Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Clinton Portis

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-24-2007, 11:52 AM   #1
BrunellMVP?
Impact Rookie
 
BrunellMVP?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 726
Re: Clinton Portis

you know that sellers play worked really well in the past (the year he had like 6 TDs for a total of 8 yards), so i don't mind the call...

as for betts- i agree, should have been someone else, but really...i'm not sure it would have made a difference....the calls were bad..too transparent as the giants were in the backfield...
__________________
in writing these daily letters and trying to make them interesting it is always possible that some sentiment may occur which has not received the severe and deliberate scrutiny and reconsideration which should attach to a State Paper.
- Churchill
BrunellMVP? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 12:05 PM   #2
EternalEnigma21
Assistant Regional Mod
 
EternalEnigma21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carbondale CO
Age: 46
Posts: 2,958
Re: Clinton Portis

yeah I wouldve rather had portis searching for paydirt than betts... but in that situation on the one yardline I wouldve handed it to sellers or done a QB sneak...
__________________
I am the brute squad.
EternalEnigma21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 01:23 PM   #3
TrustinGibbs
Special Teams
 
TrustinGibbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wilmington, NC
Age: 61
Posts: 104
Re: Clinton Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by canthetuna View Post
yeah I wouldve rather had portis searching for paydirt than betts... but in that situation on the one yardline I wouldve handed it to sellers or done a QB sneak...
Agree'd...whats wrong with your 280+ pound FB plowing in from a yard out and whatever happened to letting your rather big QB sneak it in? They rushed when they didn't have to(something Campbell will learn to take control of) and didn't have the right back in the game but you still need to score there with three shots even if it is with what is in reality a real good back up running back.

They need to find their offensive identity and Portis needs to play a bigger role in that if they are to contend for the playoffs.
TrustinGibbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 12:45 PM   #4
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,584
Re: Clinton Portis

The bottom line is Portis fumbled and didn't catch a pass that would have helped keep a drive alive. Maybe we need to bring in Rock.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 12:52 PM   #5
Southpaw
The Starter
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
Re: Clinton Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
The bottom line is Portis fumbled and didn't catch a pass that would have helped keep a drive alive. Maybe we need to bring in Rock.
How the hell is that the bottom line, when Betts had the opportunity to tie up the game and failed twice? It sounds like your only defense of Betts lack of ability is that Portis had a bad play too. That's a ridiculous argument.

And as far as the Portis fumble; it was a bad exchange. Portis never even had possession of the ball. And the dropped pass is bad, but those plays happen. What's your defense for Betts' less than two yard rush average?
Southpaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 03:27 PM   #6
jdlea
Playmaker
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
Re: Clinton Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southpaw View Post
How the hell is that the bottom line, when Betts had the opportunity to tie up the game and failed twice? It sounds like your only defense of Betts lack of ability is that Portis had a bad play too. That's a ridiculous argument.

And as far as the Portis fumble; it was a bad exchange. Portis never even had possession of the ball. And the dropped pass is bad, but those plays happen. What's your defense for Betts' less than two yard rush average?
No man, Betts is better because Portis fumbled and dropped a pass. It doesn't matter what Ladell Betts did or didn't do, the argument ends at Clinton fumbled. Betts's continued red zone ineffectiveness has nothing to do with this argument. Or Clinton's averaging 3 yards more per carry yesterday than yesterday. Clinton fumbled a handoff on twice the workload...that means Betts should be in there...even if he can't average 2 yards a carry, break a tackle or score with 2 opportunities from the 2 yard line.
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 03:35 PM   #7
The Zimmermans
Impact Rookie
 
The Zimmermans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 41
Posts: 937
Re: Clinton Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdlea View Post
No man, Betts is better because Portis fumbled and dropped a pass. It doesn't matter what Ladell Betts did or didn't do, the argument ends at Clinton fumbled. Betts's continued red zone ineffectiveness has nothing to do with this argument. Or Clinton's averaging 3 yards more per carry yesterday than yesterday. Clinton fumbled a handoff on twice the workload...that means Betts should be in there...even if he can't average 2 yards a carry, break a tackle or score with 2 opportunities from the 2 yard line.
DID you just argue with yourself? You can't base what portis is gonna do on the next play based on his last play.
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure
The Zimmermans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 02:29 AM   #8
EternalEnigma21
Assistant Regional Mod
 
EternalEnigma21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carbondale CO
Age: 46
Posts: 2,958
Re: Clinton Portis

yeah... if we're talking about fumbling tendancies and we're saying we should play betts over portis due to them... wow. thats all i can think to say...

I re-watched this play and there was a gaping hole outside that he could've hit had he looked at it, but it looked like he was just searching for a quick cut-back lane and I dont know if he would've had the speed to get there anyway. I know CP could've, but we'll never know if he wouldve... however Mike Sellars would've been my call at least one of those times...
__________________
I am the brute squad.
EternalEnigma21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 03:12 AM   #9
jsarno
Franchise Player
 
jsarno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 51
Posts: 9,534
Re: Clinton Portis

Let's make this simple.

Betts, 596 career carries, 9 tds. (avg of a TD every 66.22 carries)
Portis, 1433 career carries, 55 tds. (avg of a TD every 26.05 carries)

Yeah, I have a problem with Betts carrying the ball with the game on the line instead of Portis.

Nuff Said!
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin
jsarno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 04:55 AM   #10
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 61
Posts: 3,097
Re: Clinton Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsarno View Post
Let's make this simple.

Betts, 596 career carries, 9 tds. (avg of a TD every 66.22 carries)
Portis, 1433 career carries, 55 tds. (avg of a TD every 26.05 carries)

Yeah, I have a problem with Betts carrying the ball with the game on the line instead of Portis.

Nuff Said!
It's not fair to site Portis's stats when he was in Denver, if Betts was in denver those stats could easily be reversed, Betts and Portis as Skins comparatively, Betts has averaged more yards per carry than Portis.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 04:03 AM   #11
Luxorreb
^21^
 
Luxorreb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Age: 54
Posts: 1,630
Re: Clinton Portis

I'm pretty sure Portis was hurting the entire 2nd half. He came out on that last drive. We could all say shoulda coulda woulda at this point. Only real thing is none of that matters now. I'll guarantee ya it won't happen again. We also gotta remember that the game was not lost on that pathetic drop in the backfield. It was the 21 unanswered points and ineffective offense the entire 2nd half. You leave a defense out there what do you expect!? Can't wait til after the bye week. Can't believe players don't have to report!? What kinda bullcrap is that?
__________________
^21^
Luxorreb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 06:55 AM   #12
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
Re: Clinton Portis

According to Gibbs, Betts and Portis nare interchangeable. I think Gibbs may be going senile if he thinks those backs are interchangeable.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 07:13 AM   #13
djnemo65
Playmaker
 
djnemo65's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
Re: Clinton Portis

So we are turning on Betts now too? Next how about a thread about how the equipment managers screwed up.

This has got to be the worst week on the warpath I can remember.
djnemo65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 08:24 AM   #14
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
Re: Clinton Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by djnemo65 View Post
So we are turning on Betts now too? Next how about a thread about how the equipment managers screwed up.

This has got to be the worst week on the warpath I can remember.
Definitely the most ridiculous
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 08:29 AM   #15
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
Re: Clinton Portis

Quote:
Originally Posted by djnemo65 View Post
So we are turning on Betts now too? Next how about a thread about how the equipment managers screwed up.

This has got to be the worst week on the warpath I can remember.
Who is turning on Betts?
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.82139 seconds with 10 queries