Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Are We Better Off Without Moss?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-12-2007, 05:14 AM   #16
flashalexb
Camp Scrub
 
flashalexb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 95
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

That's the problem with having small recievers, they are more injury prone.
flashalexb is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 11-12-2007, 05:27 AM   #17
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

I don't know if we're better off without him, but the more comfortable Jason get's, I think he's less important to us, that's for sure. He seems like the type of guy that has to be 100% healthy to be effective. In other words, playing through injuries isn't his thing.

I think he's a Redskins next year for sure, but Jason is proving he doesn't need Moss on the field to get it done.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 09:18 AM   #18
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

For some reason it seems Moss and JC just can't get on the same page. Now that Moss has spent the better part of the last 2 seasons banged up, I really think the team might look in another direction this offseason. I love the guy and he's a big play WR when healthy, but we need a guy that's going to be on the field more often than not.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 09:33 AM   #19
rypper11
The Starter
 
rypper11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,228
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

I think Moss and ARE are too similar. Both are homerun hitters who will drop an easy pass occasionally or falter when less than 90%. They also provide the electrifying and game changing plays that SportsCenter was made for. When the two of them are your starters there is no possesion move the chains guy (save for Cooley who ends up having too often to block on 3rd down).
rypper11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 09:36 AM   #20
memphisskin
Impact Rookie
 
memphisskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Age: 53
Posts: 960
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

Injuries have derailed him this year, to start the year off him and Campbell were connecting on those deep balls, remember the 49 yard gem against the Giants? We knew before we traded for him, or at least we should have known, that he is a bit injury prone. But when healthy he is definitely a #1 WR, or have we forgotten he did make the Pro Bowl a couple years back?

I'm confused, how is Thrash's good game a black mark on Moss? That's like Bett's production last year reflecting poorly on Portis, and neither one make sense to me. These are good things, if anything when Moss gets healthy that means Thrash as the #3 wideout makes our offense even better, or am I missing the point?
memphisskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 09:38 AM   #21
#56fanatic
The Starter
 
#56fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 50
Posts: 1,801
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

no way. I think how much better our offense would be if they let Jason throw the ball like yesterday when Moss is in the game. The two games they let Jason throw the ball he has looked pretty damn good. Just so happened moss was hurt. When moss has been on the field, the game plan has just seemed more conservative. If the let Jason run the offense from a spread formation, moss, randel el, cooley, Lloyd (yes Lloyd!!) and spread the ball around it would be a dynamic offense.
#56fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 09:39 AM   #22
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

Ugh... enough with Lloyd already. Give it up the guy is a bum.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 09:47 AM   #23
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
For some reason it seems Moss and JC just can't get on the same page. Now that Moss has spent the better part of the last 2 seasons banged up, I really think the team might look in another direction this offseason. I love the guy and he's a big play WR when healthy, but we need a guy that's going to be on the field more often than not.
Was Moss banged up last year? One has to wonder if the "funk" he's in has more to do with the direction he sees this team heading in.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 09:50 AM   #24
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
Was Moss banged up last year? One has to wonder if the "funk" he's in has more to do with the direction he sees this team heading in.
Yeah he missed time last year with nagging injuries too
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 10:02 AM   #25
#56fanatic
The Starter
 
#56fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 50
Posts: 1,801
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Ugh... enough with Lloyd already. Give it up the guy is a bum.


LOL!! Call me crazy Matty but I still have a hard time thinking the kid can't catch the damn ball. If he isn't in the game he cant catch it, plus if he is getting one ball thrown to him every game, and that ball he get thrown to him is 5 yards over thrown, and he makes an all out effor diving and just goes of the tips, I dont see him making those catches. I have seen this guy play, he can play. he needs to be on the field when they go 3 or 4 wr.

Hell, McCardell caught some balls when they went 3 or 4 wide, even a damn TD. Lloyd can play, he just needs some PT and some balls thrown his way.

I did drink all day and all night yesterday, am I still feeling it??
#56fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 10:05 AM   #26
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

Quote:
Originally Posted by #56fanatic View Post
LOL!! Call me crazy Matty but I still have a hard time thinking the kid can't catch the damn ball. If he isn't in the game he cant catch it, plus if he is getting one ball thrown to him every game, and that ball he get thrown to him is 5 yards over thrown, and he makes an all out effor diving and just goes of the tips, I dont see him making those catches. I have seen this guy play, he can play. he needs to be on the field when they go 3 or 4 wr.

Hell, McCardell caught some balls when they went 3 or 4 wide, even a damn TD. Lloyd can play, he just needs some PT and some balls thrown his way.

I did drink all day and all night yesterday, am I still feeling it??
Yep, you're crazy.

If Lloyd could play he would be on the field more. That fact that the coaches trust McCardell who joined the team during the season more than Lloyd who's been here for 1.5 seasons now is very telling.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 10:58 AM   #27
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

Maybe JC looks more to Moss when he is in and gets lock onto him instead of looking him off when he is not open. When he is not in JC is looking the field over more and hitting the open guy.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 11:00 AM   #28
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
Maybe JC looks more to Moss when he is in and gets lock onto him instead of looking him off when he is not open. When he is not in JC is looking the field over more and hitting the open guy.
Essentially the point I was trying to make.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 11:13 AM   #29
Cowell
Impact Rookie
 
Cowell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bluffton, South Carolina
Posts: 803
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

I agree once again. I think that when Moss is in JC thinks that he MUST throw the ball to him, and he gets some tunnel vision. Moss and JC just can't seem to get a rhythm and get adjusted to each other and honestly if it hasn't happened by now I don't think there is much of a chance it will ever happen. I'm not sure if we are better off without Moss but it's starting to look that way.
Cowell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2007, 11:51 AM   #30
dgack
The Starter
 
dgack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The ATX (formerly Balmer)
Posts: 1,125
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
Yeah, you hate to basically write off this wideout lineup, but to me, this was the make or break year for the Moss/Lloyd/Randle El experiment.

This season, it's been an utter disaster. Since pass protection has generally been good, you can't put this one on offensive line injuries either. Maybe it's the development curve of Jason Campbell, but usually a team knows whether or not this combination of QB and receivers are going to work out. Year two should be when things begin to take off.

How ironic that after hearing that no wide receiver on the team has caught a touchdown yet, the one who finally does is way down the depth chart (and true to form for 2007, is probably gone for a long time due to injury).
By far and large it has been a disaster, but ARE has been pretty damned effective when he's been healthy. And let's not forget that he was stopped on the 1, what, 3 or 4 times? The whole "no TD's to WR" stat is a little misleading there, and if our goal line run game was the slam dunk it should have been, you'd be reading about how dominant our RB's are.

As I have been saying for some time, I do think something isn't right with Moss. Lloyd isn't even worth discussing because he's poison on and off the field. ARE is worth the money we paid him, IMO, and I don't want to see him go anywhere.
__________________
"To bring a Sherm Lewis in to a Jim Zorn and whoever his offensive coordinator is, it's like bringing in another man to help teach you how to make better love to your wife or something." -- Tre Johnson
dgack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.56872 seconds with 10 queries