|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
10-25-2007, 06:00 PM
|
#1 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 878
|
Re: Trading #85
I really doubt that the bengals trade him....I just can't see that happening. But they are in DESPERATE need of some of defense...so who knows. I really find it odd that Marvin Lewis can't get that D any better than it is.
|
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 07:56 PM
|
#2 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
|
Re: Trading #85
CJ is not a redskin style of player. The grandstanding has never been the character for WR's as much as Gibbs has lead at the helm. Gary Clark was the most spirited WR's an he spoke volumes with his ablility on the field. Chad is a talented player who doesn't understand when people are laughing with him and when they are laughing at him. The later is more accurate when your'e not winning.
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970 |
|
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 08:02 PM
|
#3 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 56
Posts: 559
|
Re: Trading #85
I see him going to philly before coming here.
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 08:11 PM
|
#4 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Trading #85
If a 4th rounder could net Randy Moss, I give no more than a 3rd for Chad Johnson.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 08:29 PM
|
#5 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1
|
Re: Trading #85
Cincy will never trade Johnson...Skins need to stop investing in the WR position and use the guys they have
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 09:10 PM
|
#6 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
|
Re: Trading #85
I love chad Johnson. No way Joe Gibbs has him on our team, but he would be the next best thing to moss. He also would cost a first rounder. He is not like Moss who had done nothing for three years. He is still the second best receiver in the game today
. |
|
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 10:07 PM
|
#7 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 42
Posts: 2,726
|
Re: Trading #85
what are we the lions? they invested 4 first rounders in recievers 4 outta they last 5 drafts. do we really need another reciever to come here and have zero touchdown passes to go along with our other 3 receivers that have contracts over 30 million? Next year we are going to need CBs and Liineman. SAVE OUR PICKS.....
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 11:57 PM
|
#8 |
|
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Trading #85
When I first saw the title of this thread, I thought it was referring to Brandon Lloyd! I laughed out loud and said, "for what, a coke and a smile?" Ha!
__________________
Tardy |
|
|
|
|
10-26-2007, 10:13 AM
|
#9 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Trading #85
In case I'm judging your sarcasm correctly or not... are you saying that since those picks haven't worked out we should just give up on drafting WRs?
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
10-26-2007, 10:15 AM
|
#10 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 726
|
Re: Trading #85
I'm not sure Gibbs would mesh well with Hall of fame class of ???
Is he more anican than vader? Meaning, do you see him as being more Portis type "fun" or does he have some TO destructiveness in him?
__________________
in writing these daily letters and trying to make them interesting it is always possible that some sentiment may occur which has not received the severe and deliberate scrutiny and reconsideration which should attach to a State Paper. - Churchill |
|
|
|
|
10-26-2007, 10:45 AM
|
#11 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 70
Posts: 868
|
Re: Trading #85
I was hoping this thread was discussing the options of trading Brandon Lloyd. The is no way the Redskins would ever sign Chad Johnson. He is not a Gibbs type player. Nor would Chad Johnson want to go to Washington. If I were the Bengals, I would demand a ridiculous trade offer.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS" |
|
|
|
|
10-26-2007, 11:09 AM
|
#12 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 726
|
Re: Trading #85
what kind of value do you think we'd get for lloyd? i mean, we gave up a 4th rounder right? he's done nothing for us...the best thing we'd have going for us by trading him is to shed salary. I'd say 6 rounder at best...
__________________
in writing these daily letters and trying to make them interesting it is always possible that some sentiment may occur which has not received the severe and deliberate scrutiny and reconsideration which should attach to a State Paper. - Churchill |
|
|
|
|
10-26-2007, 05:07 PM
|
#13 |
|
No new threads for you
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Moneytown
Posts: 127
|
Re: Trading #85
In all honesty this might be Gibbs last season if he doesn't make a move close to the super bowl his contract is up after this season so this talk about CJ not being a Gibb-type player might not matter.
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2007, 05:28 PM
|
#14 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Trading #85
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2007, 05:32 PM
|
#15 | |
|
No new threads for you
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Moneytown
Posts: 127
|
Re: Trading #85
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
