Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Weight Of Division Record

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-10-2006, 10:55 AM   #1
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 64
Posts: 10,672
Re: Weight Of Division Record

just win the games your supposed to and the tiebreakers dont matter.and by the way,good morning tmc
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 11:09 AM   #2
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
Re: Weight Of Division Record

Good morning to you sir.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 11:28 AM   #3
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
Re: Weight Of Division Record

Don't all teams in the division the same teams except for in 2 games? We lost our division last year because we lost to KC and/or Oakland and the Giants beat them. Seems fair to me.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 11:29 AM   #4
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
Re: Weight Of Division Record

Sorry Grillz, that reference is old unfortunately. If there's a hilarious name to call the other teams, we've all thought of it.

I always liked the OBGYants.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 12:13 PM   #5
warriorzpath
Registered User
 
warriorzpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,880
Re: Weight Of Division Record

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection
Sorry Grillz, that reference is old unfortunately. If there's a hilarious name to call the other teams, we've all thought of it.

I always liked the OBGYants.
The ones I like for the division teams are:
Gay-Ain'ts
Dall-Asses
E-Girls
warriorzpath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 11:30 AM   #6
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
Re: Weight Of Division Record

Damn, we all just gang-raped Grillz. LOL
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 11:44 AM   #7
ArtMonkDrillz
Franchise Player
 
ArtMonkDrillz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 8,029
Re: Weight Of Division Record

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection
Damn, we all just gang-raped Grillz. LOL
it's like juvie all over again . I knew I wasn't that clever.
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude
ArtMonkDrillz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 12:12 PM   #8
PSUSkinsFan21
The Starter
 
PSUSkinsFan21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Age: 49
Posts: 1,340
Re: Weight Of Division Record

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtMonkDrillz
it's like juvie all over again . I knew I wasn't that clever.
But you still came up with it on your own without seeing it anywhere, right? You didn't know it was already around, so you can feel good about that.
__________________
"Hail to the Redskins!" and "Fight on State!"
PSUSkinsFan21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 11:56 AM   #9
Daseal
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 8,341
Re: Weight Of Division Record

I agree with the above poster, pretty much everyone in our division plays the same teams, I like how it's setup now.
__________________
Best. Player. Available.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 12:14 PM   #10
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: Weight Of Division Record

It's fine as it is now... imagine having a division winner with less overall wins than the 2nd place team?? That would be a real head scratcher. With only 6 division games, it would place way too much emphasis on those games.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 12:45 PM   #11
ArtMonkDrillz
Franchise Player
 
ArtMonkDrillz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 8,029
Re: Weight Of Division Record

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
It's fine as it is now... imagine having a division winner with less overall wins than the 2nd place team?? That would be a real head scratcher. With only 6 division games, it would place way too much emphasis on those games.
But the way it is now, a team can go 10-6, losing all of their divisional games, and they could still win the division based on overall record. That makes no sense either, IMO.
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude
ArtMonkDrillz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 01:53 PM   #12
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: Weight Of Division Record

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtMonkDrillz
But the way it is now, a team can go 10-6, losing all of their divisional games, and they could still win the division based on overall record. That makes no sense either, IMO.
Of course that could happen, but chances are pretty slim.

Even if that did happen, I wouldn't have a problem with that vs. a team going 6-10 and winning the division.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 01:55 PM   #13
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
Re: Weight Of Division Record

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
It's fine as it is now... imagine having a division winner with less overall wins than the 2nd place team?? That would be a real head scratcher. With only 6 division games, it would place way too much emphasis on those games.
It would be a head scratcher no doubt, but I also believe that's based on the precedent that we KNOW that the divisional winner is also the one with the best record regardless. Hell, I'd be all for a tournament at the end of the season with the first seed playing the fourth. It would give us some more football at the end of the year.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 12:19 PM   #14
crlesh
Special Teams
 
crlesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Age: 50
Posts: 142
Re: Weight Of Division Record

I never advocated basing the championship soley on divisional record... rather wanted to see if others thought there was merit in giving some weight to divisional record as a separate entity.

Divisional rivalries might become overemphasized, however. Some good thoughts being thrown out.
crlesh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 12:42 PM   #15
BigSKINBauer
Pro Bowl
 
BigSKINBauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 38
Posts: 5,688
Re: Weight Of Division Record

no, i like the fact that we play the same teams as our competition outside of 2 games and it makes more than just 6 games important but those six are still extremely important because you can serve up a loss to someone.

I do think the season could be extended though. Add 1 more bye take away 2 pre season games and play 2 more games every year agaist 2 teams of the 6 that are not played in the conference. If 4 games could be added I would say play 1 full division in each conference and 1 game in the other 5 conferences plus 6 inside the division games being 8+6+6=20 games. ehhh, 20 might be to much but I would like 2 more games a year. The off season is just to long.
BigSKINBauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.18477 seconds with 10 queries