Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-09-2006, 10:07 PM   #31
PWNED
The Starter
 
PWNED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ZOMGZZZ!!111
Age: 32
Posts: 1,160
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?

i give him credit and i like rock a lot on special teams, but we also must not lose sight that the rams run defense sucks balls.

i know it seems like im diminishing his accomplishment, but i just want to keep us grounded

glad we resigned him though1
__________________
143 lbs of twisted steel and sex appeal.
PWNED is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-09-2006, 10:20 PM   #32
SanFranSkinsFan
Special Teams
 
SanFranSkinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 102
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PWNED
i give him credit and i like rock a lot on special teams, but we also must not lose sight that the rams run defense sucks balls.

i know it seems like im diminishing his accomplishment, but i just want to keep us grounded

glad we resigned him though1
I too am glad we re-signed Rock. I remember when he was a 7th round pick from Kansas State years ago and he has worked his butt off every year to make the roster. There is no good reason why he and Nemo should not BOTH be on the roster. Rock for Teams and hopefully Nemo can morph into a solid short-yardage back. At least Nemo needs to step up on teams but we know Rock is awesome there. Rock won't have a lot of 100 yard games, but he's a real Redskin and that's why he was still here. Love the Rock, pound the rock.
Anyone notice that LaVar was not on Lennie's list of top 50 UFAs? He may not get any good offers....
SanFranSkinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2006, 10:54 PM   #33
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SanFranSkinsFan
I too am glad we re-signed Rock. I remember when he was a 7th round pick from Kansas State years ago and he has worked his butt off every year to make the roster. There is no good reason why he and Nemo should not BOTH be on the roster. Rock for Teams and hopefully Nemo can morph into a solid short-yardage back. At least Nemo needs to step up on teams but we know Rock is awesome there. Rock won't have a lot of 100 yard games, but he's a real Redskin and that's why he was still here. Love the Rock, pound the rock.
Anyone notice that LaVar was not on Lennie's list of top 50 UFAs? He may not get any good offers....
I think it has something to do with his release status. Lavar has to be top 10 if not top 5.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2006, 10:55 PM   #34
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PWNED
just to not read too much into that stat, rocks huge YPC average came on a couple HUGE gains.
More importantly he cost them the K.C. game.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2006, 11:07 PM   #35
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim21Reaper
I think it has something to do with his release status. Lavar has to be top 10 if not top 5.
unless someone thinks lavar's knee is blown for good...
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2006, 12:28 AM   #36
diehardskin2982
Another Year, another mess.
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
Re: Does ?Rock's new deal mean no Nemo?

Rock was originally a fullback and al saunders uses that position in his schemes so maybe they had a place for him
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.99668 seconds with 10 queries