![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: ESPN.com's Top RB Duos No Portis/Betts
no parker/mendenhall either?
no LT/(random warm body)? no dice. Last edited by That Guy; 06-03-2008 at 08:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: ESPN.com's Top RB Duos No Portis/Betts
You should read the entire article
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: ESPN.com's Top RB Duos No Portis/Betts
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 11
|
Re: ESPN.com's Top RB Duos No Portis/Betts
what's about Willie Parker and Rashard Mendenhal. These two guys are going to be a force for years to come.
Last edited by pigskinusa.com; 06-03-2008 at 10:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: ESPN.com's Top RB Duos No Portis/Betts
Quote:
I think Mendenhall will be a very good replacement for Parker in the future, and though they will split carries this year, it's hard to really call them a dynamic duo.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: ESPN.com's Top RB Duos No Portis/Betts
The next good thing about the Redskins Jeremy Green says will be the first. Let's revisit this list in November when it's actually based on production rather than speculation.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 2 Minutes away from Fedex Field, Maryland
Posts: 363
|
Re: ESPN.com's Top RB Duos No Portis/Betts
how are Barber and Jones on there?
But Portis and Betts didnt do anythng to prove that they are a good running back duo..BUT STILL, HOW ARE BARBER AND JONES ON THERE??? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 40
|
Re: ESPN.com's Top RB Duos No Portis/Betts
I can agree with you to a certain degree, because Jones hasn't done anything in the league yet. Betts weakened the Skins rank in this poll.
__________________
star wars |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: ESPN.com's Top RB Duos No Portis/Betts
julius jones and tj duckett?
wtf? betts is better than both of them, combined. Last edited by That Guy; 06-04-2008 at 01:03 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: ESPN.com's Top RB Duos No Portis/Betts
They're in the group of the worst 5 backs in the league IMO
Last edited by jdlea; 06-04-2008 at 09:09 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: ESPN.com's Top RB Duos No Portis/Betts
The writer is biased. No different then we are biased. but....I will say that it's funny that Portis/Betts has been name best duo for what the last 2-3 yrs in almost everyones opinion and he obviously thinks they are no longer a duo any more even though they still are #1 and #2 on our RB roster and still are doing the same jobs they have been doing for the past several yrs.
I think if I was a writer I would have to atleast use the top 5 duo's that show up every yr then start with the rookies who I think will make their mark even if it was a prediction of the 08 yr. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lake Travis, Texas
Age: 45
Posts: 786
|
Re: ESPN.com's Top RB Duos No Portis/Betts
what is the deal with espn, they make so much damn money and still charge people to read what their crappy writers have to say. oh well.
oh, and yeah, Ladell "no clutch bone in my body" Betts is not that good so this doesnt suprise me |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|