![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Age: 37
Posts: 1,092
|
Re: Armstrong bad choice?
Quote:
To me AA is a good story, and a guy that by all accounts worked his butt off to make this team. If he can give us something on offense (which our coaches must think he can) than we got something. I dont think it's going to change the fact that we need WR help because even if he pans out we're getting up there in age at the position. It's just a bit silly to be talking about a "bad choice" already, imo. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Armstrong bad choice?
I am sure I have heard a saying...
Patience is a bird in the bush....no Patience is overrated...no Oh a "virtue"...Patience is a virtue. Seems to apply. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Age: 45
Posts: 623
|
Re: Armstrong bad choice?
Week 1 ... We Won the game 13-7 and are 1-0
However Armstrong is a cool choice to have around but how about as a 4th WR .. DT #11 should get his way into the lineup at somepoint, think of how last season he finished strong.. that reverse against NY comes to mind along with the Saints game ... It has to be Moss,Thomas,then Galloway or Armstrong .. who are we kidding here ?? All that being said ... If we can somehow get Vincent Jackson we have to make that move ... this team has to much MoJo and hype to go all year with the hopes of Moss making every play .. I agree Davis needs to get more involved which I think will happen as well ... sorry for the rambling but i'm just not comfortable with Armstrong but i'm not giving up on the guy either .... Maybe we should put D.Hall as the IronMan
__________________
"F*CK THE DALLAS JUMBOTRON" NFC EAST CHAMPS RG3 will be back & #12 can run the show until hes ready.We are young w depth. 23,59,89 will all be back.Alfred Morris aka Diesel Hybrid ! @DCtoAZ81 ...2013 NFC CHAMPS |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
No new threads for you
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,959
|
Re: Armstrong bad choice?
I am with you he needed to catch that but first off Mike Knows that he should of called a better route than that on the second try second He's a rookie, third that corner was hanging all over him its only uncatchable when their hanging on your neck like a drunk girl at a bar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 51
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: Armstrong bad choice?
Quote:
I do agree the second ball was not catchable, but his route running was suspect as well. I just don't see why people are impressed with this kid. I don't see the potential apparently. Keep in mind, it's not like he didn't play football professionally, he played for Odessa and Dallas (desperados).
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Armstrong bad choice?
I watched parts of the game again.
And Ruhskins is right Cooley was open. Armstrong might have been the WR for that particular play at that particular time. But, not for the reason everyone thinks but because he was coming into the game cold. 1) He had barely been on the field and wasn't targeted on any pass plays until then. How's this for pressure his very 1st NFL pass target was a stutter fade in the RZ against a top NFL CB/bitter division rival. 2) Armstrong was the wrong choice on that particular play was as Ruhskins pointed out: Cooley was more open for a much easier throw and catch if McNabb had waiting a nose hair longer. The worst part is that Cooley was open again on the second play too. I'm sure this is one of the plays McNabb regrets from the game that he mentioned in his press conference and on his radio show. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Armstrong bad choice?
Quote:
On the more general topic, I expect that Thomas will be the #2 WR by season's end. He's put together some good games last season and once he earns Kyle's trust/respect I think he will earn a role in the offense.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||||
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Armstrong bad choice?
Quote:
I would be interested to see that b/c if you listened to the presser or the interview he seems to spefically refering to this play (at least the second time) as a mistake/throw he would like to have back. ESPN 980 Audio Vault - Play Now Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But, either way wether its by committee or someone steps up i have full confidence that our passing game will be fine. There were WRs open yesterday and there were plays that were missed and mistakes that were made that will be minimized as the season progresses. The passing game will improve as McNabb and Kyle gets more comfortable with each other and with the receivers. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
|
Re: Armstrong bad choice?
In terms of the 2nd pass. I remember in the off-season MS saying something to the effect that he will do that sometimes, especially if the player knows he ought to have caught it, as kind of a way to redeem himself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Armstrong bad choice?
Height wasn't a factor on those passes to him anyway. He flat out dropped the first and the 2nd was well defended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,412
|
Re: Armstrong bad choice?
On point comments:
1. Armstrong should have caught the first fade pass. If he wants to play in the NFL, he'd better start making the plays he needs to make. I'm not throwing him under the bus. He just needs to make the tough catches to stick. 2. I think that using Devin Thomas, who has a longer reach and good hands, might have been a good choice for that play. Nevertheless, I admit that I don't know how well (or poorly) Devin runs that play. Fred Davis could have been used there, as well. Related comments: 1. Our WR corps is weak. Very weak. We need to stop kidding ourselves about that. 2. If Vincent Jackson's suspension is reduced to three games on Thursday, then Shanahan should offer SD his left nut in trade for Vincent. He would solve part of our WR problems. 3. If the Skins don't trust Brandon Banks enough to use him as a KR or WR, they might as well put him on the taxi squad and bring up Terrence Austin who I think can play WR in this league. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 51
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: Armstrong bad choice?
Quote:
What is going on with Banks anyway...I liked that kid in the preseason. He has major speed and he can make our return game explosive. Then again, who knows really.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Armstrong bad choice?
Quote:
DT was great. By the time he works his way into the starting lineup, Banks will probably get onto return duties. I'm guessing Roydell will be the odd man out when these two get promoted.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,634
|
Re: Armstrong bad choice?
The difference between KC and the Redskins is the Cheifs have to let their young rookies play. Dexter McCluster and Javier Arrenas are rookies but they made a huge impact in the win over San Diego. The Redskins think they have a chance to win this season so they rather play it safe by playing Galloway,instead of Thomas at WR. Also not letting Brandon Banks return KR or PR. Rookies will make mistakes at times but sometimes when you have speed and young legs you will get the big plays.
__________________
www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam Flowers and Kukui Nut Leis. Great selections and best prices. Redskins Fan Since 1972 |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: KY
Age: 57
Posts: 1,559
|
Re: Armstrong bad choice?
Guys I think all of this will normalize this week against Houston. Armstrong will have more catches and Arian Foster will have fewer runs. I don't see Foster going for 230 yards against us and I also don't see us only scoring 13 points either. Will we win? I don't know, but every week is different and I think Houston realized they could run on the Colts and keep Manning off the field and they did so successfully, which was good game planning. I think McNabb will be more successful every week and get more players involved. I also predict a 100 yard week out of Portis. I don't know who has the advantage on Game Planning this week, with Houston knowing what we will do and Kyle Shannahan knowing what they will do. Either way, Houston doesn't know what Hasslet is going to do that's for sure!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|