Your next QB for the Skins?

[Trample the Elderly]

Like I said in the other QB thread, you might as well ask, "What punching bag do you put behind the Redskins's Maginot line?" Insert any ole asshole and you'll have guys defending him on this board. "Why he's the best thing since sliced bread. Yes Sire, he going to take us to the Superbowl". It's more like, toilet bowl.

[TheSmurfs22]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Ultimately it's going to come down to what the next HC thinks though. He still has those qualities that coaches drool over, big arm, he's big and mobile... you could almost hear Gruden sizing him up last night. And with the egos that coaches typically have (I can make this kid something) I just wouldn't rule it out.

~~~~~~~
I got that sense from Gruden too. Maybe I am reading into too much but Gruden seemed like a guy who was sizing the Skins up in general.
I also agree with you, Campbell's fate may come down to who the HC is and whether or not the Skins wake up and address the O line.

[Coff]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Ultimately it's going to come down to what the next HC thinks though. He still has those qualities that coaches drool over, big arm, he's big and mobile... you could almost hear Gruden sizing him up last night. And with the egos that coaches typically have (I can make this kid something) I just wouldn't rule it out.

I agree with that. Gruden seemed to focus on very fixable aspects of JCs game, such as planting his feet before a throw and keeping his eyes downfield.

[tryfuhl]

Originally Posted by Coff

I agree with that. Gruden seemed to focus on very fixable aspects of JCs game, such as planting his feet before a throw and keeping his eyes downfield.

every analyst this year has said that

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Depending on who the coach is, there's a chance JC stays. Just saying.

Agreed. He's playing extremely well CONSIDERING he has zero protection and is running for his life. Heck, he doesn't even have a center that can snap the ball properly...no QB could succeed with this line, or lack of one.

I think he has showed a lot of progress and even leadership, but no captain can save a sinking ship...he can only hope to keep it above water as long as possible. Look at the second half drives against Philly, with Campbell obviously hurting (ankle) from taking so many shots. He put together some great drives that would have resulted in 2 TDs and an impressive comeback if Rabach wasn't such a...

I want Campbell back with a built-up line and new coach. I believe he'll do extremely well. Our top pick must be used on the best tackle in the nation.

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by Buster

Agreed. He's playing extremely well CONSIDERING he has zero protection and is running for his life. Heck, he doesn't even have a center that can snap the ball properly...no QB could succeed with this line, or lack of one.

I think he has showed a lot of progress and even leadership, but no captain can save a sinking ship...he can only hope to keep it above water as long as possible. Look at the second half drives against Philly, with Campbell obviously hurting (ankle) from taking so many shots. He put together some great drives that would have resulted in 2 TDs and an impressive comeback if Rabach wasn't such a...

I want Campbell back with a built-up line and new coach. I believe he'll do extremely well. Our top pick must be used on the best tackle in the nation.

This is what I've been saying and makes the most sense. Do people want some inexperience backup to run the team? I don't, I rather take my chances rebuilding the line and see how Campbell performs under it. This would only happens if Campbell wants to return after all the crap he's been thrown at.

[warriorzpath]

You know JC should definitely not stay. Among many mistakes in decision-making, he ran in front of his blocker, Heyer, right into a sack. I don't think I've ever seen a quarterback like Campbell that creates so many mistakes FOR HIMSELF (and as a result for the redskins team). Instead of raising the level of play of his teammates, he lowers them.

[WaldSkins]

I say go sign Garcia to a 2 year deal why we build the olines. Then we go after Matt Barkley in 2012

[skins89moss]

Originally Posted by WaldSkins

I say go sign Garcia to a 2 year deal why we build the olines. Then we go after Matt Barkley in 2012

Thats a gamble to wait and hope to draft Matt Barkley who's just a freshman.

[firstdown]

How about Mark Brunell?

[warriorzpath]

A college quarterback that I heard Gruden likes a lot is Tebow. Tebow is probably the anti-Campbell in his nfl skills and leadership. But Tebow would be a terrible fit for the redskins because he would probably be too reliant on his running ability.

[an23dy]

Originally Posted by warriorzpath

A college quarterback that I heard Gruden likes a lot is Tebow. Tebow is probably the anti-Campbell in his nfl skills and leadership. But Tebow would be a terrible fit for the redskins because he would probably be too reliant on his running ability.

I don't understand why so many people think Tebow won't be able to succeed in the NFL. I think attitude is so much more important than people think. The guy is a winner and he works hard. Maybe I'll end up eating these words, but I don't think he would allow himself to fail in the NFL. Since we don't have an O-line anyways we might as well get a guy that can run and break some tackles.

[Hamoskinz]

Since I want to rebuild the o-line first, I would bring in Jeff Garcia and battle it with CB5 for a starting QB while we use the 2010 draft to rebuild the o-line exclusively.

If we had 2 1st picks then I would consider drafting a QB (possibly Bradford/McCoy) with one of those picks.

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by Hamoskinz

Since I want to rebuild the o-line first, I would bring in Jeff Garcia and battle it with CB5 for a starting QB while we use the 2010 draft to rebuild the o-line exclusively.

If we had 2 1st picks then I would consider drafting a QB (possibly Bradford/McCoy) with one of those picks.

The problem is that we need a QB that develops with the line. If we just address the line then your talking two years or so then we find a QB and talking another 2 to 3 years and by that time some of those OL contracts will be running out.

[tootergray34]

whoever said sign garcia to a 2 year deal and go after barkley in two years has the best Idea...good QB's are going to be coming out every year like it or not...you can't fall in love with any ONE but we desperately need O LINE help. We need to be spending our first rounder on a stud left tackle...then another CENTER that knows how to snap...and we need a right tackle and a right guard...so basically our next two years we have our first 2 rounds slated for OLINE! Then we can think about a QB...maybe try a project in round 4 of this years draft...you know...sense we gave up our 3rd rounder for a guy who plays about 5 snaps a game in Jeremy Jarmon...who has "tons of upside". I'm tired of drafting guys with upside...why can't we get playmakers at day one.

Look at the Ravens...they have drafted OLINE heavily in the first rounds for what...the past five years...and look at how productive they are know. You have to deal with a few years with a shitty QB to build up an oline that's going to dominate...then any QB can succeed...even jason campbell. Although I don't feel JC is the answer...at least in this offensive scheme. and neither is CB for that matter...but man Barkley is looking like the next brady and manning to me.