![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Do you approve of the Redskins' trade up to #2? | |||
| Yes |
|
193 | 91.47% |
| No |
|
18 | 8.53% |
| Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,412
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
BFD. If we should happen to go 5-11 next season when RGIII is a rookie, then we'll still probably go 11-5 in 2013 with a more experienced RGIII at QB. You just don't get it, do you?
Last edited by KI Skins Fan; 03-10-2012 at 10:46 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: staten island
Age: 50
Posts: 477
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
The year after the Eli trade, the Chargers went 12-4, Giants went 6-10. SD had the Giants 12th overall pick. What made it worse at the time was the Giants could have not done a trade and still had Rivers (or Roethlisberger). I am not going to argue Eli vs Rivers vs Big Ben, but the Giants and Steelers have 2 Super Bowls since and the Chargers have a few division titles. Not as if the Skins can stay at 6 and still get one of the stud QBs.
__________________
"Everyone is talking about their dynasty. Well, OUR DYNASTY STARTS TONIGHT."--Michael Strahan, pre-game huddle Pep talk, February 3rd, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
reading the negativity in this thread is amazing. Lets just move on at this point. Was it alot, yes, but the return is huge. Lets see how this plays out first.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Schertz, Tx
Age: 46
Posts: 3,224
|
Quote:
Who did we get that was any good when we got all those picks from new Orleans in the Ricky Williams trade
__________________
Spider 2 Y Banana Jr. is the new Head Coach. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
I dont see any desperation in this at all.
This is how it works in the NFL today. If you want to win, this is what you do. This really isnt that much different than the Jay Cutler trade.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,584
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,584
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 3,543
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Basic economics. Supply was low (there's only 1 RG3). Demand was high (multiple teams wanting to trade up to #2, the Browns specifically). That tells you the price is going to be high. People can compare the Chargers/Giants trade but in reality they do not compare because the Giants were in a one team competition. It's comparing apples to oranges.
__________________
Sean Taylor #21 a Redskin forever... Team Heinicke Fan Club punch it in - CEO SkinzWin - President FrenchSkin - VP of Global Operations ODUsmitty - Director of Cheerleader Fulfillment Meks - Director of Marketing |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 7,506
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
I slightly say yes, but man it's close. Really allot to give up, but this franchise is in such dire need of a franchise QB, that I feel like we had to do it. There is a significant drop off between Luck/RGIII and everyone else... while it sounds great on paper to draft a guy in the second and have him learn for a year or two, how often does that really work out? Not saying guys never bust, but everything you see from RGIII has been gold. Not saying I'm happy about the 2 first rounders and second rounder just to move up four slots...but given way the organization has built itself the past few years, I think we're finally in a position to make this type of a deal.
We NEED to get a bigtime WR. I dont want to go nuts in free agency, except for that. Thats a must, we need a bigtime guy to come in, let Hank continue to develop and hopefully be a solid #2 who could develop into a #2 and then Moss to the slot. I think once we get a legit WR threat, we'll be so much more competitive.
__________________
#21 |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,767
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Having a young top caliber prospect at Qb in Washington has been a LONG time coming.
Luck and RGIII are special. Time will only tell if this trade has been worth it. The chance of the Redskins having the #1 or #2 pick in an upcoming draft is unlikely. We are a rebuilding team, but the days of having a Colt-like one or two win season are way behind us. This reason alone make this risk/trade slightly more palatable. Even if we did not do this trade and kept all of our picks, the chances of us being in position to draft an RGIII/Luck type Qb in the 2013 and 2014 draft is extremely unlikely. We payed a high price to get our guy. I am starting to be ok with it. FA and the draft picks we have left are critical. OL, CB, WR and developing quality depth are critical. If we fail to get quality at Cb, OL and to a smaller extent WR, we will be a .500 or less team again next year. We showed early last season that when healthy this core group is pretty good. We were devastated with injury last year. That won't happen every year. HTTR! Last edited by Defensewins; 03-10-2012 at 11:09 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
I'm incredibly stoked that we went all-in for a QB and soon will have Griffin.
But the sticker shock is just killing me.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 3,543
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
Quote:
__________________
Sean Taylor #21 a Redskin forever... Team Heinicke Fan Club punch it in - CEO SkinzWin - President FrenchSkin - VP of Global Operations ODUsmitty - Director of Cheerleader Fulfillment Meks - Director of Marketing |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Bliss, TX
Posts: 2,277
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
“This is the best throwing athlete I’ve seen come out in a while,” said former Baltimore Ravens coach Brian Billick, who now works for the NFL Network. “Far better than [Philadelphia Eagles quarterback] Michael Vick, in my opinion. Far better than [Carolina Panthers quarterback] Cam Newton.”
This is Brian Billicks take on RG3. Boy do I hope he is right! Not better, FAR BETTER. I think as time passes by, we will look back and be very satisfied with the trade. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
I sure would like the Orakpo trading talk to die off.
Part of why I'm ok with the RG3 trade is that our defense is good and young and wont need that many bodies in the near future. Losing Rak would put a noticeable hole there.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|