Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Taylor Jacobs

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-11-2005, 02:55 PM   #16
Big C
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 4,453
Re: Taylor Jacobs

gotta get on the field in order to make plays, and taylor jacobs hasnt done that. even patten and thrash havent seen the ball lately. its not like jacobs is out there dropping balls or something in the games, hes not got the game time yet. if he sucks when hes actually playing, then u have a case
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
Big C is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 11-11-2005, 02:58 PM   #17
heybigstar
Special Teams
 
heybigstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 375
Re: Taylor Jacobs

Quote:
Originally Posted by diehardskin2982
I am satisfied with our recievers for right now. Next year I would love for us to make a serious run for Brandon Lloyd of the 49ers, he'll be a free agent.Release Jacobs and draft Santana's bro.

If that rumor of Ramsey to the Jets is true, that would be awesome for our defense and would plug some holes in our front four. then I'd spend the rest of the draft on depth at key positions. I'd also cut walt Harris ~ he sucks!

Jacobs doesn't get the playing time to develop into something of value
Your saying Harris sucks based on one game, Eagles. possibly the Giants too, but everyone sucked then. Harris had been very good up until those games, making big tackles. Give him a few more games before you officially declare he sucks.
__________________
Hail to the Redskins.
heybigstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2005, 03:02 PM   #18
funandgunner
Registered User
 
funandgunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 45
Re: Taylor Jacobs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
Thing is we never had an h-back like Cooley back then.

He's proving to be a very valuable weapon. As Tony McGee said, you're #2 threat doesn't always have to be the #2 WR. In our system right now it's Cooley.
I agree. Cooley really plays like our possession receiver and Sellers is our 2nd h-back/tight end. Difference between Cooley and most possession receivers is Cooley is big and can block. Both of them have great versatility. Having Cooley and Sellers out there has really helped the o-line with their inconsistent performances. It would be nice though to have a consistent "speed" receiver have some production to stretch both sides of the field, instead of the deep coverage being able to focus in only on Moss. We would be able to take more chances deep down the field with some passes (for td's).
funandgunner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2005, 03:11 PM   #19
scowan
The Starter
 
scowan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: KY
Age: 55
Posts: 1,559
Re: Taylor Jacobs

This is probably not for this thread, but I think we are going to need some guys down the streach to step up besides Moss and Cooley. However, it was nice to see the deep ball go to Patten in the Eagles game. He got interfered with, which lead to Seller's TD, but he was in good position to make that catch. At least he went deep and not Moss all the time. Is it me or does it seem like Cooley catches all of his ball on crossing routes or in the Flat? Moss catches the Slants and the once infamous, NOW famous WR screens. I think the Skins could exploit Moss's success by pump-faking to him and then throwing to Patten more.
scowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2005, 03:23 PM   #20
SUNRA
The Starter
 
SUNRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
Re: Taylor Jacobs

[QUOTE=scowan]Daseal, you have said it all right here. After Brunell looks at Moss and then Cooley, Patten's route is over and he dumps to Portis or Sellers. It is a little strange, because during the last and most sucessful Gibbs team (year 1991) Monk, Clark, and Sanders all had big years. The TE or H-B did not do much back then.[/QUOTE

That's not true. Don Warren, Rick Walker and Clint Didier were very instrumental in Gibb's offense and they certainly will be remembered by some of us old timers who cheered them on.
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970
SUNRA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2005, 03:29 PM   #21
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,608
Re: Taylor Jacobs

[QUOTE=SUNRA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by scowan
Daseal, you have said it all right here. After Brunell looks at Moss and then Cooley, Patten's route is over and he dumps to Portis or Sellers. It is a little strange, because during the last and most sucessful Gibbs team (year 1991) Monk, Clark, and Sanders all had big years. The TE or H-B did not do much back then.[/QUOTE

That's not true. Don Warren, Rick Walker and Clint Didier were very instrumental in Gibb's offense and they certainly will be remembered by some of us old timers who cheered them on.
True, but they never had the kind of season that Cooley is having.

