![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Team with big expectations most likely to implode in '10?
Once they get John Skelton into their starting lineup, Cards will be just fine
![]() I thought the Cards would be good enough with Leinart being a game manager, and Beanie Wells' career taking off to compete for the division title. After seeing Leinart (and Anderson) on Monday night I'm less confident
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Team with big expectations most likely to implode in '10?
Quote:
And if they struggle early and are 2-6 or so at mid-season I'd put Skelton in.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
|
Re: Team with big expectations most likely to implode in '10?
Yeah Leinart looked shakey and DA looked like, well DA. But it's still early. Leinart seems like he just needs to get some confidence going.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Team with big expectations most likely to implode in '10?
I wonder just how much confidence the Cardinals organization have ever really had in Leinart. I thought when Bulger became expendable they would have made a play for him. In the event Leinart falters completely, I thought Bulger would have been a good fit there. They need a qb that can consistently get the ball to their playmakers.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Team with big expectations most likely to implode in '10?
They might as well play Skelton. Leinart has proven over and over he's not a starter...Derek Anderson is better than him, only slightly...but he's a Cleveland Browns reject.
If things start to fall apart, which they probably will...throw Skelton into the mix.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Team with big expectations most likely to implode in '10?
I'm going with the Vikes.
A hobbled Brett Favre, no Sidney Rice for half the season, and who knows if Percy Harvin can endure those migrains for an entire season. They lost Chester Taylor during the offseason. Sure they drafted Toby Gerhart, but will he compliment Peterson running and receiving the way Chester Taylor did? I'm very interested to see what AP does this year. I think he's still a 1500 yd back, but more in the style of Clinton Portis and less break away TDs. Peterson experienced a drop off in YPC for the last 6 or 7 games last year. I wonder if all the pounding is starting to catch up to him. I think they are a 9-7 team this year. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 60
|
Re: Team with big expectations most likely to implode in '10?
Vikings and Dallas, the Jets defense will keep them in every game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Team with big expectations most likely to implode in '10?
The Cowboys aren't really deserving of the hype, but what else is new? I do think they are going to beat a lot of pessimistic projections for their battered OL, winning some close games against weaker teams to reach 9 or 10 wins, but that doesn't sound like a team ticketed for the super bowl.
As bright as I think the future is for McCarthy's Packers, people are WAY overboard on the Aaron Rodgers love these days. Not only is he being mentioned as one of the top five QBs in the game today (a bit premature, but not that outlandish), but some are talking about him as an all time great. A mediocre record for the Packers and another season w/o a playoff victory will help keep his rise in context. The Texans and 49ers are getting a lot of love for teams that haven't been good in the last seven years. If you're looking to bet against hype, gambling against teams that don't ever win is a good place to start. The Raiders also fall into this category, but there's more substance there than in either Houston or San Francisco. They just don't know how to use it. I don't think they will, but if they ever figure it out...they could actually be a force in the AFC playoffs. Until that day, it's probably the status quo for them. I'm not sure what T.O. did to make everyone forget how unlikely the Bengals were to return to the playoffs in THAT division, but it was quite the slight of hand. And finally, I agree with everyone on the Jets. This year's team is a lot like last year's team, which means 7-9 wins. This year's AFC is not like last years, where that many wins somehow resulted in a playoff berth (well, at least for non-AFC West teams).
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 37
Posts: 14,189
|
Re: Team with big expectations most likely to implode in '10?
Minnesota Minnesota and Minnesota with Dallas not too far behind.
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Team with big expectations most likely to implode in '10?
Yeah Cards are going to be average this season atbest. Biggest disappointment is going to be the Vikings. Favre won't last a month I bet, plus look at the WR corp now. AP had a nice year last season, but not like his hot rookie year. If Favre has nobody to throw to the defenses can just load up in the box for the run. Dallas seems to lose a lineman a week so far in the preseason. I think Romo is going down also.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Staunton, VA
Posts: 1,261
|
Re: Team with big expectations most likely to implode in '10?
I would love nothing more than to watch the Cowpukes go up like Atlanta in Sherman's March to the Sea.
I also think the Vikes are vulnerable.
__________________
F#$% the Cowpukes! |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 47
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: Team with big expectations most likely to implode in '10?
I'm going with Cowboys...way-way-way hyped up and overrated. I will not be shocked if they finish 8-8. Teams like the Cowboys have no business talking Super Bowl...no business.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 7,506
|
Re: Team with big expectations most likely to implode in '10?
I don't get the hype around Dallas to be all world, but I think they'll make the playoffs, so I dont know if that means they "implode"...
I'd go with the Vikings though.
__________________
#21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Team with big expectations most likely to implode in '10?
Not sure Dallas will make the playoffs. Thing is their line is now totally suspect, which might affect Romo significantly. Without his line in top condition Romo is average.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Team with big expectations most likely to implode in '10?
Dallas
Jets Vikes
__________________
http://www.twitter.com/RedskinsRT |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|