Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-22-2005, 10:43 AM   #1
Southpaw
The Starter
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
Bledsoe and Brunell both have 8 wins this year just like Vick.

Vick = overrated name.
If Vick had Bledsoe's receivers or Washington's defense, he'd have more than eight wins.


Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMalcomConnection
Yes, his presence in the game DOES make his teammates better, but what is up with everyone defending him for the Pro Bowl this year?
I'm not actually defending him for the Pro Bowl, I'm just giving reasons why I can understand he was picked. You guys seem to forget that it's not just fans that pick the Pro Bowl, which is very apparent from the fact that Cooley didn't make it, in spite of being far and away the fan favorite. So obviously his peers and the coaches think he's worthy too.

Coaches gameplan for Vick and are always attempting to keep him contained. I highly doubt any coach in the league is saying to himself before a Dallas game, "How are we going to stop Bledsoe?".
Southpaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 03:34 PM   #2
ST21
Impact Rookie
 
ST21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 519
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southpaw
If Vick had Bledsoe's receivers or Washington's defense, he'd have more than eight wins.




I'm not actually defending him for the Pro Bowl, I'm just giving reasons why I can understand he was picked. You guys seem to forget that it's not just fans that pick the Pro Bowl, which is very apparent from the fact that Cooley didn't make it, in spite of being far and away the fan favorite. So obviously his peers and the coaches think he's worthy too.

Coaches gameplan for Vick and are always attempting to keep him contained. I highly doubt any coach in the league is saying to himself before a Dallas game, "How are we going to stop Bledsoe?".
Finally, Reason and Logic, Listen Ladies dont get it twisted (black terminology) I'm a Redskin fan...first, but this Idea that every QB has to stand in the pocket to be consider a regular QB is crazy, black or white, good is good and bad is bad, and Vick # don't state he should be there, but he does as much for his team as Peyton Manning..... Now everyone says I use race, and sometimes I do, because I can feel the hate for this one paticular QB, all you critics do are critize him,..... Respect what he can do, and give him time to grow, as far as I'm concerned....not just fans voted him in, and I didn't either...I voted for Brunell, Bled-hoe and Hasslebeck.....but this weekend I watch Peyton, look dazed and confused, and when he couldn't throw the ball those athletic abilitys didn't workout for him...........
__________________
SAY HELLO TO THE BAD GUY........
ST21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 09:54 AM   #3
hail_2_da_skins
Impact Rookie
 
hail_2_da_skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 70
Posts: 868
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

F@#% the Pro Bowl. No one watches it anyway. The Skins get no respect. They will just have to earn it by going to the playoffs and winning playoff games. The Pro Bowl selections will follow next year.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS"
hail_2_da_skins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 12:13 PM   #4
JWsleep
Propane and propane accessories
 
JWsleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 57
Posts: 4,719
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

Quote:
Originally Posted by hail_2_da_skins
F@#% the Pro Bowl. No one watches it anyway. The Skins get no respect. They will just have to earn it by going to the playoffs and winning playoff games. The Pro Bowl selections will follow next year.
I'm with you, hail. And I'd rather be overlooked at this point--it puts yet another chip on the shoulder of our team.
__________________
Hail from Houston!
JWsleep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 01:29 PM   #5
skins052bgr8
Special Teams
 
skins052bgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Richmond, Va.
Age: 50
Posts: 288
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

Dan Patrick gives Brunell some love and says he should have been the # 2 QB behind Hasslebeck and the third QB slot is a toss up between Delhomme, Vick, and Eli, but Brunell should have definitely been voted in because of his play. Could not agree more.
skins052bgr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 10:37 AM   #6
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 64
Posts: 10,672
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

matty your right on.vick might be the most over rated name in sports,not just football
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 10:41 AM   #7
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

Ugh. Why are people so willing to slurp Vick and no other worthy names? Like I've never seen people who loyal to one player. Again, I won't deny that he's exciting to watch but that's about it. Yes, his presence in the game DOES make his teammates better, but what is up with everyone defending him for the Pro Bowl this year? People SERIOUSLY have man crushes on Ramsey and some are STILL calling for him to play, but I've never seen loyalty the likes of people with Vick.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 10:56 AM   #8
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

Vick is in on name alone. Let's not kid ourselves and try to sugar coat it by pointing to wins or his lack of WRs. It's not like he throws to his WRs anyway.

