|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-11-2006, 03:57 PM | #46 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,576
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
Rogers wasn't matched up against the other team's #1 WRs all the time last year either. I know people always want to keep digging for reasons, but the reasons are simple. We've lost two key defenders in Springs and Prioleau.
Look at how different the offense was minus just one guy in Portis. |
Advertisements |
10-11-2006, 04:01 PM | #47 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,233
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
Is he doing that this year? I thought he just defended one side of the field. If so, then that would make more sense.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
10-11-2006, 05:03 PM | #48 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 183
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
I keep hearing how Rogers is young, but most good corners are good the first day they put them on the field
|
10-11-2006, 05:04 PM | #49 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,233
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
I would totally disagree with that statement. D'Angelo Hall (arguably one of the top three in the game) got SMOKED his first year with the Falcons, I could go on and on and on with this list.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
10-11-2006, 06:05 PM | #50 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,576
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
Quote:
I'll guarantee you that most corners struggle initially. |
|
10-11-2006, 06:17 PM | #51 | |
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
Quote:
__________________
Vacancy |
|
10-11-2006, 06:19 PM | #52 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 183
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
Champ Bailey, Darrell Green, Fred Smoot, Antoine Winfield.
Ed Reed One of his best year, was his first. 2002Baltimore Ravens168571.0141516733.45907 Dawkins had on of his best years as rookie also. I have seen maney safties get better as they got older, but most corner backs get a little better within the first three years and then get worse as they get slower. |
10-11-2006, 07:51 PM | #53 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,576
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
Quote:
If it's so easy to play corner right from the start, I want to see alot more examples than just the obvious ones. |
|
10-11-2006, 08:05 PM | #54 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 183
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
I knew that they were safties. I was just pointing out that it is easier to teach a saftey, than a corner. I looked at numerous corners, most played their first year. You show me some good corners that spent two or three years playing shitty, and got a whole lot better. Carlos is doing OK, but will never be great.
|
10-12-2006, 06:48 AM | #55 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
Quote:
|
|
10-12-2006, 06:59 AM | #56 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Fayettenam, NC
Age: 52
Posts: 806
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
Quote:
lets see if i can name them. lets start with carlos " i get burnt weekly" rogers, not to mention adam " i got way too much money" archeleta, and andre " i probably should be playing linebacker" carter. Those three right there will make you forget about warrick holdman.
__________________
The future is obviously right now! |
|
10-12-2006, 10:14 AM | #57 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,576
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
Quote:
Same goes for the D. Springs' return won't guarantee the D doing a complete 180, but I'll certainly rather take my chances with him vs. without him. As far as ragging on CP for his costumes, that's just silly. It didn't have any sort of negative effect when they won 5 in a row to close out the season last year, did it? Trying to correlate dressing up on Thursday to losing concentration in the game is assanine and just another example of you trying to take a lame shot at Portis. |
|
10-12-2006, 12:20 PM | #58 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
CP sure lapsed last season when he dressed up and we won 5 straight! got a bunch of 100yd games too.
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader. |
10-13-2006, 03:42 PM | #59 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 40
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
I love CP, he's the man
|
10-17-2006, 05:09 PM | #60 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 40
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
We better see McIntosh this weekend.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|