Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


JC is not what I thought.

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-21-2008, 10:29 PM   #1
jsarno
Franchise Player
 
jsarno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 51
Posts: 9,534
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
I thought it was BS at first but on the replay it looked like he might have gotten the buy from behind.

Touchy call I agree, but I thought the PI on Rogers was even more ticky-tacky.
I agree on the Rogers call...but Heyer hit the man in the front of his pads, it wasn't Heyer's fault his head was turned and he appeared to quit on the play. There is no doubt that was a blown call. Yet Hochuli is getting crucified? There is nothing in the books about not hitting a guy that decided to mentally quit. Besides, the call was "hands to the face", and there was no hands to face at all.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin
jsarno is offline  
Old 09-21-2008, 08:49 PM   #2
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
If Heyer doesn't commit that dumb penalty it could have been 31-17. I honestly was never that concerned about the Skins losing this game at any point.
Yeah, although we got 2 huge gifts from the officials as well, so it's hard to complain. The two TDs called back (1 for each time) even out I guess, but the no-call on Rogers INT was pass interference on Torrence.

That said I REALLY wanted Devin Thomas to catch his first TD as a Redskin today. Oh well.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline  
Old 09-21-2008, 08:50 PM   #3
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
Yeah, although we got 2 huge gifts from the officials as well, so it's hard to complain. The two TDs called back (1 for each time) even out I guess, but the no-call on Rogers INT was pass interference on Torrence.

That said I REALLY wanted Devin Thomas to catch his first TD as a Redskin today. Oh well.
I know, I was so excited on that play. It feels like he just needs a play like that to get some confidence going.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Old 09-21-2008, 08:52 PM   #4
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
I know, I was so excited on that play. It feels like he just needs a play like that to get some confidence going.
I agree. You can see why we drafted him as far as skills are concerned. He just needs to settle in and get a few big confidence type plays (and be a little more subtle with his push-offs).
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 12:00 AM   #5
dmvskinzfan08
Impact Rookie
 
dmvskinzfan08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
If Heyer doesn't commit that dumb penalty it could have been 31-17. I honestly was never that concerned about the Skins losing this game at any point.
and to add to that the sketchy officiating..including the two offensive pass interferences and the one def pass interference. the officials were horrible. On that same play there was a late hit on Campbell. So if they had called both fouls then it would have been offset.
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21
HATERS << Misery Loves Company
dmvskinzfan08 is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 02:55 AM   #6
4thGenRedskin21
Registered User
 
4thGenRedskin21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 164
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmvskinzfan08 View Post
and to add to that the sketchy officiating..including the two offensive pass interferences and the one def pass interference. the officials were horrible. On that same play there was a late hit on Campbell. So if they had called both fouls then it would have been offset.
Very, VERY Sketchy officiating. There was multiple bad calls against us in that game, and I dont understand, can't we get better refs for our own home games? I mean shit, im not asking them to give us anything, but you woulda thought we were playing in AZ the way the officials were making them bogus calls. I sure hope we dont have that same crew the next time we go home
4thGenRedskin21 is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 01:43 PM   #7
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4thGenRedskin21 View Post
Very, VERY Sketchy officiating. There was multiple bad calls against us in that game, and I dont understand, can't we get better refs for our own home games? I mean shit, im not asking them to give us anything, but you woulda thought we were playing in AZ the way the officials were making them bogus calls. I sure hope we dont have that same crew the next time we go home
You keep insulting posters about dumb post and then you post this. What, you think because we have home field advantage that we get to pick the ref's for the game and shoould get a break from the rules every now and then?
firstdown is offline  
Old 09-21-2008, 09:11 PM   #8
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
Re: JC is not what I thought.

On the season now JC's QB rating is 100.1

Jason Campbell
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Old 09-21-2008, 09:40 PM   #9
53Fan
Franchise Player
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Can you imagine JC 2-3 years in this system? Is'nt it funny how the haters who were saying he was stupid and would never make it as an NFL quarterback have mysteriously gone silent. So quick to judge, then so quick to hide. Maybe they can progress in their thinking as Jason has in this offense. Maybe now when he makes mistakes, which he will at times, seeing how he has only played 3 games in this offense, and after all, he is only human. Maybe they will understand more about patience and understand " It is better to be silent and thought of a fool, then to open ones mouth and remove all doubt" These same people who are ready to call someone out, need to take accountability for their own remarks. See Jason can't hide, he doe'st have that luxury. Man up haters.
53Fan is offline  
Old 09-21-2008, 10:30 PM   #10
Rajmahal33
Special Teams
 
Rajmahal33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 478
Re: JC is not what I thought.

I am a strong believer in the fact that things are never as good or as bad as they seem (esp. not right after a game). So in that spirit, one area i thought JC needs to improve upon big time is his consistency throughout ENTIRE game. There are going to be games when our defense is going to need a breather, and consecutive 3 & outs aren't going to be acceptable if we want to win. He needs to work on taking what he can and audibling when we need to keep drives alive. Along with that we have been leaving a lotta points out on the field and settling for FG's (esp after a turnover).

Overall he played excellently against a challenging defense and kept pace with a high powered offense. Hope we don't see the Dr. Jekyll side of Campbell on the road the next few weeks.
__________________
McNasty FTW!
Rajmahal33 is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 01:08 AM   #11
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
Re: JC is not what I thought.

JC's turning out to be what i thought...
That Guy is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 03:50 AM   #12
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,595
Re: JC is not what I thought.

With each passing week this thread gets more and more hilarious.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 11:02 AM   #13
skinsnut
Playmaker
 
skinsnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,030
Re: JC is not what I thought.

As good as Campbell has been the last 2 weeks...the Oline's performance has been equally as good.
How about some props to the olines improvement since the crap sandwich they fed us week one?

Great job oline!
__________________
I hate Dallas...Period
skinsnut is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 11:06 AM   #14
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Some props definitely needs to go to the OL for the pass pro, but the running game is still not firing on all cylinders.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 12:11 PM   #15
dislandman
Camp Scrub
 
dislandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hilton Head Island, SC
Posts: 4
Re: JC is not what I thought.

I agree with Mooby, with each passing week this thread does get more and more hilarious.
I am just thankful that those who would jump on our players, aren't responsible for the management of our team!
Yes, unfortunately, big time players do have off games and do make mistakes. The true great ones, put their mistakes behind them, learn from their mistakes and grow, as is Campbell. Time will tell whether he will develop into a "great one", but so far, I like what I see, especially considering he is learning ANOTHER new offensive system for the 3rd year running now in the NFL.
dislandman is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.65578 seconds with 10 queries