![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 447
|
Re: Pats should start Flutie
Quote:
I think what will be apparent by game 4 of the regular season is how much better we are as a team, across the board. Most important thing about PR is the team believs in him. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
|
Re: Pats should start Flutie
Quote:
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Pats should start Flutie
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,163
|
Re: Pats should start Flutie
well if the team believes in him i do I will be the first one to jump on his wagon. I was so happy when he took over for brunnell last year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,163
|
Re: Pats should start Flutie
Well it's not like I am a Norman Einstein or something
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Pats should start Flutie
Obviously, I like Ramsey. He's a character guy with a solid work ethic. Moreover, he's got all the "tangibles" to make it in this league. What he needs to work on are the "intangibles."
The "intangibles" are developed through experience - something he hasn't been given yet. Ramsey has started 23 games. The other two first round QBs from 2002 have more experience (Harrington and Carr have both started over 43 games) and have worse stats than Ramsey. I would just like to see the Redskins front office and fans give Ramsey the same shot those other QBs have gotten. Do I think he'll be a Hall of Famer? No, I highly doubt it. But I think he's got what it takes to be a very successful QB. Troy Aikman talked about Ramsey last night during the Patriots-Saints game. Troy said he thinks Ramsey has what it takes to be a very good quarterback, but the constant turnover in D.C. has inhibited his growth. I agree. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Pats should start Flutie
it really chaps my arse that a cowroid QB is a better broadcaster than a redskins QB
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
|
Re: Pats should start Flutie
I'm tired of defending Ramsey, but I'm more tired of people thinking that playing musical chairs at QB is a good thing.
We booed Brunell to the bench last year, and now we're doing the same thing to Ramsey in the preseason. I mean c'mon, it's really ridiculous. What happens if Brunell starts and has a bad game, hell just a bad series... do the boos cascade down from the stands and then Campbell gets a shot? Then what when the rookie inevitably struggles, back to Ramsey? I'm going to defer to this article all week, I think it really puts things in perspective. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 7,506
|
Re: Pats should start Flutie
I loved that article, Matty. If you havent read it yet, read it now.
__________________
#21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 447
|
Re: Pats should start Flutie
Quote:
Brunell graduated to the pre-season and threw for less than 100 yards in 5 of 9 starts. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 36
|
Re: Pats should start Flutie
alright!..
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|