![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
|
Re: Brunell Back in 2007?
Collins - non-factor. Totally agree.
I do think MB would be great to have for another year. He knows JC well, the team, the plays... oh, I already said that! haha... |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Brunell Back in 2007?
As always, the salary cap will play the biggest role in deciding what we do with Brunell.
If we cut him from the roster, we'd save $2.3 million in 2007 salary cap space. Or we could renegotiate his contract. He is owed $5.2 million in base salary in 2007. We could still pay him that $5.2 million, just converted to signing bonus. This would free up about $3.5 - $4.0 million in 2007 salary cap space. Knowing Gibbs and how much he loves vets, and specifically MB, I'm betting we keep him as a #2 and renegotiate his contract. No pay cuts, just renegotiation. Two big factors at play: 1) Gibbs loves Brunell (and vet QBs in general). 2) The 'Skins love to renegotiate contracts so they can create tons of cap space. My money says he stays as our #2. Unless he demands out, then Gibbs will accomodate him.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Brunell Back in 2007?
I don't see him going anywhere, he'll either retire or return as a backup here. If I had to bet on it I'd say he retires.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Brunell Back in 2007?
He'd make a solid backup. I hope he stays for that. When he's healthy and fresh, he's great....and he's be both as a backup. Having a veteran as a backup is a big plus, especially one who has played extensively in the system, except for Todd Collins. You need talent along with the knowledge.
We could always get Tim Hasselbeck back if he doesn't take over for Eli.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: Brunell Back in 2007?
I am betting that he stays as a back up. If for no other reason than that Gibbs really likes him. With him as the back- up, Gibbs will feel that he has two starting QB's on the roster. Another QB will be aquired to be next year's number 2 and be given a year to acclimate.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Brunell Back in 2007?
I do agree he would be a valuable backup, but a part of me would be nervous that Gibbs would go back to him.
It's a bit of a relief though that Campbell looks promising, I think as long as he keeps it up he will remain the unquestioned starter next year. Gibbs' comments about JC lately seem to indicate that he's gaining confidence in him and he's impressed with how well he's handling things. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Brunell Back in 2007?
Yeah of course Brunell wants to start and believes he still can. There are plenty of guys that never come to the realization that they can't play anymore.
I don't think Brunell has reached that point where he can't play at all anymore, but his starting days are definitely behind him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Brunell Back in 2007?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Brunell Back in 2007?
I don't believe Mark will retire this year, but I kind of see Gibbs convincing Brunell to stick it out at least one more year with the Redskins.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,427
|
Re: Brunell Back in 2007?
Mark Brunell: 2007 Comeback Player of the year.
He will be in Oakland and help Moss regain his old form. Hey, My guess is as good as your... |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Age: 53
Posts: 114
|
Re: Brunell Back in 2007?
He would be a top shelf backup anywhere at this point. I would like to keep him around. I think he could be very good over a few games for us and I think he can be a positive example on Campbell because he has been a great Pro QB and knows how to act.
He only comes back with a renegotiated contract though, for backup pay. He's due a $6.63 million cap hit in 2007!
__________________
A fool finds no pleasure in understanding but delights in airing his own opinions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Brunell Back in 2007?
At 36 turning 37 early next year, he's probably too old to start over somewhere as the starter. He could be a backup in pretty much any system.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Brunell Back in 2007?
Quote:
I think there are going to be a few teams shaking things up next year. Even if Brunell stays put in D.C., I could still see a starting opportunity coming up somewhere in the league. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 64
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Brunell Back in 2007?
didn't he talk about retiring before this season started?
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
|
Re: Brunell Back in 2007?
Why is it that everyone's dancing around the main issue here?
![]() Mark Brunell has the best head of hair in all of football. Frankly, he should be promoted to the coaching staff to make sure the helmet doesn't ruin his line.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|