Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Do you approve of the Redskins' trade up to #2?
Yes 193 91.47%
No 18 8.53%
Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-10-2012, 06:48 PM   #1
SkinzWin
Playmaker
 
SkinzWin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 3,543
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
These guys are 1 and 1a. Both teams win either way.
But RG3's style fits our system better me thinks.
__________________
Sean Taylor #21 a Redskin forever...

Team Heinicke Fan Club
punch it in - CEO
SkinzWin - President
FrenchSkin - VP of Global Operations
ODUsmitty - Director of Cheerleader Fulfillment
Meks - Director of Marketing
SkinzWin is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 06:47 PM   #2
Chief X_Phackter
Pro Bowl
 
Chief X_Phackter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,644
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan View Post
Suppose the unthinkable happens and Indy takes RG3 instead? Talk about the world turning upside down on that day.
I think it is a possibility....although not very likely.

I wouldn't necessarily be upset about it, but at this point I think I prefer RG3.
Chief X_Phackter is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 06:47 PM   #3
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan View Post
Suppose the unthinkable happens and Indy takes RG3 instead? Talk about the world turning upside down on that day.
For RG3.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 06:55 PM   #4
SFREDSKIN
Living Legend
 
SFREDSKIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan View Post
Suppose the unthinkable happens and Indy takes RG3 instead? Talk about the world turning upside down on that day.
That would be awesome, then we can justify the # of picks given away. Luck is still the better QB of the 2, he might not be the athlete RGIII is, but he is a powerful, no nonsense tough guy and just as smart.
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs.

Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory.

Darrell Green- Best DB ever.


Purveyor of fine Filth
SFREDSKIN is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 08:05 PM   #5
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,595
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan View Post
Suppose the unthinkable happens and Indy takes RG3 instead? Talk about the world turning upside down on that day.
I wonder if the Redskins will prepare as if there is a very slim margin Luck will be available, or if they'll contact the Colts to find out if there's a snowball's chance in hell Luck doesn't go #1. I'm pretty certain RG3 will be a Redskin come draft day but the possibility will always exist, at least until the Colts announce they've come to terms with Luck.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 08:11 PM   #6
Alvin Walton
Pro Bowl
 
Alvin Walton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan View Post
Suppose the unthinkable happens and Indy takes RG3 instead? Talk about the world turning upside down on that day.
Well then we could say we didnt actually suck for Luck but got Luck from pure luck.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968
Alvin Walton is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 06:45 PM   #7
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan View Post
Suppose the unthinkable happens and Indy takes RG3 instead? Talk about the world turning upside down on that day.
I'll be just as happy
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 08:00 PM   #8
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

I've got no issues with the trade.. Even with what we gave up, we STILL have 20 picks over the next 3 drafts. People are acting as if we gave up our entire drafts for the next 3 years. I'm not trying to poo-poo the value of a 1st round pick but we've had plenty of first rounders over the past 2 decades and haven't done crap. Plus, I'm considering Jenkins the equivalent of our 2nd round pick this year since he's going to be a rookie essentially.

One of the things I said at the beginning of the offseason is that I was tired of settling at the QB position, either with retread veterans or with second tier rookies. This move was pushing all the chips to the middle of the table and going for it.

The next week will shape the franchise for the next 5-7 years. We have to get first round value/production in free agency at some key positions.

For the naysayers who think that RGIII has to be a Hall of Famer or take us to a Super Bowl in the next 3 years, its gonna suck to be you either way. If he's great, then you were flat wrong about 'wasted picks' or 'overpaying' or whatever else. If he's a bust or mediocre then you get to gloat about your favorite team not succeeding. I'll just choose to be positive and enjoy the ride.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 08:45 PM   #9
NYCskinfan82
Playmaker
 
NYCskinfan82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 56
Posts: 3,803
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
I've got no issues with the trade.. Even with what we gave up, we STILL have 20 picks over the next 3 drafts. People are acting as if we gave up our entire drafts for the next 3 years. I'm not trying to poo-poo the value of a 1st round pick but we've had plenty of first rounders over the past 2 decades and haven't done crap. Plus, I'm considering Jenkins the equivalent of our 2nd round pick this year since he's going to be a rookie essentially.

One of the things I said at the beginning of the offseason is that I was tired of settling at the QB position, either with retread veterans or with second tier rookies. This move was pushing all the chips to the middle of the table and going for it.

The next week will shape the franchise for the next 5-7 years. We have to get first round value/production in free agency at some key positions.

For the naysayers who think that RGIII has to be a Hall of Famer or take us to a Super Bowl in the next 3 years, its gonna suck to be you either way. If he's great, then you were flat wrong about 'wasted picks' or 'overpaying' or whatever else. If he's a bust or mediocre then you get to gloat about your favorite team not succeeding. I'll just choose to be positive and enjoy the ride.
Good stuff, nice read.
NYCskinfan82 is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 09:01 PM   #10
joeski27
Camp Scrub
 
joeski27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 10
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Ok, my first ever post on the WP forums (yay!), and to commemorate it, I wanted to post the product of some late night photoshopping. Been wanting to put this together for a while now, and now that the trade has been made, I thought I'd finally do it. But first I apparently have to have 10 posts in the books, so here are a few quick ones before I can post the photo link...
joeski27 is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 09:01 PM   #11
joeski27
Camp Scrub
 
joeski27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 10
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

And another...
joeski27 is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 09:02 PM   #12
joeski27
Camp Scrub
 
joeski27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 10
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

and a third post...(sorry, but I didn't make the 10 post rule)...
joeski27 is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 09:02 PM   #13
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by joeski27 View Post
And another...
I would recommend visiting other threads and making comments instead of doing this. Just a tip. Lots of stuff to comment on in here.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 08:05 PM   #14
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,220
I honestly think I rather RG3 over Luck. Seems to fit our system better.

If you are Luck or RG3 you would hope to go to Washington over Indy
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline  
Old 03-10-2012, 08:07 PM   #15
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

I have no major issues with the trade itself, outside of the fact that the Rams are clear winners and the Redskins are...well, they're on the side they always are. But in the context of the last three years, it says a lot about a lot. And I don't feel like the bad guy for stating the obvious.

The trade itself can be easily justified by the player who they traded for being the player they expect him to be. The problem is with the expectations. I feel a LOT better about the trade since outside observers have weighed in basically supporting the fact that this move works, schematically. Clearly, it's not just Shanahan on an island here with the Shanaclan fans, it's a lot of people who analyze the league for a living who think that when it's all said and done, this will work.

In general though, you don't want to get caught making trades that you basically can't win, and your intention is that if everything goes as planned, you won't look foolish. Noting ever goes as planned for these guys, which leaves me with reservation. But it's tempered reservation because: a lot of people who aren't the Shanahan's like this move and think that it's only a matter of time before Griffin is the most popular guy in town.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.09536 seconds with 11 queries