![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Redskins Free Agency 2016
Quote:
I think it's even too much to say that when healthy Reed is the clear number one. Remember Reed was healthy in camp and Paul got the starting gig anyway. Think about that. Gruden was seeing what Reed could do in practice throughout camp, yet he gave Paul the starting job. After the call he made on Cousins over Griffin I think we need to give Jay a little credit. I think the gap between Reed and Paul, when both are healthy, is a lot tighter than we think.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pawleys Island SC
Posts: 686
|
Re: Redskins Free Agency 2016
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
|
Re: Redskins Free Agency 2016
I don't think the Skins want to go balls deep with VD.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Redskins Free Agency 2016
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
|
Re: Redskins Free Agency 2016
^ if Niles is 100% he is easily the 2nd TE. The problem is 100% is highly unlikely. Davis is pushing Paulson for time IMO.
Vernon Davis needs someone to light a fire...hopefully someone can on this staff.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Redskins Free Agency 2016
i think niles being #1 in TC doesn't amount to much. reed showed up in games. maybe he just looks bad in practice and that's all it meant. we've heard coaches brag about ryan grant for 2 years and have seen absolutely nothing to back it up in games. being right on kirk doesn't make him infallible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: Redskins Free Agency 2016
We'll see. You may well be right. NP was solid, but not spectacular, at TE for a couple years. However, before last year, Reed had flashed but not been consistent or able to stay on the field. NP suffers a season ending injury and Reed took advantage of the opportunity. Reed is the clear No. 1, but NP should be a more than solid No. 2 TE - plus, he's huge on special teams.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Redskins Free Agency 2016
I definitely think some of you guys here have short memories. I think you're vastly underrating his ability to uncover. Reed took great strides forward this past season, but you need to be reminded that Paul is a very nice mix of blocking AND an ability to uncover.
Niles Paul 2014 Highlights
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 37
Posts: 14,189
|
Re: Redskins Free Agency 2016
Quote:
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,767
|
Re: Redskins Free Agency 2016
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pawleys Island SC
Posts: 686
|
Re: Redskins Free Agency 2016
Quote:
Look at it this way, let's say both were free agents this spring. Who would have been snapped up first, and have gotten the much better contract? See what I mean? As I said earlier, having both is a very nice problem to have... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Redskins Free Agency 2016
Quote:
niles paul: 9.5 yd/gm in 2012, 3.4 yd/gm in 2013, 32 yd/gm in 2014 not sure how jordan isn't the obvious #1. blocking is nice, and i'm sure paul's stat will also improve with cousins too, but reed makes plays that most TEs don't, and it's not like last year was the first time he looked good, it's just the first time he stayed healthy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Redskins Free Agency 2016
Quote:
Comparing Paul's stats from 2012 and 2013 isn't even relevant. In 2014 looking at total yards per game is even stupid because Reed started ahead of him for all but 4 games. But those 4? 4 catches for 86 yards. 8 catches for 99 yards and a TD. 6 catches for 68 yards. 4 catches for 60 yards. That's well over a 1000 yard pace. Listen, I'm not saying that after last season Reed doesn't deserve to be considered our #1 tight end. But Paul really came on in 2014 in subbing for Reed. His blocking is stronger, obv. So if I'm the coach, and Paul is healthy? I probably use Paul before Reed on most 1st and 10s. Now, 2nd and 7? 3rd and 5? I'd use Reed over Paul, if they're not both on the field at the same time. So Reed would end up getting more snaps than Paul for coach Schneed, but Paul would probably start simply because the game starts on a running down - 1st and 10. They're 1 and 1A. I know the Redskins better than all y'all chumps and this proves it. Vernon Davis won't even sniff either of their jocks.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
|
Re: Redskins Free Agency 2016
Quote:
__________________
Life is brutal, but beautiful |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Redskins Free Agency 2016
Quote:
btw, paul had 8 game starts, and most of them were 1 catch for 7 yard affairs. 2 of his games without reed ended up with 17 yards combined, which plunges his projected total down below 900 yards if you're only counting games reed didn't play (you can throw in his 17 yards from the TB game too if you want). i'm not saying he's bad, and obviously kirk is going to help him, but you're not pulling reed for him. if you're managing people and you want to resign reed, pulling him on every 1st and 10 and denying him starts is a great way to make sure that doesn't happen. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|