Vick is a HUGE brand name. He's easily the most marketable name in the NFL today. Fans love him because of his incredible physical talents, and I'm not denying the guy is a freak of nature. But as an overall QB, I'm sorry but I can name a bunch of guys who are better QBs than Mike Vick and who were more deserving of a Pro Bowl nod.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 11:18 AM   #9
Bozzy
The Starter
 
Bozzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 1,034
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

Chris Cooley should have made the probowl as a TE, what a crock.

Oh well the ProBowl is dumb anyways.
Bozzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 01:41 PM   #10
BigSKINBauer
Pro Bowl
 
BigSKINBauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 38
Posts: 5,688
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW...holm122205.htm
BigSKINBauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 01:58 PM   #11
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigSKINBauer
This guy was giving some serious Redskins love.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 01:51 PM   #12
jdlea
Playmaker
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

How come last week I was wrong for judging people based on stats, which by the way, included wins, but this week all people want to do is use stats to explain why Vick is overrated.

First of all, the Falcons are one of the worst teams in the league without Michael Vick on the field. He may not be a great passer, but he changes games. You can't honestly tell me that you think coaches lose sleep over Mark Brunell or Drew Bledsoe. That's why Vick gets votes. When coaches and players go up against Mike Vick they have to come up with ways to stop him. If I were coming up with a gameplan against the Skins or Boys I would try to make Brunell or Bledsoe beat me.

Second, Vick has no one but Crumpler and Dunn on offense. Don't give me that "he doesn't throw to recievers" nonsense. He doesn't throw to them because they're garbage. He has one legit target. The offense is him and Dunn. That's it.

Vick is the MVP of his team every single season. Without him, we've seen what happens to the Falcons. Michael Vick changes games and people respect what he can do way more than Brunell or Bledsoe.
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 01:53 PM   #13
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdlea
How come last week I was wrong for judging people based on stats, which by the way, included wins, but this week all people want to do is use stats to explain why Vick is overrated.

First of all, the Falcons are one of the worst teams in the league without Michael Vick on the field. He may not be a great passer, but he changes games. You can't honestly tell me that you think coaches lose sleep over Mark Brunell or Drew Bledsoe. That's why Vick gets votes. When coaches and players go up against Mike Vick they have to come up with ways to stop him. If I were coming up with a gameplan against the Skins or Boys I would try to make Brunell or Bledsoe beat me.

Second, Vick has no one but Crumpler and Dunn on offense. Don't give me that "he doesn't throw to recievers" nonsense. He doesn't throw to them because they're garbage. He has one legit target. The offense is him and Dunn. That's it.

Vick is the MVP of his team every single season. Without him, we've seen what happens to the Falcons. Michael Vick changes games and people respect what he can do way more than Brunell or Bledsoe.
He's still overrated.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 01:57 PM   #14
Southpaw
The Starter
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
He's still overrated.
Valid argument. You've changed my view of Michael Vick completely, with that in depth analysis.
Southpaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 02:02 PM   #15
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southpaw
Valid argument. You've changed my view of Michael Vick completely, with that in depth analysis.
I wasn't trying to change anyone's view, but if it changed yours that's great!

That's about as in depth as you have to get with Vick.

He's overrated, simple as that.

His numbers are garbage for a QB. So he wins when he's in the lineup... yeah that's great. Are you telling me Dallas or Washington would have won the same amount of games if you took away Bledsoe and Brunell?

He's a great athlete, but from a pure QB standpoint his name carries him. The Pro Bowl is a popularity contest most of the time so it's not surprising Vick is in, I just don't think it's justified based on his play.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.61931 seconds with 10 queries