Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-30-2008, 07:21 AM   #1
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 64
Posts: 10,672
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I think it's just a product of the games being on the line all the time.

But ultimately, I agree with you. If we're going to struggle in the first quarter of every game anyway, might as well go three and out with Betts carrying the ball, and gradually move to Portis as the plays become more and more decisive.
this, and Betts consistantly putting the ball down. cant have it in close games( i.e. the 49er game)
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2008, 08:15 PM   #2
Warren85Ellard
Special Teams
 
Warren85Ellard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Reston,VA
Posts: 330
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Although Betts wasn't exactly bad in relief of Portis, it seems to be hard to find a situation where a team that isn't that great at running, like us in the 2nd half, can justify handing Betts the ball. He's too close to Portis. We don't have designed plays for Betts, because he's really just Portis lite. So a running play with Betts must seem like swallowing the bullet to Jim Zorn. We'll get Betts in the game a lot, but we're going to throw.

I'm not sure if that's the right call or not to change the run/pass ratio with Betts in, but it's certainly something we do.
Agreed. We need a lightning quick guy like Sproles or Norwood to contrast Portis. Someone like Joe Washington! Betts needs 20 carries a game to be effective.
Warren85Ellard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2008, 08:29 PM   #3
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren85Ellard View Post
Agreed. We need a lightning quick guy like Sproles or Norwood to contrast Portis. Someone like Joe Washington! Betts needs 20 carries a game to be effective.
I believe Sproles is a FA after this year... and he's a sick return man too. I'd be surprised if SD let him get away, but I would love to have him. Dude is the flash.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2008, 08:30 PM   #4
SeasonTicketHolder
Impact Rookie
 
SeasonTicketHolder's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 549
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
I believe Sproles is a FA after this year... and he's a sick return man too. I'd be surprised if SD let him get away, but I would love to have him. Dude is the flash.

We seem to be on the same page all the time, man.
__________________
Gonzaga College High School '04
Loyola College '08
SeasonTicketHolder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2008, 08:33 PM   #5
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeasonTicketHolder View Post
We seem to be on the same page all the time, man.
It's the Jesuit education.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2008, 08:51 AM   #6
SOUL-SKINS
Impact Rookie
 
SOUL-SKINS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 896
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
I believe Sproles is a FA after this year... and he's a sick return man too. I'd be surprised if SD let him get away, but I would love to have him. Dude is the flash.
Thanks for bringing up Sproles. I was afraid of getting blasted by everyone on the site. I've wanted Darren for a couple of years now. He's the best screen pass runner in the NFL. Which is perfect for the west coast offense.
SOUL-SKINS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2008, 09:10 AM   #7
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF

Quote:
Originally Posted by SOUL-SKINS View Post
Thanks for bringing up Sproles. I was afraid of getting blasted by everyone on the site. I've wanted Darren for a couple of years now. He's the best screen pass runner in the NFL. Which is perfect for the west coast offense.
Don't ever worry about that. If you feel like you have a legitimate idea that you can convey intelligently (especially about addressing a need with a legit player in this case), don't be a afraid. This site wouldn't exist without opinions and speculation. Someone is always going to disagree. If they didn't this place would be pretty boring.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2008, 09:56 AM   #8
theJBexperience
Impact Rookie
 
theJBexperience's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boone, NC
Posts: 579
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren85Ellard View Post
Agreed. We need a lightning quick guy like Sproles or Norwood to contrast Portis. Someone like Joe Washington! Betts needs 20 carries a game to be effective.
I think you mean the Jets' Leon Washington. And you're right. He is an explosive back. We've got 3 backs with prett similar running styles. Portis USED to be the explosive back who could break one at any time.

I really wanted to replace Betts last year with Steve Slaton or any of the many talented RBs in last year's draft. There were lots of good backs available in the middle rounds. This year's draft, not so much. Several of you have brought it up, but Portis isn't getting any younger, and he's got a lot of mileage, not to mention he normally misses some games due to injury. He needs an heir apparent.

I think Darren Sproles would be the ideal guy for the Skins, but I don't think the Chargers will let him get away. They've already lost one great back to free agency, and they have a smart front office who understands LT can't shoulder the load himself and won't always be carrying the rock for them as effectively as he has.

Steven Jackson, Brandon Jacobs, and Marion Barber are going to be garnering all the attention and high dollar contracts. Maybe, the Skins can pry away Sproles. If not, I wonder if the Giants' Derrick Ward would fit in nicely. He's the speedy alternative to BJ in NY. And he's been very productive at times.

