![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
Quote:
The hogs up front have done a great job moving people off the ball in the run game, both this year and last, but as Campbell grows, I think we may have to start moving to a pass oriented blocking scheme, and might want to bring in some different linemen to do it. I'm not sure I'd bring Dock back next year. Also, when was the last time a lineman held on a run play? It always seems to be a reciever or TE getting called. But in pass protection, we get flags all the time with the front 5.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
Maybe I missed it but why wont the coaches let JC run out of a shotgun? It would give him more time to read the D and not have to worry about dropping back. Its these little things this coaching staff just does not do that makes me wonder about them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
Well I think they wanted to keep the D honest, and make them expect run. This way they could pass more effectively, but they should have thrown that plan out by the forth quarter.
__________________
Vacancy |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
Another point that most people here seem to miss is that Betts and Sellers seem to whiff their blocks when they are suppose to protect JC. I think JC got pressured even more because Portis was a great blocker, much better than Betts.
The Redskins are nothing without Portis. I still can't believe people want him out of here.
__________________
Vacancy |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 43
Posts: 890
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
Agreed.
Too many offensive woes and not enough offensive WHOAS! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 64
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
campbells drops in the pocket are what he has practiced. the only difference is the line isnt blocking. im ready to go back to max protection and 2 wide receiver routes
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 51
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
Quote:
Campbell had some time on plays and missed. It's no big deal, it's to be expected. Let's not throw the OL under the bus. They weren't that bad. Campbell showed some sparks that have been missing. I think he'll be good next year when has the rest of this season to learn, and all the offseason to learn the books and take the snaps under center during practice / preseason. Campbell has the intangibles that we've been looking for. Just be patient guys. The best way to look at it is "our season is done", as soon as we all come to grips with that, the better we can see what we need and who is showing sparks of greatness. When we lost our 7th game, I had the mental mindset that the season was over. It's easier to see the team for what they are. Beleive it or not, we're not that far away from being a superbowl caliber team. Time and a couple key free agents will be the answer. CB and Kicker should be our area of focus for the free agents, then get a quality draft. The rest will come together. We were too optimistic to beleive that we could succeed with a new offensive system and a lot of injuries on the defensive side of the ball and no depth.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 922
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
I know our coach was always yelling....get ur butt down before you catch a cold...
__________________
Run or Pass and Score ..We Want Alot More!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
Cutler has to do the same thing in Denver with Tom Nalen. Nalen also sets up pretty low.
Not sure what you can do about it. Do you really want the center to change his stance? Rabach is on the tall side for a center (6-4), so I'm sure the main reason his stance is low is for leverage purposes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Dumfries, VA
Age: 73
Posts: 241
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
At the risk of being branded a Redskins heretic, JC is still a project. I hope he develops into a hall of fame quarterback for the Redskins; however, he is not playing well now.
We can list all the excuses for this that might make us feel better, but the bottom line is that we have a novice NFL QB that is not rocking the NFL world right now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PG county
Posts: 32
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
If the ran a couple of screens ATL would of had to calm down on there blitzes. When I say screen passes I'm talking about screens to the RB.
__________________
Check out www.demskins.com. A skins blog for the true skins fan! |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 42
Posts: 937
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
Yeah, not sure why we didnt run screens or that quick slant once they started blitzing
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
I know we tried one screen that just looked horrible from the get go, but I think it might have been a screen to Mike Sellers or Cooley and not Betts. I can't remember though.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 42
Posts: 937
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
The playaction was really slowing the development of the plays, and with their all out blitzing scheme, the PA shoulda been thrown out the window in the second half.
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|