![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Lenny P reporting Moss signed.
Not a bad deal IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Lenny P reporting Moss signed.
I think $5 million per season for a WR isn't as much as it used to be. WRs are expensive, that's just a fact of life. I don't think Moss is a bargain at this price, but I don't think we overpaid. Sounds right on the money to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Lenny P reporting Moss signed.
Yeah, as soon as I got on here this morning, I was like, "I can deal with that."
Not TOO shabby.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Lenny P reporting Moss signed.
After thinking about it, it's probably a pretty decent deal for the Redskins. At least we have Moss in our camp now - a much needed receiver working out with the team!
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 506
|
Re: Lenny P reporting Moss signed.
Yeah, except we overpayed for his ass.
Oh well, we can't be wrong on all of our decisions. Can we???? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Lenny P reporting Moss signed.
Only time will tell if this was a good deal. He does seem to have a nack for getting into the endzone and if I'm correct Coles only score one TD last Year. With all of his receptions you would have thought he could have scored a few more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Lenny P reporting Moss signed.
Quote:
I really don't think this is a bad deal at all, in fact I was expecting much worse. It's basically a 5-year, $25M deal. Could have been much worse. If we took a WR at #9 in the draft it probably would have cost just as much if not more, at least we're getting a proven guy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Lenny P reporting Moss signed.
Yeah, and we know he DOES have the potential to be a strong #1 as well. In his best season, he put up TO-like numbers. If he can replicate that kind of production, I'll be more than happy with the contract.
I'll think it was a bargain.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 506
|
Re: Lenny P reporting Moss signed.
Quote:
Receiver #1: Career totals over four years: 151 receptions 2416 yards 19 TDs Receiver #2: Career totals over four years: 227 receptions 2997 yards 22 TDs Hmm....guess who is who? Receiver #1 is Santana Moss, who just signed a huge contract; and Receiver #2 is Rod Gardner, who is being run out of town. Now, I'm not saying I'm a Gardner fan, but I'm not a fan of overpaying players who haven't proved anything either. This is another stupid move, in a litany of stupid moves, from the worst personnel department in the NFL - not the cheapest, but the most incompetent when it comes to handing out contracts and making trades. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Lenny P reporting Moss signed.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 506
|
Re: Lenny P reporting Moss signed.
Quote:
I mean, come on!!! 5 mill/year???? That's more than Smoot got. Are you telling me you'd rather have Moss signed than Smoot? Look at it this way - if we had signed Smoot for that contract WE COULD HAVE DRAFTED MIKE WILLIAMS. Who would you rather have? Fred Smoot and Mike Williams; or Santana Moss and Carlos Rogers????? Jiyan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Lenny P reporting Moss signed.
What you and wolfeskins say are both very true... It can go either way. It's the same to say that Pierce SHOULD have stayed for just a little less money than he was offered just as the Redskins should have paid a little more.
Typically, I like to side with the organizations because we get into the age-old argument that pro athletes are paid too much.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arlington
Posts: 35
|
Re: Lenny P reporting Moss signed.
That's a fair position ... it's definitely an issue that can quickly lead to a circular discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
|
Re: Lenny P reporting Moss signed.
not to mention moss is a great punt returner. and what has gardner done to help out special teams?
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Lenny P reporting Moss signed.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|