With the 5th pick in the draft the Washington Redskins select...

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan

Dianna also said that if Fowler isn't there at #5, then the Skins would prefer to trade down and take an offensive lineman.

BTW, you can be sure that Scot M. is pissed off that somebody leaked that information to the press. Who is the big mouth at Redskins Park?

Dianna has Chris Cooley's back. I'm just sayin'

Sent from my S6 Edge

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Dianna has Chris Cooley's back. I'm just sayin'

Sent from my S6 Edge

So is that who she's sleeping with now?...lol The rumor last year was with a coach/ some players.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan

Dianna also said that if Fowler isn't there at #5, then the Skins would prefer to trade down and take an offensive lineman.

BTW, you can be sure that Scot M. is pissed off that somebody leaked that information to the press. Who is the big mouth at Redskins Park?

I dont think she is right, think this is smoke. Keim has stated multiple times that most leaks have stopped and information was extremely tough to get. That this was a priority in the offseason.

[Defensewins]

Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan

Dianna also said that if Fowler isn't there at #5, then the Skins would prefer to trade down and take an offensive lineman.

BTW, you can be sure that Scot M. is pissed off that somebody leaked that information to the press. Who is the big mouth at Redskins Park?

This is a deliberate leak in order to advertise to the other teams we are open to trades. This is similar to posting a for sale sign in the front yard. The more offers the better. It does not mean we will do anything (up or down). Trying to get a bidding war started is smart.
I still think Williams, Fowler or Beasley will be there and you take one. Trading down dilutes the talent pool too much. As has been widely reported there are only 6 to 8 blue chip prospects. Trading down from 5 has to be a big offer.

[KI Skins Fan]

Originally Posted by Defensewins

This is a deliberate leak in order to advertise to the other teams we are open to trades.

H-m-m-m-m. Very sneaky. I like it.

[Chico23231]

Leonard Williams told Mayock that the Skins told him at his visit that "they didnt think he would be there, but if he falls he was their guy"

[Ruhskins]

Given the rumored price that the Titans have for their #2 overall pick (they want Cleveland's two first rounders and their second round pick), I'm hoping that this results in them letting Mariotta pass and he falls to us.

I imagine Washington's price for their #5 would be less than what the Titans are asking. Also, I think teams wouldn't want Mariotta to fall to the Jets, who would definitely take him.

I'd have a harder time passing on Leonard Williams than Mariotta in a trade down scenario.

A think a great scenario for the Skins would be to get P. Rivers, the #17 pick, and a 3rd rounder (maybe a 2nd rounder) for our #5 overall.

[Chico23231]

Todd McShay's final mock draft

Like Mel Kiper, McShay has Winston and Mariota going 1-2. Dante Fowler goes to the Redskins at No. 5, but: “if the Redskins are presented with a good trade offer to move back, that’s what they’ll do."

per McShay

[Irrefutable]

if Fowler is the pick what happens to Trent Murphy ?

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by Irrefutable

if Fowler is the pick what happens to Trent Murphy ?

Nothing. He stays with the team as a backup OLB.

[Defensewins]

Originally Posted by Irrefutable

if Fowler is the pick what happens to Trent Murphy ?

We need him. Depth is so important, having a rotation and keeping pass rushers fresh is important and injures are a reality in the NFL. We need three great OLB's, that is why getting Fowler or Beasley (if Williams is gone) is huge.

[53Fan]

I want Dante Fowler. If he's gone and we get Beasley I'll be happy too, but Fowler would pump me up sky high. One of those two and a good O-Lineman in the second, maybe another in the 3rd or beyond, and a FS in the 3rd or 4th. Pick up a third down back, WR, or TE that can catch and block...I'm good to go baby! Staying along the lines of BPA of course. But I certainly think it's possible. At least in my head.

[SFREDSKIN]

I wouldn't be surprised if we trade the pick (granted someone is willing) I think giving RGIII the 5th year option raises the cap next year and picking someone in the teens is cheaper than #5.

[Defensewins]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

I wouldn't be surprised if we trade the pick (granted someone is willing) I think giving RGIII the 5th year option raises the cap next year and picking someone in the teens is cheaper than #5.

RGIII getting $16M is NOT done deal. He has to earn it. Not based on potential.

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by Defensewins

RGIII getting $16M is NOT done deal. He has to earn it. Not based on potential.

I know that, what happens if he reverts to 2012? No one knows, just have to plan ahead. You also have Williams and Kerrigan's contract coming up.