Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Time for the Jets

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-29-2007, 01:01 PM   #1
Southtown15
Camp Scrub
 
Southtown15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 11
Re: Time for the Jets

I know the offensive line is missing two starters but can our offense be anymore boring? Im not just saying this because we got shalacked but other than Detriot what other game have we excelled on the offensive side of the ball? Were are our two running backs that some thought were the best tandem in the league? When do we start to point fingers at the coaches? Joe, Al?
__________________
Sean Taylor and LaRon Landry. HITMEN.
Southtown15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 01:33 PM   #2
skinsfan242
Special Teams
 
skinsfan242's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 152
Re: Time for the Jets

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southtown15 View Post
I know the offensive line is missing two starters but can our offense be anymore boring? Im not just saying this because we got shalacked but other than Detriot what other game have we excelled on the offensive side of the ball? Were are our two running backs that some thought were the best tandem in the league? When do we start to point fingers at the coaches? Joe, Al?
The more I think about it. Our best asset last year was Randy Thomas pulling behind Dockery and Samuels, or Dockery pulling behind Thomas and Jansen. I don't fault Kendall, he is playing well, but they don't pull him because our right side is so banged up. If somehow Thomas makes it back you will see a strong Oline once again. I don't like Wade starting but he will play better next to Thomas. Thomas should have been in the last few pro bowls and his loss is killing the teams identity. I'm not making excuses but It is apparent his loss means a whole lot and we need to step it up with him gone.
skinsfan242 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 01:46 PM   #3
JWsleep
Propane and propane accessories
 
JWsleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 57
Posts: 4,719
Re: Time for the Jets

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan242 View Post
The more I think about it. Our best asset last year was Randy Thomas pulling behind Dockery and Samuels, or Dockery pulling behind Thomas and Jansen. I don't fault Kendall, he is playing well, but they don't pull him because our right side is so banged up. If somehow Thomas makes it back you will see a strong Oline once again. I don't like Wade starting but he will play better next to Thomas. Thomas should have been in the last few pro bowls and his loss is killing the teams identity. I'm not making excuses but It is apparent his loss means a whole lot and we need to step it up with him gone.
Good post--I think this is a big deal. The loss of Thomas compounds the loss of Dockery--not because Dock was so great, but because Kendall can't run block that way. Thomas could pick up the slack by pulling--he's one of the best pulling guards around--but Fabini certainly can't. Look, without an offensive line that can dominate the line of scrimmage, it's hard to do anything on offense, as we've seen.

But whatever--we've got a winnable game (no gimme, though) that we have to find some way or other to take. The season depends on it, IMO.
__________________
Hail from Houston!
JWsleep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 02:28 PM   #4
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
Re: Time for the Jets

I would be shocked if the Skins lost this game. It may not be an easy win but it will be a win.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 02:36 PM   #5
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Time for the Jets

It will be interesting to see if Kellen Clemens provides a boost for the Jets. The Redskins need to win this game and I expect they will.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 02:47 PM   #6
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Time for the Jets

I am really wary about this game. Clemens comes in, and we don't have substancial film on him. Our offense has been struggling like mad and our defense has no scouting report on Clemens, and additionally we just got gashed bad in the run game.

I'd love to be proven wrong, but I'm taking the Jets in this one.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 02:54 PM   #7
Southpaw
The Starter
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
Re: Time for the Jets

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I am really wary about this game. Clemens comes in, and we don't have substancial film on him. Our offense has been struggling like mad and our defense has no scouting report on Clemens, and additionally we just got gashed bad in the run game.

I'd love to be proven wrong, but I'm taking the Jets in this one.
So basically, what you're saying is, Clemens will provide the spark the Jets need to win...
Southpaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 03:15 PM   #8
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Time for the Jets

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southpaw View Post
So basically, what you're saying is, Clemens will provide the spark the Jets need to win...
I'm saying we have run defending issues, and that if Clemens has to throw against us off playaction, we very easily could be caught out of position.

I'm also saying that they won't need a lot of points to have a late lead.

It's probably a better situation than having to play Pennington, who would still have been playing for his job, but this is a very bad matchup for us against a not so great team.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 02:55 PM   #9
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: Time for the Jets

The Jets needed to try something. Their season is sunk, time to toss the kid in and see what he can do. I'd much rather face a green Kellen Clemens vs. Chad Pennington.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 03:01 PM   #10
The Zimmermans
Impact Rookie
 
The Zimmermans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 42
Posts: 937
Re: Time for the Jets

Agree or disagree, does anyone think this might be the week that we decide to open up the offense = throw on a down other than 3rd?????

I think we could really build campbell's confidence with some successful downfield throws against one of the the worst defenses in the NFL. Squeaking another one out is not gonna help us find ourselves.

I guess the main question is.....did this beating wake up the staff?
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure
The Zimmermans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 03:05 PM   #11
Southpaw
The Starter
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
Re: Time for the Jets

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Zimmermans View Post
Agree or disagree, does anyone think this might be the week that we decide to open up the offense = throw on a down other than 3rd?????
Some of you guys must not watch the games... Washington came out slinging on the first several drives yesterday. There were very few, if any, run, run, pass drives. Not calling pass plays, and being unable to execute the pass plays that are called are two completely different things.
Southpaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 03:08 PM   #12
The Zimmermans
Impact Rookie
 
The Zimmermans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 42
Posts: 937
Re: Time for the Jets

Let's see

All the turnovers by Campbell were on third and longs. and yes. i watched us throw maybe one pass beyond the line of scrimmage to a receiver all game....and it was to James Thrash
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure

Last edited by SmootSmack; 10-29-2007 at 03:16 PM. Reason: It's Thrash, not TRASH
The Zimmermans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 03:15 PM   #13
Southpaw
The Starter
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
Re: Time for the Jets

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Zimmermans View Post
Let's see

All the turnovers by Campbell were on third and longs. and yes. i watched us throw maybe one pass beyond the line of scrimmage to a receiver all game....and it was to TRASH
You're still incorrect, but you just made a completely different statement that your last post. You made it sound like Washington didn't pass at all on first and second down.
Southpaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 03:18 PM   #14
The Zimmermans
Impact Rookie
 
The Zimmermans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 42
Posts: 937
Re: Time for the Jets

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southpaw View Post
You're still incorrect, but you just made a completely different statement that your last post. You made it sound like Washington didn't pass at all on first and second down.
Your defending a bad offense that is one-dimensional. I wanted them to let JC throw downfield on first and second down against the Jets. And you argued and said I didnt watch the game???? We have no WR TD's, I'm sorry you love Al saunders....but he's 9-14
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure
The Zimmermans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 03:38 PM   #15
Southpaw
The Starter
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
Re: Time for the Jets

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Zimmermans View Post
Your defending a bad offense that is one-dimensional. I wanted them to let JC throw downfield on first and second down against the Jets. And you argued and said I didnt watch the game???? We have no WR TD's, I'm sorry you love Al saunders....but he's 9-14
With 80% of the offensive line out or playing hurt, I actually think this team is zero dimensional, but I also respect the way the coaches were trying to attack the Patriots. They were trying to keep the Pats offense off the field with sustained drives. Going for quick strikes against that team is just stupid. Their offensive execution is far better than Washington's and they basically score whenever they feel like it.

The gameplan itself isn't the problem, it's the execution, and the execution is being effected by a ridiculous number of injuries. How the hell can the finger be pointed at Al Saunders or even Coach Gibbs for that matter, when the entire offense outside of Cooley, Samuels, and Campbell have missed time, or been playing banged up?
Southpaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.80076 seconds with 10 queries