Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Bigger disappointment?

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Vikings loss: bigger disappointment?
Offense 23 15.54%
Defense 125 84.46%
Voters: 148. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-11-2006, 11:55 PM   #1
Counter-Tre
Special Teams
 
Counter-Tre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Venice Beach, CA
Age: 53
Posts: 347
Re: Bigger disappointment?

Good god, how many 3rd and 9's did the Vikings convert on us!
Counter-Tre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 12:03 AM   #2
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
Re: Bigger disappointment?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Counter-Tre View Post
Good god, how many 3rd and 9's did the Vikings convert on us!
Yep, that number sticks out for me too. On the post game show on the way home, they said the Vikings were 9 for 17 on third down. 7 of the 9 were for 3rd and 7 or longer.

No pass rush and a poor pass defense add up to lots of 3rd down conversions and a loss. Simple as that.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 12:40 AM   #3
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
Re: Bigger disappointment?

Defense easily. I knew I wouldn't be suprised if our offense didn't start flying out of the gate, but the Vikings O handled our defense pretty easily.
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 01:17 AM   #4
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Bigger disappointment?

I thought the offense did quite well for the most part. But you gotta score touchdowns, not field goals. Defense gave up way too many 3rd downs. And so much for Archuleta and Taylor making offenses fear going over the middle. I think overall defense was clearly the bigger let down.

But to me there was no let down bigger than special teams coverage. That was just abysmal.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 01:17 AM   #5
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 50
Posts: 2,631
Re: Bigger disappointment?

our entire D-Line was M.I.A. and our big offseason hope Andre Carter seems to have made everyone worse.

our secondary: * BIG TROUBLE *

Springs won't be the same guy he was last year, even after he heals.

Rogers is a great nickelback, only a decent no.2, and by no means a no.1. he's had enough starting experience to show his potential guys, and his upside is looking less and less.

Archuleta is a wannabe Sean Taylor, with none of his physical qualities. He's not as fast, not as strong, and worse yet, with all his 'experience', he wasnt showing any kind of veteran instinct.

Prioleau was playing good for us last year, better at coverage for those 3rd and longs, and looks like he's out this year.

That leaves us Rumph and Wright. we're in real trouble back there.

Williams' blitzes only work when you can have some confidence in one of those two units (ideally both). our linebackers can't be a defense unto themselves.

our offense is new, it's obvious its just a matter of time (what happened to passing to SELLERS on the goaline, Cooley is the decoy!). but the defense isn't new, it's in the worst shape it's been in years. i'd be making some serious phone calls this week.
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 01:31 AM   #6
diehardskin2982
Another Year, another mess.
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
Re: Bigger disappointment?

I'm starting to miss ryan clark atleast he kept sean in check... the o looked good to me but where was cooley, duckett, lloyd? Too many weapons i guess. It will get better it is only the first game
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 07:21 AM   #7
budw38
Playmaker
 
budw38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern,Va.
Posts: 2,706
Re: Bigger disappointment?

I would say defence . We are in our third year under Willams . I do however feel it is not his fault that they overpaid for Carter < no pass rush > and Adam , who has never been good in coverage . It is only week 1 , but they better spend next off season building the left side of our O Line < i think Samuals and Dockery are too soft > and get a kid like Abraham < Atl > who can hurt the opposing qb . Wish we had drafted Merriman last year , beast ! NOW IT IS TIME TO WAX THE COWGILRS !!!!!!!
budw38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 08:37 AM   #8
jbcjr14
The Starter
 
jbcjr14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Age: 56
Posts: 2,015
Re: Bigger disappointment?

I think the injury to Prileau on the opening kick had alot to do with the defensive calls. He is a vital part to the nickel packages and to have him go down that early may have changed that. I voted Dfense because they just could not get off the field on 3rd downs. It's week one...DO NOT PANIC.
__________________
"Work Harder: millions on welfare are counting on you" - Obama 2009 address to Congress.
jbcjr14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 08:38 AM   #9
onlydarksets
Playmaker
 
onlydarksets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
Re: Bigger disappointment?

No question - defense. They looked lost at times, although, as I've said elsewhere, ST looked good.
__________________
Stop reading my signature.
onlydarksets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 08:43 AM   #10
VTSkins897
Impact Rookie
 
VTSkins897's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 43
Posts: 890
Re: Bigger disappointment?

honestly i'm glad this game is over. the west coast offense, especially run by brad johnson, is a pain in the ass to play, especially with our pressure-style defense.

i look for us to beat the cowboys, who looked just as bad as we did.

brad johnson is a damn good QB in my mind. he's like 8-2 over his last 10 games right? just be glad this game is over.

i may be freaking out but the vikings could be in the running to win the nfc north. none of us should be worried now. i was impressed to see the offense move the ball when it needed to.
VTSkins897 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 08:46 AM   #11
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: Bigger disappointment?

BJ has always been very underrated. The guy just wins.

I came away very impressed by the Vikings. They are very physical at the line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball, and they have a QB that isn't going to make mistakes and lose games for them. They should be right there with the Bears for the division title.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 08:49 AM   #12
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 64
Posts: 10,672
Re: Bigger disappointment?

what is up with our defense? for the past 2+ seasons, has been top 10 quality. the only 2 changes have been ryan clark and lavar. did someone underestimate how much they meant to this team?
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 08:57 AM   #13
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: Bigger disappointment?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25 View Post
what is up with our defense? for the past 2+ seasons, has been top 10 quality. the only 2 changes have been ryan clark and lavar. did someone underestimate how much they meant to this team?
Missing Springs is HUGE.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 12:34 PM   #14
JankySpanky80
Special Teams
 
JankySpanky80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 267
Re: Bigger disappointment?

If we don't have Springs next week we are gonna get killed. GW won't leave Rogers, Rumph, or Wright on an island against TO or Glenn, therefore we won't have any pressure and we all know how Bledsoe does without pressure. I love the skins to death but if they perform like they did last night and all of preseason this game will be over by halftime.
__________________
JANK-e SPANK-e
JankySpanky80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2006, 12:38 PM   #15
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Bigger disappointment?

Neither side of the ball was very effective but I think the defense was the greater disappointment. Inability to cover receivers, penalties, third down conversions, and just overall lack of effort were all contributing factors. Players point to mistakes, but it's not a mistake when you can't cover anybody. If we see that same kind of coverage against Owens, Glenn, and Whitten on Sunday night then a flight to Dallas is useless. You can't go "back to the drawing board" and learn how to cover receivers, and tackle opposing ball carriers. We must do a better job with the basics.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.23112 seconds with 11 queries