![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Spagnoulo or Fassel: who's your pick? | |||
| Spagnoulo |
|
127 | 80.89% |
| Fassel |
|
30 | 19.11% |
| Voters: 157. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Camden, N.C.
Posts: 7
|
Re: Spagnuolo or Fassel?
Fassell Sucks- Spags hands down
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
|
Re: Spagnuolo or Fassel?
There seems to be this logic floating around of young coach = long term answer.
What is long term in this league anyways? Face it, no matter who takes over he will realistically have about 3 seasons to show that the team is moving forward and making progress. Whoever gets the job has to win regardless of age. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Spagnuolo or Fassel?
In the interest of being right, Jim Fassel.
Spags needs to prove he can do his job in the New York Media market for longer than one season. Fassel did it for seven.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 55
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: Spagnuolo or Fassel?
Spags did good things in the league 3 days ago...Fassel has not done anything good in the league in 7 years.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,380
|
Re: Spagnuolo or Fassel?
I say let's go with Spags. Young guy, hungry to show what he has as a coach. We're a defensive minded team, so we might as well continue with that. If Spags doesn't work, then Snyder can go after Cowher. If Spags does work out, then he has a coach for the next 10 years (hopefully). Fassel already had his time with the Giants, but that was a long time ago. Also, someone mentioned how Spags would be a Redskins coach, unlike Fassel or even Mooch, coaches from other teams who are now with the Redskins. Mark my words, if DS picks Fassell, and if he doesn't work out, the same people in here that are "ok with Fassell" will be blasting DS for picking him.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,644
|
Re: Spagnuolo or Fassel?
I'm saying Spagnuolo is going to be the guy, but I think Fassel is the better choice.
Did anyone know that Spags first gig in the NFL was with Washington in 1983 as a player personal intern? Guess he will have come full circle should he get the job. I'm still routing for Fassel, but Spagnuolo is somewhat intriguing. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: Spagnuolo or Fassel?
Not sure i care anymore. Let's just hire a HC and get started w/ next season. I'm just ready to start being a fan again. I'm not really sure if our HC matters that much seeing we already have all coaches in place. Please hire somebody soon!!
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Spagnuolo or Fassel?
Fassel.. Our offense needs more development than our defense and he's got a long history of developing young QB..
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Beaufort SC
Age: 47
Posts: 933
|
Re: Spagnuolo or Fassel?
I'm on the Spag wagon. I'm wondering what will be done with the current players we have on deck, but if he gets the job I'm sure he'll do fine by everyone. I'm not sure he's ready, but let's put him to the test.
Whoever we do sign, how long do you think we sign them for?
__________________
We are always superbowl contenders in March!!! HTTR!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mt. Laurel, NJ
Age: 38
Posts: 353
|
Re: Spagnuolo or Fassel?
definitely spags i think we need a young HC who will be here for a long time. Only thing i have to say is that when you have strahan umenyiora and tuck on your d line your defense better be pretty good, so i think spag is getting a little too much credit there but i still think he is the best choice
__________________
Hail Redskins!!! |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: Spagnuolo or Fassel?
Quote:
I didn't know that til i read it today. I thought he was a few years younger than 48. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 39
Posts: 16,867
|
Re: Spagnuolo or Fassel?
I dunno. Whatever. Whoever gets us to the Super Bowl. I can't be bothered trying to figure out which one is more qualified. But the West Coast offense is already set so its probably going to be Fassel.
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best. I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 721
|
Re: Spagnuolo or Fassel?
One thing to consider - I read that Blache was almost ready to retire so maybe getting Spags or Meeks would be the better option if Blache decides to hang it up sooner or later. Anyone know how old Blache is?
I am at the point of just hire a coach soon and hope whomever they hire can have great success. If it is Fassel than I'll support him. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Spagnuolo or Fassel?
While I haven't been a fan favorite of second chance coaches, history has proven that second chance coaches can deliver first rate results. Someone once said [quote] "If recycling can save the Earth, then recycling NFL head coaches can save a franchise.
There is no substitute for head coaching experience. The enormity of the job is such that an assistant coach can't possibly fully prepare for it. The ideal head coach candidate not only has NFL head coaching experience, but has at some point in time been successful in the NFL. Sometimes their shortcomings are exposed in the course of losing, but more often than not they emerge better prepared for another opportunity. The team that hires a coach on the rebound is at a better vantage point to identify the coach's weaknesses and structure the organization to minimize them, and the coach has a better idea of where to seek help. Spagnuolo is an assistant, what assistant coaches and cooordinators do is totally different from what a head coaches does. Coordinators call plays, put in game plans and work basically with one side of the ball where a HC has to have knowledge of every aspect of the program including special teams, weight program, media and so forth. Hiring an NFL coordinator with no HC experience at any level involves a lot of projection, and projection can be risky. The idea is to hire a coach who after careful study, you feel gives you the best chance to win. |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Spagnuolo or Fassel?
Quote:
I'm all for giving coaches opportunities, such as Jim Zorn for QB Coach to Offensive Coordinator, but at the head coach level I'd rather these guys cut their teeth elsewhere (such as, oh I don't know, New York for seven years) before assuming the mantle of Redskins Head Coach.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|