Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: What should the Redskins do with Cousins?
Sign him to a long term deal 47 75.81%
Let him walk 4 6.45%
Use the franchise tag again 11 17.74%
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-03-2016, 05:23 PM   #1
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Cousins gonna be a skin for a long time
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline  
Old 11-03-2016, 06:53 PM   #2
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

People need to read the Jones link a little more carefully. He's offering up his opinion. Take from it what you will.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Old 11-03-2016, 07:16 PM   #3
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
People need to read the Jones link a little more carefully. He's offering up his opinion. Take from it what you will.
Wow, it's almost like this story is making the rounds like he has a source inside the organization saying they don't like Cousins as a long term solution!
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline  
Old 11-03-2016, 07:29 PM   #4
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
People need to read the Jones link a little more carefully. He's offering up his opinion. Take from it what you will.
You mean like part of the article?


Quote:
"For right now, Kirk has not done enough to show what you need to see to give that guy $50 million guaranteed," he said. "He's playing like an $18 million quarterback right now."

"Is that your opinion, or have you talked to people in the organization?" Jason Bishop asked.

"That's my educated opinion," Jones responded
CRedskinsRule is offline  
Old 11-04-2016, 11:59 AM   #5
NC_Skins
Gamebreaker
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,755
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
People need to read the Jones link a little more carefully. He's offering up his opinion. Take from it what you will.
Talking with SS though, he believes they are still unsure of paying him.


Let's throw some more fuel on this fire...lol

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sport...f04_story.html


Some key points I agree on:

Quote:
And all of this means . . . what? The numbers look heavy, but for half a season, they have felt flimsy. Washington is just a middle-of-the-pack scoring team. Cousins still makes too many mistakes and squanders too many opportunities.

I also think this is a valid point. Not necessarily that scoring is all on Cousins, but he's left little to desire in red zone efficiency this year.

Quote:
This is how you build the case that Cousins is an empty stat collector. This is how you figure he is the creation of Gruden and an offensive staff that runs one of the most clever systems in the NFL. This is how you look at Washington’s poor red-zone performance this season and conclude that the quarterback doesn’t do enough when the passing windows are tighter and daring decision-making and moxie factor into performance.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty
NC_Skins is offline  
Old 11-04-2016, 12:13 PM   #6
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,394
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins View Post
Talking with SS though, he believes they are still unsure of paying him.





Let's throw some more fuel on this fire...lol



https://www.washingtonpost.com/sport...f04_story.html





Some key points I agree on:









I also think this is a valid point. Not necessarily that scoring is all on Cousins, but he's left little to desire in red zone efficiency this year.


Cousins has not looked flimsy for half the year. That is just false.
It is 90% play calling that is killing us in the red zone.
punch it in is offline  
Old 11-04-2016, 12:32 PM   #7
NC_Skins
Gamebreaker
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,755
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by punch it in View Post
Cousins has not looked flimsy for half the year. That is just false.
It is 90% play calling that is killing us in the red zone.

I don't think they said that Cousins looked flimsy for half the year. Here is the actual quote

Quote:
The numbers look heavy, but for half a season, they have felt flimsy.

In other words, we have a lot of yardage, but they don't equate to points.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty
NC_Skins is offline  
Old 11-04-2016, 12:45 PM   #8
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,394
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins View Post
I don't think they said that Cousins looked flimsy for half the year. Here is the actual quote









In other words, we have a lot of yardage, but they don't equate to points.


Yup. Our entire issue on offense is rz. I say that is way more on coaches than any player.
punch it in is offline  
Old 11-04-2016, 11:45 PM   #9
DYoungJelly
The Starter
 
DYoungJelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,300
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by punch it in View Post
It is 90% play calling that is killing us in the red zone.
Check yourself, they are going to complete a fade with a dude who hasn't practiced all summer before the end of the year!!!!!!!!

In all seriousness, I think McVay outsmarts himself sometimes.

Other times, like the read option against Detroit, the dude is brilliant.
__________________
I'm tired of these monkey fighting snakes on this Monday to Friday plane!
DYoungJelly is offline  
Old 11-05-2016, 06:51 AM   #10
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,394
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by DYoungJelly View Post
Check yourself, they are going to complete a fade with a dude who hasn't practiced all summer before the end of the year!!!!!!!!



In all seriousness, I think McVay outsmarts himself sometimes.



Other times, like the read option against Detroit, the dude is brilliant.


