Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-11-2006, 03:57 PM   #46
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,576
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

Rogers wasn't matched up against the other team's #1 WRs all the time last year either. I know people always want to keep digging for reasons, but the reasons are simple. We've lost two key defenders in Springs and Prioleau.

Look at how different the offense was minus just one guy in Portis.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-11-2006, 04:01 PM   #47
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,233
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

Is he doing that this year? I thought he just defended one side of the field. If so, then that would make more sense.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2006, 05:03 PM   #48
chris36
Special Teams
 
chris36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 183
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

I keep hearing how Rogers is young, but most good corners are good the first day they put them on the field
chris36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2006, 05:04 PM   #49
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,233
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

I would totally disagree with that statement. D'Angelo Hall (arguably one of the top three in the game) got SMOKED his first year with the Falcons, I could go on and on and on with this list.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2006, 06:05 PM   #50
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,576
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris36 View Post
I keep hearing how Rogers is young, but most good corners are good the first day they put them on the field
Let's hear your list of corners that hit the ground running.

I'll guarantee you that most corners struggle initially.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2006, 06:17 PM   #51
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Rogers wasn't matched up against the other team's #1 WRs all the time last year either. I know people always want to keep digging for reasons, but the reasons are simple. We've lost two key defenders in Springs and Prioleau.

Look at how different the offense was minus just one guy in Portis.
Our offense was not all too great all our playmaker towards the end of the season.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2006, 06:19 PM   #52
chris36
Special Teams
 
chris36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 183
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

Champ Bailey, Darrell Green, Fred Smoot, Antoine Winfield.



Ed Reed One of his best year, was his first.
2002Baltimore Ravens168571.0141516733.45907

Dawkins had on of his best years as rookie also. I have seen maney safties get better as they got older, but most corner backs get a little better within the first three years and then get worse as they get slower.
chris36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2006, 07:51 PM   #53
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,576
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris36 View Post
Champ Bailey, Darrell Green, Fred Smoot, Antoine Winfield.



Ed Reed One of his best year, was his first.
2002Baltimore Ravens168571.0141516733.45907

Dawkins had on of his best years as rookie also. I have seen maney safties get better as they got older, but most corner backs get a little better within the first three years and then get worse as they get slower.
You seem to be pointing out exceptions to the rule, and Reed and Dawkins are safeties not corners.

If it's so easy to play corner right from the start, I want to see alot more examples than just the obvious ones.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2006, 08:05 PM   #54
chris36
Special Teams
 
chris36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 183
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

I knew that they were safties. I was just pointing out that it is easier to teach a saftey, than a corner. I looked at numerous corners, most played their first year. You show me some good corners that spent two or three years playing shitty, and got a whole lot better. Carlos is doing OK, but will never be great.
chris36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2006, 06:48 AM   #55
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Rogers wasn't matched up against the other team's #1 WRs all the time last year either. I know people always want to keep digging for reasons, but the reasons are simple. We've lost two key defenders in Springs and Prioleau.

Look at how different the offense was minus just one guy in Portis.
Correct me if I am wrong, Portis did play last week didn't he? We scored 3 points, but we do have Clinton to thank for that, after all it was his dropped pass on a simple throw for a firstdown inside the Giant 10 yard line that allowed us to have to kick that fieldgoal. Perhaps he might take the work week a little more seriously instead of trying to figure out what kind of costume to wear, he might not have that type of lapse of concentration!
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2006, 06:59 AM   #56
vaoutlaws2006
Impact Rookie
 
vaoutlaws2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Fayettenam, NC
Age: 52
Posts: 806
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Let's just bench or cut everyone and call it a season.

There are other guys playing worse than Holdman.


lets see if i can name them. lets start with carlos " i get burnt weekly" rogers, not to mention adam " i got way too much money" archeleta, and andre " i probably should be playing linebacker" carter. Those three right there will make you forget about warrick holdman.
__________________
The future is obviously right now!
vaoutlaws2006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2006, 10:14 AM   #57
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,576
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

Quote:
Originally Posted by offiss View Post
Correct me if I am wrong, Portis did play last week didn't he? We scored 3 points, but we do have Clinton to thank for that, after all it was his dropped pass on a simple throw for a firstdown inside the Giant 10 yard line that allowed us to have to kick that fieldgoal. Perhaps he might take the work week a little more seriously instead of trying to figure out what kind of costume to wear, he might not have that type of lapse of concentration!
I'm not saying every game with Portis in the lineup is a guaranteed win, but we're certainly a MUCH better team with him vs. without. I'm sure that even you can admit as much, well probably not.

Same goes for the D. Springs' return won't guarantee the D doing a complete 180, but I'll certainly rather take my chances with him vs. without him.

As far as ragging on CP for his costumes, that's just silly. It didn't have any sort of negative effect when they won 5 in a row to close out the season last year, did it?

Trying to correlate dressing up on Thursday to losing concentration in the game is assanine and just another example of you trying to take a lame shot at Portis.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2006, 12:20 PM   #58
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

CP sure lapsed last season when he dressed up and we won 5 straight! got a bunch of 100yd games too.
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2006, 03:42 PM   #59
CPDAMAN
Camp Scrub
 
CPDAMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 40
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

I love CP, he's the man
CPDAMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2006, 05:09 PM   #60
CPDAMAN
Camp Scrub
 
CPDAMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 40
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage

We better see McIntosh this weekend.
CPDAMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.37119 seconds with 10 queries