Redskins Free Agent Signings

[ethat001]

Analysis of Quick, from Eagles fanpage in Feb with film analysis: http://phillysportsnetwork.com/2017/02/07/wrquick/

[Chico23231]

With Terrelle Pryor and Brian Quick, Washington Redskins add size - Washington Redskins Blog- ESPN

Not a terrible group, but really hinges on the development of Doctson. If he can get on and stay on the field then I don't think we lose a lot from the Garcon/Jackson.

[metalskins]

Remember, Quick played with some terrible quarterbacks with the Rams, so having Cousins throwing the ball to him should really make Quick look a lot better. I think the Redskins signed him to push Josh Doctson. Love that the Redskins have size at wide receiver. Who knows? They may wind up drafting another receiver as well.

[btfoom]

Originally Posted by metalskins

Remember, Quick played with some terrible quarterbacks with the Rams, so having Cousins throwing the ball to him should really make Quick look a lot better. I think the Redskins signed him to push Josh Doctson. Love that the Redskins have size at wide receiver. Who knows? They may wind up drafting another receiver as well.

Agree with all of this.

Quick is a big guy with good speed. Yes, he hasn't lived up to 'potential' yet, but he's played with some of the WORST QBs in the league. He's a bit of a gamble, but his up-side is way higher than the amount the Skins paid for him. If he can catch well thrown balls, I believe he can be a big part of the offense for very little down side.

[calia]

Originally Posted by btfoom

Agree with all of this.

Quick is a big guy with good speed. Yes, he hasn't lived up to 'potential' yet, but he's played with some of the WORST QBs in the league. He's a bit of a gamble, but his up-side is way higher than the amount the Skins paid for him. If he can catch well thrown balls, I believe he can be a big part of the offense for very little down side.

Between Pryor and Quick, anyone else think we're going to see a lot of that fade route we all loved so much last season? I guess they're focused on curing our red zone problems, which is a good thing. Doctson, Pryor, Quick and Reed all at once -- hard to cover that kind of elevation potential.

[MTK]

Doctson will be a stud

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by MTK

Doctson will be a stud

I agree. And Crowder is going to go over 1000.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

I agree. And Crowder is going to go over 1000.

Absolutely.

Doctson is going to be Green/Hopkins 2.0

[skinsfaninok]

Man we are loaded on off. Quick is a very good 3 or 4

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Man we are loaded on off. Quick is a very good 3 or 4

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

We need a rb.

[FrenchSkin]

Originally Posted by mredskins

We need a rb.

I wouldn't say we NEED a rb. Sure it would be nice to have a legit work horse.

But run blocking wasn't great last year.

I'd be fine with improving that and letting Kelley, CT, Brown and Jones (if he fixed his fumbling issue) compete and share the work load.

Envoyé de mon TOMMY en utilisant Tapatalk

[DYoungJelly]

Originally Posted by FrenchSkin

I wouldn't say we NEED a rb. Sure it would be nice to have a legit work horse.

But run blocking wasn't great last year.

I'd be fine with improving that and letting Kelley, CT, Brown and Jones (if he fixed his fumbling issue) compete and share the work load.

Envoyé de mon TOMMY en utilisant Tapatalk

Listening to 980 (Cooley and others), we NEED a RB badly based on Kelly's performance last year. Kelly missed cuts and while getting positive yards, always left blocked yards on the field.

[calia]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Man we are loaded on off. Quick is a very good 3 or 4

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

I wonder what this means for Grant.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by calia

I wonder what this means for Grant.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dream scenario is move him to the Rams for a late round draft pick.

[Defensewins]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Man we are loaded on off. Quick is a very good 3 or 4

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

We have so many WR's, like we did last season..
So many holes to fill on defense, and the DT's that we signed are not great. Swearinger played on a top defense with a top defensive coach. I am not convinced they will make much of a difference.
If we use our top two picks on a RB or O Lineman we will have to suffer through another season of watching our defense not be able to get off the field. We will be home in January.....again.