 and still breathin'! |
|
01-15-2006, 09:30 PM | #26 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Quote:
he's not right. just like bigskinbauer said "2nd place is the LAST loser" because all the other teams have already lost before the superbowl. thats why only two teams play the last game, to determine the champion and the last loser of the season. whats funny is that dallas not only lost twice to the skins but they also became losers two weeks before the skins became losers.
__________________
Hail to Allen/Shanahan .... bring in some baby hogs and load up on diesel fuel !!! (budw38) |
|
01-15-2006, 10:52 PM | #27 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ridgway, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 2,519
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Quote:
__________________
"I am the best at what I do, and what I do isn't very nice" - Sean Taylor |
|
01-15-2006, 11:02 PM | #28 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2005
Age: 36
Posts: 173
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Quote:
|
|
01-15-2006, 11:31 PM | #29 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Southeast
Age: 41
Posts: 2,119
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
Quote:
__________________
Your post count, reputation score, popularity ranking, VIP tag or funny signature has no bearing on how I value you as an individual. |
|
01-16-2006, 01:35 AM | #30 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Washington DC area
Posts: 215
|
Re: Second place is the first loser
HAHAHAHAH....
Let me just say that I was lmao when I read the replies. Some of you said that you don't care about my message, well apparently you do. The reason why I am posting a messages here is because one of my co-workers would brag about the team (the Deadskins) and make me read messages posted here and he kept telling me that I should get a user name and start posting messages. So, the suggestion that I do this came from a Redskins fan. Now, why did I wait this long to post a message. Well duhhhh, there is no secret to it, I had to wait for you guys to lose. Am I bitter? you bet ya. I am not trying to hide it at all, here it is just in case you haven't figured it out yet " I HATE THE REDSKINS". But I am not stupid like some the people who posted replies to my message. For instance, someone corrected me and said the second place is the "last loser". WOW, good for you. I guess you would know from all those time that you finished second you first loser, I am sorry I meant "LAST LOSER". Dallas has a very good D and it is only getting better, the Redskins have a great one. Next year it will be about improving the offense. Some of you talked about Dallas not having a QB, what about the Skins, you want to start Ramsey? Or how about Jason Campbell, no denying he is going to be a good QB, but not right now. Also you guys are struggling with your receivers just as much as we do (yours is worse because it is a one man show for now) so I don't see how you guys are in a better shape than us. Everyone says D wins championships, will look at you guys and look at Chicago and Tampa. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|