The never ending fade attempt reminds me of the toss sweep from a few years back. I want to say it was Zorn? There was the one season where we just never gave up on the toss sweep in short yardage situations, and never got the first down either. Teams would just blow it up for a loss.
punch it in is offline  
Old 11-03-2016, 10:52 PM   #11
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,394
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Here we go again......does anybody really want to save a few million and sink back into the wonderful world of stop gap qb's for 10 years? The guy is fresh off of one of his better games and this shit appears like a fart that has been trapped under the covers all night. Wtf.
We are in a position not only to lock up a top 10 qb in KC (and that will be completely clear by years end), but also to draft a full compliment of players (still a relatively new thing in DC), and have enough cap space to pay our own and maybe add a piece or two to the puzzle. To keep a TEAM together with its coaching staff. Instead lets let him walk, and fuck it all up. Brilliant. This team is right on the cusp of being a true contender. Let it grow!
punch it in is offline  
Old 11-04-2016, 04:04 PM   #12
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,592
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

I would probably agree that KC doesn't take enough chances or isn't aggressive enough. There's probably some truth to that. I think in his first few years when he was spot starting, he had more gunslinger in him. But after all the interceptions and getting benched because of them, he plays a lot more conservative.
skinsfan69 is offline  
Old 11-04-2016, 04:28 PM   #13
metalskins
The Starter
 
metalskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,464
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Let's think about this logically though. What free agent quarterback would be available next year that is an upgrade from Cousins? I see absolutely nobody. Unless Bill Belichick did the unthinkable and decided to trade an aging Tom Brady (who doesn't appear to be aging by the way), who would the 'skins get? Would you see Dallas trading Romo to Washington? I doubt it. Sanchez to Washington? He couldn't beat out the no-name guy in Denver.

I'm sorry, but you don't have to have an Aaron Rodgers or a Tom Brady to win Super Bowls. Yes, having those guys makes it a heck of a lot easier to win it all, but look at the teams that have won the Super Bowl with less than spectacular quarterbacks. Heck, I don't think Eli Manning is an elite QB and he's won two Super Bowls.

Maybe it's a homer thing to say, but I think Cousins is as good as we can get right now. I think you stick with him for a few more years.
__________________
Reserved for a witty signature.
metalskins is offline  
Old 11-04-2016, 05:08 PM   #14
los panda
Pro Bowl
 
los panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by metalskins View Post
Let's think about this logically though. What free agent quarterback would be available next year that is an upgrade from Cousins? I see absolutely nobody. Unless Bill Belichick did the unthinkable and decided to trade an aging Tom Brady (who doesn't appear to be aging by the way), who would the 'skins get? Would you see Dallas trading Romo to Washington? I doubt it. Sanchez to Washington? He couldn't beat out the no-name guy in Denver.

I'm sorry, but you don't have to have an Aaron Rodgers or a Tom Brady to win Super Bowls. Yes, having those guys makes it a heck of a lot easier to win it all, but look at the teams that have won the Super Bowl with less than spectacular quarterbacks. Heck, I don't think Eli Manning is an elite QB and he's won two Super Bowls.

Maybe it's a homer thing to say, but I think Cousins is as good as we can get right now. I think you stick with him for a few more years.
totally agree, keep kirk cuh.

but cookie patterson out of uc stalingrad is looking real good. could snag the davey o'brien award.
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81
los panda is offline  
Old 11-04-2016, 09:13 PM   #15
SolidSnake84
Playmaker
 
SolidSnake84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Stephens City, VA
Posts: 2,953
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by metalskins View Post
Let's think about this logically though. What free agent quarterback would be available next year that is an upgrade from Cousins? I see absolutely nobody. Unless Bill Belichick did the unthinkable and decided to trade an aging Tom Brady (who doesn't appear to be aging by the way), who would the 'skins get? Would you see Dallas trading Romo to Washington? I doubt it. Sanchez to Washington? He couldn't beat out the no-name guy in Denver.

I'm sorry, but you don't have to have an Aaron Rodgers or a Tom Brady to win Super Bowls. Yes, having those guys makes it a heck of a lot easier to win it all, but look at the teams that have won the Super Bowl with less than spectacular quarterbacks. Heck, I don't think Eli Manning is an elite QB and he's won two Super Bowls.

Maybe it's a homer thing to say, but I think Cousins is as good as we can get right now. I think you stick with him for a few more years.
When people ask me about this at work, the answer i give is that they would go forward with McCoy because you have him locked up under a LOW contract i believe for the next two years, which fits the mold for Scott M not wanting to spend big money that could affect building the rest of the team.

First let me clarify that I AM NOT SAYING that McCoy could do just as well as Cousins in this system, because i don't think anyone truly knows. Gruden was committed 100% to Cousins in the offseason so I don't think anyone was truly looking at Colt to see how good he was or wasn't. Chris Cooley during his preseason broadcasts was high on Colt and felt that McCoy could start for at least half a dozen teams for sure, and maybe another five or 6 have a chance to battle for the starting job.

So in this scenario Scott M decides to not pay Cousins, they let him walk after this season, and so next season you open the season with Colt McCoy as the day 1 starter. If he plays well and the skins do well, then they look like geniuses because they saved the big money to use to load up on other players. You wont have a money issue until its time for Colt to get a new deal. Obviously if Colt fails then you turn to Sudfield to see what you have in him. If he plays well, then you may have a solution for a while, until it comes contract time and then maybe it's rinse and repeat with whatever possible QB's you have on the roster at that time.

Say for example this works, i wonder if it would change how the league pays QB's. What i am getting at - if a team can get quality / solid play out of QB's who sign lower money contracts, then what is the need to pay a guy 25 - 30 million a season if a team is able to win, or go to a Superbowl with a guy who is only making 2 or 3 million? You could then use that money to load up on other talent...
__________________
Time to nut up or shut up
SolidSnake84 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.07890 seconds with 11 queries