|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-13-2008, 01:02 AM | #31 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lake Travis, Texas
Age: 43
Posts: 786
|
Re: Redskins #14 in ESPN Offseason Power Rankings
Quote:
Well i guess we will see, Clevelands road is not easy at all. Their first two games are Dallas and Pittsburgh. |
|
Advertisements |
05-13-2008, 01:18 AM | #32 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Redskins #14 in ESPN Offseason Power Rankings
Quote:
I'm not writing off those defensive acquisitions here, but they also traded their best cover corner, maybe the best cover corner in that division (Bodden), to Detroit in the Rogers deal and they will be replacing him with the great...Gary Baxter. They are really going to be asking a lot from that front seven to improve 4 "wins"** worth just to keep them competitive in a tough division. **My argument here is that last year's Browns roster playing this year's Browns' schedule would win 6-7 games. I have numbers to back up this theory, but for simplicity's sake, I'm just posting it as an opinion. I will give you that Pittsburgh and Cincinnati are playing the same difficult schedule that Cleveland is, that much is certain, however I feel that those teams are far more prepared to play those tough opponents than the young Browns are AND they are just probably better teams overall. I don't think Cleveland is going to be relevant come December--unless a bunch of guys have career years.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
05-13-2008, 03:30 AM | #33 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
|
Re: Redskins #14 in ESPN Offseason Power Rankings
I rather be out of the national spotlight anyway. Whenever the media had low expectations for us we rocked and surprised teams we normally wouldn't have. Yet when they expect us to win the division we don't measure up. I like where we sit. i think its not high enough where i would like but respectful enough not to go 20th and down because of our rich history.
__________________
I laugh at you Colt Brennan haters. You're the same guys who didn't wanna bench Brunell for Campbell. The tables will turn. |
05-13-2008, 09:50 AM | #34 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Redskins #14 in ESPN Offseason Power Rankings
The redskins do have tons of questions, generous ranking.
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
05-13-2008, 10:49 AM | #35 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Age: 39
Posts: 545
|
Re: Redskins #14 in ESPN Offseason Power Rankings
We need about five more years to catch up with everyone else.
__________________
We will miss you Sean. RIP 1983-2007 REMEMBER VT Go Hokies |
05-13-2008, 10:58 AM | #36 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,608
|
Re: Redskins #14 in ESPN Offseason Power Rankings
I think guys like Collins, Albright, and Daniels and throwing off the curve.
|
05-14-2008, 10:39 AM | #37 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: Redskins #14 in ESPN Offseason Power Rankings
This is a middle of the pack team so the power ranking fits.
|
05-14-2008, 11:14 AM | #38 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,350
|
Re: Redskins #14 in ESPN Offseason Power Rankings
Quote:
|
|
05-14-2008, 11:47 AM | #39 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Redskins #14 in ESPN Offseason Power Rankings
Quote:
And last year, their defense was actually better than Cleveland's (and was the worst it had been in the Lewis era). I'm not saying that will be the case again, just that the offense will be better. I also dont get why we can't go off teams records from last season, but then I can't put Cinci over Cleveland in part because Cleveland had a better record last year? Cleveland had a poor off-season. It's possible that adding Shaun Rogers and Corey Williams helped them, but Rogers is a chronic underachiever and I don't think it offset the loss of their top CB. I expect their D to improve over last year, but they are going to get blown out (lose by 10+ points) in at least seven games this year. They may do well in close games, and should beat the Ravens twice, but I still don't like them for any more than 6-7 wins.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|