The Skins do definitely need to bolster the RB corp somehow though.
theJBexperience is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2008, 08:29 PM   #9
SeasonTicketHolder
Impact Rookie
 
SeasonTicketHolder's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 549
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF

You guys can yell at me all you want, but I'd love to have a Darren Sproles in the backfield to compliment Portis. Guy is fast as hell and would be a nice change of pace from Portis, who has a more bruising style.
__________________
Gonzaga College High School '04
Loyola College '08
SeasonTicketHolder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2008, 08:43 PM   #10
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 56
Posts: 5,006
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeasonTicketHolder View Post
You guys can yell at me all you want, but I'd love to have a Darren Sproles in the backfield to compliment Portis. Guy is fast as hell and would be a nice change of pace from Portis, who has a more bruising style.
I'm right there with you. I personally have never been a Betts fan and don't really care that he didn't get more touches. He had one decent season, in a contract year, when he was the guy. Other than that, he's failed to impress me since he's been a Redskin.

I would love Sproles as a complimentary/3rd down back and KR/PR. We also should draft a hybrid back like Brian Leonard a few years back from Rutgers who can play some HB and also have the power to be a short yardage threat.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2008, 10:41 PM   #11
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 12,514
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF

extremely basic schemes offense and defense

we're not enough of a powerhouse that you can do what you want, no matter what

it hasn't been that type of NFL in years
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2009, 10:44 PM   #12
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF

Thanks for covering while I was away SGG
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 12:28 AM   #13
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF

I don't think any Skins' fan should get too hyped about Sproles. First, no way does SD let him go. LT seems to be breaking down and SD probably should have traded him and kept Turner: they won't make a similar mistake w/ another dynamite backfield threat.

Secondly, I'd venture to say Sproles wouldn't have much success here. I say that because our run-blocking, even at it's best, is nothing compared to SD. Our old fogies can push off the line a few yards when they're very fresh but rarely make blocks down field, which is why CP doesn't break the big ones anymore. Sure he can grit 7 or 8 yards w/ defenders battering him but there is a certain number of yards from the LOS where it's just CP facing several defenders and our lineman are nowhere in sight. At no time was this more evident than in SF, when I repeatedly saw the o-line give up on blocks/plays while CP was still on his feet. Heyer especially has a knack for giving up on plays, while Rabach/Thomas just don't seem to have what it takes to block DTs or really aggressive LBs. Not to get completely off subject but our line regressed so much this season to the point of looking lazy, slow and very incompetent IMHO. This is a very sad group at this point. Anyway, the whole point is Sproles would struggle mightily to break anything big w/ our line.

To the bigger debate of how to get more dynamic in our backfield, i just see that another/different RB is the answer. Again, speedsters and scat-backs just won't have success until we almost completely gut the line. Have we forgotten that CP was the premier scat-back when we traded for him? To his extreme credit he's become a GD bruiser, but really it's what he had to do (to have success as a Skin). If anything, we should go the opposite direction of Sproles (until the line is completely recycled) and grab a great big bruiser. Honestly I'd hoped Betts would become this guy more each year, adding more bulk and strength to pound defenses whenever CP is out of the game. Betts is not that player. He's a Portis lite as someone said.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 12:35 AM   #14
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF

RB may be something we draft this year, especially if we can trade Betts somehow and grab another draft pick. Anyway, if the FO is smart it will look for a Brandon Jacobs type, not a Sproles type... unless of course we make massive changes to the o-line (like replace Kendell, Rabach and obviously Jansen/Heyer at RT). As i said in another thread i just don't see o-line getting the focus it needs this year so... i'm hoping for a new bruiser in the backfield that "replaces" Ladell.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 02:37 AM   #15
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
RB may be something we draft this year, especially if we can trade Betts somehow and grab another draft pick. Anyway, if the FO is smart it will look for a Brandon Jacobs type, not a Sproles type... unless of course we make massive changes to the o-line (like replace Kendell, Rabach and obviously Jansen/Heyer at RT). As i said in another thread i just don't see o-line getting the focus it needs this year so... i'm hoping for a new bruiser in the backfield that "replaces" Ladell.
One of my biggest gripes with the Skins is that we don't use the players
we have on our roster.

Betts, Cartwright and Sellars have all proved that they can run and catch.
Instead of drafting another RB why don't we use the backs we have more?

We should give them enough opportunities to show their skills and help the team win.

Meanwhile it seems like every other team in the league is spreading the carries to more then one back.

Cowboys-Barber,Jones, Choice
Giants-Jacobs, Ward, Bradshaw
Eagles- a team that runs the ball as an afterthought gave their #2 runningback more work then ours- Westbrook, Buckhalter
Vikings- Peterson, Taylor
Falcons- Turner, Norwood
Seahawks- Jones, Morris
Panthers- Williams, Stewart
etc...etc...etc...

i don't think we need to draft running back
unless we somehow trade back from the 13th pick and still manage to get Knowshon Moreno
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.20134 seconds with 10 queries