Cooley is on pace for 70 catches.
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2005, 03:30 PM   #22
Daseal
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
Re: Taylor Jacobs

Quote:
Your saying Harris sucks based on one game, Eagles. possibly the Giants too, but everyone sucked then. Harris had been very good up until those games, making big tackles. Give him a few more games before you officially declare he sucks.
Maybe it's me but Harris has been worked more than a few times this year. Notice how every time they break a big run it's to his side? I don't think that's a coincidence.
__________________
Best. Player. Available.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2005, 03:31 PM   #23
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,608
Re: Taylor Jacobs

Quote:
Originally Posted by scowan
This is probably not for this thread, but I think we are going to need some guys down the streach to step up besides Moss and Cooley. However, it was nice to see the deep ball go to Patten in the Eagles game. He got interfered with, which lead to Seller's TD, but he was in good position to make that catch. At least he went deep and not Moss all the time. Is it me or does it seem like Cooley catches all of his ball on crossing routes or in the Flat? Moss catches the Slants and the once infamous, NOW famous WR screens. I think the Skins could exploit Moss's success by pump-faking to him and then throwing to Patten more.
Last week against the Eagles we may have seen the beginning of more involvement from Sellers.

The guy is a load in the open field.

Plus let's not forget about Portis who has become more involved in the passing game, and Betts had a nice catch last week too.
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2005, 03:32 PM   #24
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,233
Re: Taylor Jacobs

I'm loving these 5 WR sets. It's like Spurrier, but waaaaaaaay better.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2005, 03:33 PM   #25
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,233
Re: Taylor Jacobs

The problem with Spurrier is that he would do a 5 WR set but have LOOONG developing patterns, getting Ramsey sacked.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2005, 03:35 PM   #26
scowan
The Starter
 
scowan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: KY
Age: 55
Posts: 1,559
Re: Taylor Jacobs

[QUOTE=SUNRA]
Quote:
Originally Posted by scowan
Daseal, you have said it all right here. After Brunell looks at Moss and then Cooley, Patten's route is over and he dumps to Portis or Sellers. It is a little strange, because during the last and most sucessful Gibbs team (year 1991) Monk, Clark, and Sanders all had big years. The TE or H-B did not do much back then.[/QUOTE

That's not true. Don Warren, Rick Walker and Clint Didier were very instrumental in Gibb's offense and they certainly will be remembered by some of us old timers who cheered them on.
Sunra, you are right about Warren, Walker and Didier to some degree, but it may be that there is a new trend at least this year in TE/HBs or whatever you want to call them. I mean if you look around the league at some teams who have winning records you find teams with one "go to" WR and one "go to" TE/HB. Examples: Skins, Chargers, Giants, Falcons, Chiefs (Gonzales is coming around). It seems like many teams like having a big brusier out there who has hands and can run you over instead of outrunning you.
scowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2005, 03:38 PM   #27
Redskins_P
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
Re: Taylor Jacobs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daseal
Maybe it's me but Harris has been worked more than a few times this year. Notice how every time they break a big run it's to his side? I don't think that's a coincidence.

I agree. Harris has been getting worked on his side. He constantly whiffs tackles, and I've noticed also that lately he's been playing really soft coverage giving the WR's all types of cushion. Personally, I think we're better off with Carlos Rogers starting opposite of Springs. He's a much, much better tackler than Harris. And seems to be tougher against the run.

Hasn't anyone noticed that Rogers has had some forced fumbles, but we've never recovered them.
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2005, 03:40 PM   #28
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,233
Re: Taylor Jacobs

Seems like Harris has lost some confidence.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2005, 03:45 PM   #29
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
Re: Taylor Jacobs

Right now Brunell is really locked on to Moss, and Cooley, and yes Cooley is a much bigger part of the game plan than other TE's, and H-backs in the past, I don't know if it's so much Jacobs fault right now, rather more so the productivity of Moss, and Cooley, and to a lesser degree Sellers, Patton see's very little as well and he's a proven game breaker, I just think Brunell is locked in right now on those 3, but he should look to spred it around and get comfortable with the other guy's, because it's front page news at this point if you want to beat us, take Moss, and Cooley out of the game, and it's only a matter of time before we see a heavy dose of that by defenses, ala the Giant game.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2005, 04:05 PM   #30
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: Taylor Jacobs

i would be really surpised if taylor jacobs made the team next year.hurt way too often
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.32179 seconds with 10 queries