![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 3,815
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
yeah, the only way it'd be possible is if we offered our entire secondary or something though
![]() SD has much more pressing needs than one good CB at $65 mill (or whatever it was). |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Age: 54
Posts: 960
|
It's obvious the trade is beneficial to both teams, my hope is that we meet them in the Super Bowl soon and settle it on the field.
As far as the debate about who is the more talented corner, I'd say Ty Law is probably the best just because he always seems to be making plays. That said, I think changing systems every year has severely stunted Champ's growth, and LaVar's as well. It takes time to foster trust and to really understand the point that coaches are trying to make, witness LaVar's statements about Marvin Lewis playing him at end. I can respect Champ wanting to leave the Skins because there's no way he can have the same passion that we fans do about the team because for him it is his real life and career. When Gibbs came back all of us welcomed him with open arms because we believe that Snyder finally has brought us stability. But it's a lot easier to judge from the outside looking in. From Champ's perspective things must look a lot differently, he witnessed a lot of turnover and this last move might seem brilliant to all of us but to him it might have been the straw that broke the camel's back. No matter. In the end, we do lose a great corner but we pick up a darned good one in Springs. And we also get a great back in Portis, so I'll take my chances with CP. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
right, people keep trying to figure out who got the better end of the deal, but honestly, I think both teams came out ahead.
champ was NOT going to stay here, so we got a top five running game out of it... something we desperately needed, and something gibbs would hate to be without. Champ was replaced by extensive secondary depth which should counteract his loss. denver got an improved secondary so its no longer the sad excuse it was... they gave up a big back who was (rightfully) a bit miffed about earning minimum wage... they lost him, but already had good depth at RB and a good O-line to help out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 410
|
Champ was going to leave the Skins one way or another - so I say good riddence to that ass-monkey!
I think Smoot & Springs will be a great tandem - but I also think they will be unfairly scrutinized if our D-Line doesn't apply much pressure to the QB. If the QB has enough time, you could have two Darell Green's back there and they'll get beat from time to time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hartselle, Alabama
Age: 85
Posts: 659
|
Quote:
Even if Champ has a better season in Denver than he had last year, he will not have NEARLY the "impact" a stud RB would have. One very good CB? There are lots of other places on the field to throw - you can effectively take him out of the game. But a stud RB takes the game to the defense, and will impact every game.
__________________
John Shaffer National Fantasy Sports Leagues, Inc. Home of "The BEST Game In Town" since 1990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Age: 54
Posts: 960
|
Quote:
What greater irony is there than the Broncos being able to plug in any back and have a successful running game after ALL those years of struggling to find any back to run when Elway was there? Or am I just showing my age again? BTW, I just love the Frerotte icon. What a maroon!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
right, star CBs are much rarer, but their overall impact on a team isn't nearly as noticeable. I'd pick portis every time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 44
Posts: 5,455
|
haha, i never even thought of that as a freotte icon, awesome.
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 44
Posts: 5,455
|
yea, russel didnt play hardly at all. And if anything Smith made our defense worth because of all the trouble and rifts he was causing. Smith would just walk out on plays because he was tired, or got his sack and didnt care anymore. Having four dlinemen that try is an upgrade. Griffin is a fighter and gives his all, he didnt get teh sacks last year but he caused pressure. Hopefully daniels and griffin will live up to their form from two years ago
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Dan Wilkinson and Jessie Armstead said something pretty interesting a couple of years ago, during Marvin Lewis' year with the team. I don't remember exactly what they said, but the gist of it was
"We have to make certain adjustments when Bruce is out there with us. We have to compensate for him, because his concern isn't adjusting to the system, it's getting to the quarterback. But that's cool because he's a Hall-of-Famer and he's going after the record" So yeah, Bruce Smith racked up a lot of sacks but at what cost to the team? I know, you wouldn't think sacks would be detrimental to the team but I suppose they could be right?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hartselle, Alabama
Age: 85
Posts: 659
|
Quote:
__________________
John Shaffer National Fantasy Sports Leagues, Inc. Home of "The BEST Game In Town" since 1990 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|