Trade Value...

dmek25 · 02-25-2007, 11:29 AM

no, no, and more no. i think the skins have been pretty free of troublemakers since old #56 left. what was his name anyway?

davy · 02-25-2007, 01:07 PM

Surely it was Inky, Blinky, Pinky and Clyde?

skinsfan69 · 02-25-2007, 03:11 PM

Let the Raiders take him.

GoSkins! · 02-25-2007, 03:31 PM

No way, unless we also bring back Smoot... and then they should only be in charge of the parties. (metal detectors required).

skinsfan_nn · 02-25-2007, 03:51 PM

NO WAY IN HECK! THIS FREAK BELONGS BEHIND BARS! Maybe him and TANK will be cell mates.

12thMan · 02-25-2007, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

Let the Raiders take him.

Ah...don't be suprised.

skinsfan_nn · 02-25-2007, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12thMan

Ah...don't be suprised.

Never Happen! NOT ON ANY JOE GIBBS FOOTBALL TEAM, PERIOD

freddyg12 · 02-25-2007, 04:55 PM

If the price is reasonable, e.g. 3rd rnd. pick, I think we'd at least think about it, not that vinny & Danny are reasonable!
I agree that he's not a "Gibbs guy" as someone posted, so ultimately I don't see it happening. Just keep in mind though that Gibbs wants to win badly & is running out of time. Gibbs might also feel that he could sit him down & tell him what's expected of him, maybe even making a deal contingent upon him adding incentives to his contract. Ordinarily that sounds out of the question, but this guy's name is dirt right now & nfl teams are becoming weary of problem players.
I actually wanted us to draft Pacman in 05 but he was gone by our pick. He's a great player that is just starting to come into his own. Unfortunately he may lack discipline AND enough brains to keep out of the headlines.
In his defense, I've never read anything about him being a bad teamate a la TO. Anyone have any info in that regard?

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 02-25-2007, 05:03 PM

I wouldn't take him if the Titans gave US a third rounder.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 02-25-2007, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sportscurmudgeon

Here's another reason why "character matters"...

I love it when people say that character doesn't count....listen up Marvin Lewis disciples.

MTK · 02-25-2007, 05:10 PM

I wouldn't trade Archuleta for him.

Longtimefan · 02-25-2007, 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sportscurmudgeon

A friend of mine is in Indy covering the Combine. It's his job. :cool-smil

I just talked to him on the phone and he said that Pacman Jones is definitely avalailable and the price to get him is dropping like a rock.

He said that the Giants were offered Jones earlier today (and Lord knows the Giants need help in the secondary) for a 2nd round pick this year and a third next year. The Giants said no.

Later, he said, after other teams had passed on any similar deals for Jones, the Giants were offered Jones for a 3rd round pick this year and a "conditional fifth" next year. The Giants still said no.

Pacman was a high pick in the first round not all that long ago. Talk about plummeting value...

Here's another reason why "character matters"...

Demonstrates just how much the Giants value their draft picks. Be nice for us to take note.

Daseal · 02-25-2007, 06:28 PM

If we could get him for something very cheap, I'd be interested. He'd be forced into signing a contract that would be very Redskin friendly. If he ****s up, he's gone within the hour and the skins take a minimal/no cap hit.

SmootSmack · 02-25-2007, 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daseal

If we could get him for something very cheap, I'd be interested. He'd be forced into signing a contract that would be very Redskin friendly. If he ****s up, he's gone within the hour and the skins take a minimal/no cap hit.

The only problem there is that we're giving up a potential roster space for someone like say Dre Bly, for a ticking time bomb.

freddyg12 · 02-25-2007, 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

I wouldn't trade Archuleta for him.

Wow!that's saying a lot
I'd be willing to take that deal in a heartbeat, but for that matter I think about anything would could get for AA might be a bonus at this point.

I get your point though, this dude isn't worth the trouble. Can't argue w/that, but a part of me wants him to make a turnaround & if it is w/the skins we'd get the sweet end of the deal.
Don't be surprised to see JJ call on him to come to dallas.
Also hate to say it, but it occurred to me this week that Springs might be interested in dallas too since his dad played there. It doesn't sound good for us restructuring w/him, maybe that's why I'm a little more interested in this Pacman thread.

02-25-2007, 11:29 AM	#16
dmek25 MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: lancaster,pa Age: 63 Posts: 10,672	Re: Trade Value... no, no, and more no. i think the skins have been pretty free of troublemakers since old #56 left. what was his name anyway? __________________ "It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan

02-25-2007, 01:07 PM	#17
davy Impact Rookie Join Date: May 2004 Location: England Posts: 939	Re: Trade Value... Surely it was Inky, Blinky, Pinky and Clyde? __________________ “Don't ask me what I think of you, I might not give the answer that you want me to.”

02-25-2007, 03:11 PM	#18
skinsfan69 Living Legend Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Arlington, VA Posts: 17,341	Re: Trade Value... Let the Raiders take him.

02-25-2007, 03:31 PM	#19
GoSkins! The Starter Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Yorktown, Va Age: 55 Posts: 1,587	Re: Trade Value... No way, unless we also bring back Smoot... and then they should only be in charge of the parties. (metal detectors required). __________________ Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien

02-25-2007, 03:51 PM	#20
skinsfan_nn Playmaker Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Newport News,Virginia Age: 60 Posts: 4,495	Re: Trade Value... NO WAY IN HECK! THIS FREAK BELONGS BEHIND BARS! Maybe him and TANK will be cell mates. __________________ "There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68 THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE!

02-25-2007, 04:55 PM	#23
freddyg12 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 4,540	Re: Trade Value... If the price is reasonable, e.g. 3rd rnd. pick, I think we'd at least think about it, not that vinny & Danny are reasonable! I agree that he's not a "Gibbs guy" as someone posted, so ultimately I don't see it happening. Just keep in mind though that Gibbs wants to win badly & is running out of time. Gibbs might also feel that he could sit him down & tell him what's expected of him, maybe even making a deal contingent upon him adding incentives to his contract. Ordinarily that sounds out of the question, but this guy's name is dirt right now & nfl teams are becoming weary of problem players. I actually wanted us to draft Pacman in 05 but he was gone by our pick. He's a great player that is just starting to come into his own. Unfortunately he may lack discipline AND enough brains to keep out of the headlines. In his defense, I've never read anything about him being a bad teamate a la TO. Anyone have any info in that regard?

02-25-2007, 05:03 PM	#24
Sheriff Gonna Getcha Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 45 Posts: 8,317	Re: Trade Value... I wouldn't take him if the Titans gave US a third rounder.

02-25-2007, 05:10 PM	#26
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,573	Re: Trade Value... I wouldn't trade Archuleta for him. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

02-25-2007, 06:28 PM	#28
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 41 Posts: 8,341	Re: Trade Value... If we could get him for something very cheap, I'd be interested. He'd be forced into signing a contract that would be very Redskin friendly. If he **s up, he's gone within the hour and the skins take a minimal/no cap hit. __________________ Best. Player. Available.**

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Trade Value...

Locker Room Main Forum