![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 11
|
Re: Time for the Jets
I know the offensive line is missing two starters but can our offense be anymore boring? Im not just saying this because we got shalacked but other than Detriot what other game have we excelled on the offensive side of the ball? Were are our two running backs that some thought were the best tandem in the league? When do we start to point fingers at the coaches? Joe, Al?
__________________
Sean Taylor and LaRon Landry. HITMEN. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 152
|
Re: Time for the Jets
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Propane and propane accessories
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 57
Posts: 4,719
|
Re: Time for the Jets
Quote:
But whatever--we've got a winnable game (no gimme, though) that we have to find some way or other to take. The season depends on it, IMO.
__________________
Hail from Houston! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: Time for the Jets
I would be shocked if the Skins lost this game. It may not be an easy win but it will be a win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Time for the Jets
It will be interesting to see if Kellen Clemens provides a boost for the Jets. The Redskins need to win this game and I expect they will.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Time for the Jets
I am really wary about this game. Clemens comes in, and we don't have substancial film on him. Our offense has been struggling like mad and our defense has no scouting report on Clemens, and additionally we just got gashed bad in the run game.
I'd love to be proven wrong, but I'm taking the Jets in this one.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Time for the Jets
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Time for the Jets
Quote:
I'm also saying that they won't need a lot of points to have a late lead. It's probably a better situation than having to play Pennington, who would still have been playing for his job, but this is a very bad matchup for us against a not so great team.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Time for the Jets
The Jets needed to try something. Their season is sunk, time to toss the kid in and see what he can do. I'd much rather face a green Kellen Clemens vs. Chad Pennington.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 42
Posts: 937
|
Re: Time for the Jets
Agree or disagree, does anyone think this might be the week that we decide to open up the offense = throw on a down other than 3rd?????
I think we could really build campbell's confidence with some successful downfield throws against one of the the worst defenses in the NFL. Squeaking another one out is not gonna help us find ourselves. I guess the main question is.....did this beating wake up the staff?
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Time for the Jets
Some of you guys must not watch the games... Washington came out slinging on the first several drives yesterday. There were very few, if any, run, run, pass drives. Not calling pass plays, and being unable to execute the pass plays that are called are two completely different things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 42
Posts: 937
|
Re: Time for the Jets
Let's see
All the turnovers by Campbell were on third and longs. and yes. i watched us throw maybe one pass beyond the line of scrimmage to a receiver all game....and it was to James Thrash
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure Last edited by SmootSmack; 10-29-2007 at 03:16 PM. Reason: It's Thrash, not TRASH |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Time for the Jets
You're still incorrect, but you just made a completely different statement that your last post. You made it sound like Washington didn't pass at all on first and second down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 42
Posts: 937
|
Re: Time for the Jets
Your defending a bad offense that is one-dimensional. I wanted them to let JC throw downfield on first and second down against the Jets. And you argued and said I didnt watch the game???? We have no WR TD's, I'm sorry you love Al saunders....but he's 9-14
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Time for the Jets
Quote:
The gameplan itself isn't the problem, it's the execution, and the execution is being effected by a ridiculous number of injuries. How the hell can the finger be pointed at Al Saunders or even Coach Gibbs for that matter, when the entire offense outside of Cooley, Samuels, and Campbell have missed time, or been playing banged up? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|