|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: Do you approve of the trade for Jason Taylor? | |||
Yes | 195 | 91.98% | |
No | 17 | 8.02% | |
Voters: 212. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-22-2008, 08:30 PM | #286 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
Also, upper body strength is not as critical at RDE or OLB (Suggs positions) as it is for LDE.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. Last edited by Slingin Sammy 33; 07-22-2008 at 08:55 PM. |
|
Advertisements |
07-22-2008, 08:32 PM | #287 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Gabe Watson also dropped to the fourth round because of poor/questionable workouts in 2006, and he's become the first round type of talent people thought he would be.
Of course, one year later, fellow Wolverine Alan Branch did the same thing, fell to the 2nd round, and his rookie year was less than promising.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
07-23-2008, 03:21 PM | #288 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
I found a video about Taylor talking about his new number. There's also a pretty entertaining one of the fans reacting to Taylor being a Redskin. Check them out on comcastsportsnet.com. Go skins!
|
07-23-2008, 03:41 PM | #289 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 506
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
My main point is that people shouldn't get so caught up with metrics like bench reps. and clocked 40 times in my opinion. I'm not saying that good players don't work out or are not strong. That would be a ridiculous statement. Anyway, let's just drop it and we'll see what happens when they strap 'em on. Last edited by Drift Reality; 07-23-2008 at 03:55 PM. |
|
07-23-2008, 05:45 PM | #290 |
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 256
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Drift Reality - I was just joking with you. I totally understood where you were going with your statement.
|
01-28-2009, 11:55 PM | #291 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
Clayton said we could get 50 sacks. We got 25 sacks. Hey, he was half-right! We got 8 fewer sacks than last year. I believe a schematic change is primarily responsible. But reading through this thread, it seems somewhat insincere that people would bitch about not having a 2nd rounder this year. We got a pro-bowler didn't you hear?
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
01-29-2009, 12:17 AM | #292 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
01-29-2009, 12:38 AM | #293 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
So long JT...
That 8.5 mil could be better spent in soooo many ways.
__________________
24-34 |
01-29-2009, 01:18 AM | #294 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Goats right 8.5 does nice things. But so does a healthy JT
Last edited by 44ever; 01-29-2009 at 01:06 PM. |
01-29-2009, 10:28 AM | #295 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
|
|
01-29-2009, 12:24 PM | #296 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Queensbury, NY
Posts: 273
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
__________________
"Baseball is what we were, football is what we have become" |
|
01-29-2009, 01:59 PM | #297 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do. |
|
01-29-2009, 02:06 PM | #298 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
Going forward I just don't see him fitting well now that we aren't facing a last minute decision. Taylor isn't real effective @ left end but probably not a huge upgrade over AC on the other side (in our 4-3 system). Like i said elsewhere as much as i respect Daniels i mean c'mon, 36 yrs of age and it's not like he was always healthy prior to '08. If cutting JT clean allows us to grab a value left end, someone who can stop the run and get a little more pressure than Evans, i'm ok w/ that. ... heard it suggested Taylor would play OLB (replacing Marcus btw things sound). F'ing no ok. Just f'ing no. Tackling, run-stopping is not his strong suit.
__________________
24-34 Last edited by The Goat; 01-29-2009 at 02:11 PM. |
|
01-29-2009, 02:33 PM | #299 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,749
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
|
|
01-29-2009, 03:36 PM | #300 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: White Plains, Maryland
Age: 69
Posts: 56
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
What's even more sickening is that on top of giving away a 2nd round draft pick, Vinny only signs him to a 1 year contract. Vinny does this with every big name FA. He pays them big bucks, gives away future draft picks and only signs them to 1 year contracts.
In the case of Taylor, he gets a freak injury and we don't get the expected production out of him. At the end of the season Blache lets him play his natural position, he starts to make an impact and the season's over. Now that his contract is null and void, if we want to keep him it'll cost another 8.5 million. Shouldn't this have been negotiated in the first place? Maybe sign him to a 2 year contract where he could make his 8.5 million in incentives in the second year of his contract? At least we would have had the opportunity to see if he could add any value to our defense in, at the least, a limited role as an outside linebacker in passing situations. At least get some kind of value from giving away our 2nd round pick.
__________________
Bring the Redskins back to Washington! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|