Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-10-2006, 10:00 AM   #16
VTSkins897
Impact Rookie
 
VTSkins897's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 890
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

the entire D as a whole is sucking.
VTSkins897 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-10-2006, 10:35 AM   #17
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,573
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by offiss View Post
Well it's disconsurting to see another draft pick we just had to have can't beat out Warrick Holdman, whether or not Holdman is playing up to par is irrelevant, we gave up picks to get Rocky, if he is incapable of beating Holdman than there is a problem with our ability to evaluate talent.
Williams has a history of bringing his rookie defenders along slowly, and with a vet who's playing well enough what's the rush? With the problems we have right now, tossing a rookie in the mix just might compound things.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2006, 10:42 AM   #18
BrunellMVP?
Impact Rookie
 
BrunellMVP?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 726
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

Anyone but Rogers! he could be the worst corner in the NFL right now...
bold statement...but has he done anything positive?
BrunellMVP? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2006, 10:48 AM   #19
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,573
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrunellMVP? View Post
Anyone but Rogers! he could be the worst corner in the NFL right now...
bold statement...but has he done anything positive?
There are plenty of guys that are far worse.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2006, 10:52 AM   #20
BrunellMVP?
Impact Rookie
 
BrunellMVP?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 726
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

are any as big a disappointment?
BrunellMVP? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2006, 11:09 AM   #21
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrunellMVP? View Post
are any as big a disappointment?
rumph, ahmad carrol, quentin jammer, pacman jones... shall i continue?
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2006, 11:19 AM   #22
JWsleep
Propane and propane accessories
 
JWsleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 55
Posts: 4,719
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

Rocky isn't the magic bullet. But I'd like him to get some time to get experience. I don't think Holdman has been bad this year--he's way better than last year, IMO. Doubt you'll see GW and co going to a rookie at LB. We'll see. GW has said nothing but good things about Rocky, but he's high on Holdman too.
__________________
Hail from Houston!
JWsleep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2006, 11:54 AM   #23
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

We just need 11 Ade Jimohs and we'd be set.
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2006, 12:23 PM   #24
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

im really surprised ade hasnt played more. i thought towards the end of last season he was turning into a legit nfl corner
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2006, 12:24 PM   #25
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

thatguy, any thoughts on jimoh? you usually have some dirt on the thought process
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2006, 01:53 PM   #26
Mauicruzer
Camp Scrub
 
Mauicruzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: maui
Posts: 15
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

Yes the D has been dissapointing this season so far.I would love to see some pressure from the line would help the whole unit. However you dont win too many games with 3 measly points
Mauicruzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2006, 03:05 PM   #27
#56fanatic
The Starter
 
#56fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 50
Posts: 1,801
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

well, somebody has to be blamed, I guess its Warrick Holdman. I think he sucks, always has. but, according to coaches he works hard, smart, in the right place. Well, what happens when the guy just flat out sucks. being in the right place isn't enought. the guy misses tackles, gets taken out of the plays to easily, is as slow as me. I say let Rocky play. cant get any worse.
#56fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2006, 03:07 PM   #28
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Williams has a history of bringing his rookie defenders along slowly, and with a vet who's playing well enough what's the rush? With the problems we have right now, tossing a rookie in the mix just might compound things.

I know, I just see rookie after rookie around the league on the field and contributing, and then see a guy who can't break through at weekside LB.

If Holdmans play has been adequet thats about it, I watched the rookie TE from Jacksonville truck him on the sideline allowing him about 4 extra yards late in the game as he ran right over the top of Holdman, I know those things are bound to happen to every player at some time during the season, it just makes you wonder why Rocky can't do a better job.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2006, 04:59 PM   #29
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25 View Post
thatguy, any thoughts on jimoh? you usually have some dirt on the thought process
he's not faster than rumph or wright. great special teamer, and while he looked okay in coverage last year, he still got beat a bit. I honestly don't think he could be much worse than what we're trotting out there right now though, and he was a LOT better last year than the previous two.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2006, 05:09 PM   #30
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

well, speed isnt getting wright and rumph anywhere. why not, at least, try the ade in some spots?
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.53461 seconds with 10 queries