Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Changes at RB for 2007

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-17-2006, 06:08 PM   #1
skins052bgr8
Special Teams
 
skins052bgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Richmond, Va.
Age: 51
Posts: 288
Re: Changes at RB for 2007

The combination did not look that well this year due to the injuries to Portis and the lack of prolonged drives at the beginning of the season. The way the playcalling is shaping up and hopefully the continous development of Campbell the offense will sustain more drives in each game and in turn give both backs plenty of touches.
skins052bgr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006, 06:12 PM   #2
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: Changes at RB for 2007

Betts is obviously happy with whatever role he has in Washington. He just wants to be a Redskin and signing that 5 year deal proved as such. While saying that, I can't help but to feel Betts' role will greatly increase next year. Let us not forget that when Gibbs had his championship teams, he always carried at least two running backs that could start for any team in the league.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006, 06:51 PM   #3
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
Re: Changes at RB for 2007

FOX had a stat that I just barely caught -- something about Betts being the only running back in Redskins history with as many rushing yards over three straight games? Anyone else hear that?
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006, 06:54 PM   #4
BeastsoftheNFCeast
Special Teams
 
BeastsoftheNFCeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 331
Re: Changes at RB for 2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
FOX had a stat that I just barely caught -- something about Betts being the only running back in Redskins history with as many rushing yards over three straight games? Anyone else hear that?
Yea I heard it, it surprised me too
BeastsoftheNFCeast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006, 08:32 PM   #5
SouperMeister
Playmaker
 
SouperMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 62
Posts: 3,419
Re: Changes at RB for 2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
FOX had a stat that I just barely caught -- something about Betts being the only running back in Redskins history with as many rushing yards over three straight games? Anyone else hear that?
Fox pointed out that Betts was the first Washington running back to ever have back-to-back 150+ yard rushing games.
SouperMeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006, 06:53 PM   #6
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
Re: Changes at RB for 2007

Betts now has 933 yards rushing on the season, he should easily crack 1000 now barring injury. He's had a heck of a season!
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006, 06:58 PM   #7
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
Re: Changes at RB for 2007

Wouldn't it be something to see both Portis and Betts go over 1000 yards next season?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the last time that happened was for the Browns in '85 -- Earnest Byner and Kevin Mack.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006, 07:09 PM   #8
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
Re: Changes at RB for 2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
Wouldn't it be something to see both Portis and Betts go over 1000 yards next season?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the last time that happened was for the Browns in '85 -- Earnest Byner and Kevin Mack.
Yeah that was the last time, but it's probably going to happen this year with Vick and Dunn.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006, 07:01 PM   #9
Gmanc711
Thank You, Sean.
 
Gmanc711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 7,506
Re: Changes at RB for 2007

A) Portis has very little trade value ( i'd say a low 2nd at best)

B) He would have ran for another 200 yards more than Betts in these three weeks (holes have been HUGE) and thats nothing against Betts because I love the man.

C) It'd be stupid. If we go into next year with Rock Cartwright and Ladell Betts as our 1/2 punch (and trust me I love both these guys) were in deep shit.

I fully expect to see Portis get about 20 carries a game, Betts 15. If we shop Porits, were in big trouble.
__________________
#21
Gmanc711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006, 07:19 PM   #10
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 10,069
Re: Changes at RB for 2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gmanc711 View Post
A) Portis has very little trade value ( i'd say a low 2nd at best)
Not that I would trade him but where did you get that idea from? His contract is hard to swallow but the man is worth a lot more than a 2nd round pick. And last time I checked he is 26 and in his prime.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006, 07:05 PM   #11
drew54
The Starter
 
drew54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: IOWA
Age: 43
Posts: 1,324
Re: Changes at RB for 2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskinhog1963 View Post
jacksonville,atlanta,or maybe even the dolphins?
Jacksonville - Jones Drew
Atlanta - Dunn/Norwood
Miami - Brown

Any other teams you can think of that need a running back, how about the Saints, they could use running backs.
__________________
No pressure, no diamonds.
drew54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006, 07:08 PM   #12
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
Re: Changes at RB for 2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by drew54 View Post
Jacksonville - Jones Drew
Atlanta - Dunn/Norwood
Miami - Brown

Any other teams you can think of that need a running back, how about the Saints, they could use running backs.
Yeah, how 'bout the Chargers? They're really hurting for RBs.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006, 07:18 PM   #13
hesscl34
Registered User
 
hesscl34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
Re: Changes at RB for 2007

I cannot image Portis not being a Redskin. If he goes, what about Moss (his best friend), and Taylor? They are all very close. I don't even want to think about it.
hesscl34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006, 07:46 PM   #14
skins052bgr8
Special Teams
 
skins052bgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Richmond, Va.
Age: 51
Posts: 288
Re: Changes at RB for 2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by hesscl34 View Post
I cannot image Portis not being a Redskin. If he goes, what about Moss (his best friend), and Taylor? They are all very close. I don't even want to think about it.
I think you have a point in this, not that Portis is in my view is in danger of being traded. The business side of the house and managing the cap plays a role, but the most damaging thing since most players love Portis and what he brings to the team with Skills, leadership, character, and annointed Mr. Redskin by most fans. That would be really damaging to what I see as the Redskins keeping core players together and building it around your playmakers. Especially with the comfort that the two backs have working together it is not selfish with these two.
skins052bgr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006, 08:38 PM   #15
SouperMeister
Playmaker
 
SouperMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 62
Posts: 3,419
Re: Changes at RB for 2007

Quote:
Originally Posted by hesscl34 View Post
I cannot image Portis not being a Redskin. If he goes, what about Moss (his best friend), and Taylor? They are all very close. I don't even want to think about it.
Portis is going nowhere. Throughout all of Gibbs 1.0 glory, we always had two very capable running backs (Riggins/Joe Washington, Riggins/ George Rogers, Rogers/Timmy Smith, Byner/Riggs, Byner/Ervins/Riggs). Remember, both Portis and Betts have each had their share of injuries, so sharing the load should only help. Gibbs should do the right thing and push to give Derrick Dockery a new contract before he becomes a free agent in March. The O-line has been mauling defenses for the past 4 games, and Gibbs should make it a priority to keep them together instead of spending on another glitzy free agent.
SouperMeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.52895 seconds with 10 queries