Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


How about those Dirtbags??

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-14-2004, 10:04 PM   #1
monk81
The Starter
 
monk81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 2,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big C
on aroudnt he horn, everyone but reali and the chicago guy said that we arent for real, and that theres no way we can win 9 games. they sed that our offense sucks besides portis, and the o line is a question mark...im just like wtf??? did they even watch the game? for real we get no love ffrom a lot of ppl
I HATE that show they are all a bunch of idiots anyway not an intelligent voice in the bunch.............
monk81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2004, 07:44 PM   #2
Big C
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 4,453
why dont they just rasta from creation, man
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
Big C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2004, 07:51 PM   #3
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
I was extremely pleased with the pass protection and the lack of penalties. The run-blocking needs to improve, but I am sure Bugel will take care of that. He's turned this o-line around.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2004, 08:06 PM   #4
GoSkins!
The Starter
 
GoSkins!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 57
Posts: 1,587
It isn't that this years defense is a fluke. It's that last years defense was a fluke. People that don't believe the skins have something special did not watch the game. What I saw was a dominant defense, dominant pass protection, smart coaching, few penalties, and a solid running attack. I'm pretty sure the Ravens used these same things to win the Superbowl a few years back... and by the way, the skins offense will be leaps and bounds better by the end of this year. We just need to win enough to get to the playoffs and then we should be hitting on all cylinders again!

Let the critics talk. The play on the field will tell the real story.
GoSkins! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2004, 01:30 AM   #5
bedlamVR
Special Teams
 
bedlamVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 389
The O line is a question mark? They stood toe to toe with Kiffins line with a healthy Rice and McFarland and ok no Sapp but was he a factor last year? It is also not like they just held on either so many times did the comentators mention the protection and time Brunell was getting was outstanding. The holding penalty on Jones was a sacrifice it was either that or have Brunell taken down for a saftey and that would have been a huge momentum change.

I can still see the D line being a question mark as the Bucs had three new starters on the O and the rest of the offence still needs to start clicking but the lack of an explosive O against the Bucs was partly first day gitters and part game plan. You start chucking it around against the Bucs and forcing things to happen then thier line backers and backfield are going to eventually get that game changing pick.
bedlamVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2004, 05:26 AM   #6
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
PTI is much more informed.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.30646 seconds with 10 queries