|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-03-2010, 10:31 PM | #16 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,341
|
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins at Eagles)
I must admit that I was being super negative in the game thread. It was just so upsetting seeing a team so dominant in the first half fall flat on its face offensively in the second half. Just for once I'd like to see a steady flow of good offensive drives and being able to put games away (esp on the road).
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
Advertisements |
10-03-2010, 10:50 PM | #17 |
Quietly Dominating the East
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
|
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins at Eagles)
Dboyz is more of a Skins fan than some that frequent the game day thread.....rough.
Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water.............
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... “God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs |
10-03-2010, 11:06 PM | #18 |
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins at Eagles)
Stupidity: Some Skins "fans" are really out there with their expectations and criticisms. While some may have valid points I think we are overlooking the fact that this team is in rebuilding mode from a decade of crap. That takes a while. We should be absolutely thrilled our team is .500 and 2-0 in the East. Well done Skins.
__________________
Vacancy |
10-03-2010, 11:08 PM | #19 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 60
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins at Eagles)
I almost threw something at the TV when our boy wonder OC started calling plays for Banks on 1st and goal from the 3, after Portis and Torrain had been gashing the Eagles D for about 6 yards per carry to that point. Young Shanny still leaves a lot to desire on Red Zone play calls. Here's a hint - if the opposing D has shown no ability to slow the running attack, GO SMASHMOUTH when it's 1st and goal inside the 5!!!
|
10-03-2010, 11:13 PM | #20 | |
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins at Eagles)
Quote:
Overall, however, I am very pleased with how we played.
__________________
Vacancy |
|
10-03-2010, 11:14 PM | #21 |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,468
|
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins at Eagles)
Well today the way I look at it we had some positives and some negatives. The positives are why we won the game but the negatives could just have easily been the reason we lost the game. And I'm honestly still getting adjusted to how different this team looks from what we've been accustomed to seeing these last few years. I'm enjoying this win until midnight and then it's on to next week, and if we expect to beat the Packers we have a lot of work to do.
Stephon Heyer is getting a weekly spot in this thread, and it's mainly because he's such a 50/50 guy. He has his bright spots, like blocking good on some plays, and then he has his negatives, like holding guys who he just isn't talented enough to block, and his false starts, which always come at bad times. And the offense needs work too. The running game was working today, but McNabb didn't capitalize in the second half. 3 points over the last 3 quarters usually means a losing effort, but we had a huge first quarter which gave us the cushion we needed. Consistency on offense is what we need. We aren't going to win like this every week. We got lucky when Kolb had to come in for Vick. Defense did good today but I would've not liked to see Kolb waltz down the field at the end there to score a touchdown to bring it closer and make that final drive actually worth something. Carlos Rogers, well what else is there to say? You catch that ball and game is over. I don't know why he has such horrible hands. I don't know who he needs to take lessons from, but something needs to be done. Time to bring back Stickum? It's not even worth mentioning Mike Sellers anymore. If Mike Sellers and Stephon Heyer are gone in the offseason I won't be complaining. They are almost permanent presences on this list. Stephon isn't for lack of effort, he's just not that good, and I feel his negatives outweigh his positives. And Mike Sellers is in the same boat. Everything that used to be a positive about him is now such a negative. |
10-03-2010, 11:15 PM | #22 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins at Eagles)
If only Los could catch
|
10-03-2010, 11:16 PM | #23 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins at Eagles)
Quote:
|
|
10-03-2010, 11:21 PM | #24 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins at Eagles)
Quote:
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. |
|
10-03-2010, 11:22 PM | #25 |
Propane and propane accessories
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 55
Posts: 4,717
|
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins at Eagles)
Huge win.
But as far as smack goes, the failure of the Redskins for the last 5 years at least to EVER ice a game on offense. It kills me. DMac going out of bounds. A false start. Missed WIDE OPEN short passes. A long bomb when we just need 7 yards. And then the shanked punt everyone KNEW was coming. Come on! A few more yards and we take a knee on Philly's home turf. Instead, we're plagued with negativity and doubt. We get that first down and everyone feels better, even with all the same stats.
__________________
Hail from Houston! |
10-03-2010, 11:25 PM | #26 |
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins at Eagles)
Good call JW. What the heck was up with Bidwell's shanks? Was he hurt? I thought this guy was suppose to be the consistent punter to solve our woes.
__________________
Vacancy |
10-03-2010, 11:30 PM | #27 |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins at Eagles)
That was Hunter Smith. I don't know if Bidwell has scandalous pictures of Bruce Allen hidden away or what, but clearly he has a choke hold on this job.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
10-03-2010, 11:32 PM | #28 | |
Fire Bruce NOW
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins at Eagles)
Quote:
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
10-03-2010, 11:33 PM | #29 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins at Eagles)
Quote:
Thanks KS & DMac
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
10-03-2010, 11:34 PM | #30 | |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,468
|
Re: Smoot Lays The Smack Down (Redskins at Eagles)
Quote:
This league today has seen a lot of teams make quick turnarounds in their first year of coaching and part of it is the reason why expectations run so high in the first year of new coaching. I would love to see a playoff run this season but at the same time I have to know that we were so bad last year that I can't just demand it to happen. And this 3-4 looks more and more like it's going to take time. One of the reasons I was so optimistic about the 3-4 this season is seeing the transition the Packers made. I believe they switched to the 3-4 before last season began and they made a huge leap and were one of the statistically better defenses last season despite it being the first year of their transition. So I felt like if they could it why not us? Seeing our defense get shredded the last two weeks before today has definitely reigned in my expectations but I don't want to believe it's going to take 2-3 seasons before we can be a great 3-4 defense. We definitely don't have all the personnel we need for it right now but we have improved from last week to this week. In the end it doesn't matter, we have been inconsistent from week to week, but in the end winning games hides inconsistency and bad play. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|