Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


There's No Quarterback Controversy

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-02-2008, 12:00 AM   #1
53Fan
Franchise Player
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
^^^ Sorry for the freak-out. I just keep seeing that people aren't acknowledging what/who we have at the HC position.
Thats alright Goat...you're just "playing" with heart.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it!
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 11:52 PM   #2
53Fan
Franchise Player
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Wasn't there a thread a couple of weeks ago about how we should hurry up and sign Jason to a big contract? Seems like fans want to either hurry up and sign him or hurry up and bench him. Instant gratification in football is a myth. It doesn't work. Danny tried that his first few years as owner. We have a first year coach and a QB playing in a new system. Let's get some linemen and keep building. The NY fans were ready to dump Eli long time ago. Not so much now.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it!
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 11:53 PM   #3
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by 53Fan View Post
Wasn't there a thread a couple of weeks ago about how we should hurry up and sign Jason to a big contract? Seems like fans want to either hurry up and sign him or hurry up and bench him. Instant gratification in football is a myth. It doesn't work. Danny tried that his first few years as owner. We have a first year coach and a QB playing in a new system. Let's get some linemen and keep building. The NY fans were ready to dump Eli long time ago. Not so much now.
Good post, and just to quote JLC one last time I think he echos the same view pretty well here:

Quote:
I find it odd that a team that has over-achieved in terms of its record in the eyes of many, is allegedly being held back by the same QB who was among the top eight in the NFL at the midpoint of the season. I'm not buying it. Not even close. Fundamental issues of personnel and scheme adjustment are overarching principles, and no one player is going to overcome that.

To retard the development of Campbell, again, just to hand the team over to Todd Collins strikes me as absurd. This season, realistically, was never about winning the Super Bowl, or even winning the division. They weren't built for that. It's about building a solid program and growing into an offense and identity on that side of the ball that could stand up over time, and developing a quarterback who has the physical and mental tools to be very good for years to come.

Don't lose sight of that.
Have some patience folks.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 11:54 PM   #4
prinzeofmoval
Special Teams
 
prinzeofmoval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by 53Fan View Post
Wasn't there a thread a couple of weeks ago about how we should hurry up and sign Jason to a big contract? Seems like fans want to either hurry up and sign him or hurry up and bench him. Instant gratification in football is a myth. It doesn't work. Danny tried that his first few years as owner. We have a first year coach and a QB playing in a new system. Let's get some linemen and keep building. The NY fans were ready to dump Eli long time ago. Not so much now.
Qb is a thankless job. When you're winning thats because its your job when you lose the guy behind you can do better. Ask Derek Anderson.
__________________
I laugh at you Colt Brennan haters. You're the same guys who didn't wanna bench Brunell for Campbell. The tables will turn.
prinzeofmoval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 08:35 AM   #5
rypper11
The Starter
 
rypper11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,228
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by prinzeofmoval View Post
Qb is a thankless job. When you're winning thats because its your job when you lose the guy behind you can do better. Ask Derek Anderson.
Or McNabb. A bad game (or two) does not make a season or a career.
__________________
Playing a kids game for a kings ransom.
rypper11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 12:05 AM   #6
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Fans are stupid. JC improved alot from last year, give him atleast a year with one system. Sure go get a good backup for competition next camp, but now let him do his thing.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 12:00 PM   #7
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

It would be a huge mistake to replace JC at this point in the season and I am certain that Zorn & Co. wont do it.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 01:27 PM   #8
charlielyons
Special Teams
 
charlielyons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 394
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

what has campbell done good besides not turnover the ball. he is playing a back up role now which is dont turn the ball over and dont lose the game.
charlielyons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 01:48 PM   #9
Dblock804
Special Teams
 
Dblock804's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Richmond
Posts: 143
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

I agree, time for Colt. It's not that I hate jason; I just feel he can't get it done. As far as El and thrash we could cut even deeper.
Dblock804 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 02:06 PM   #10
charlielyons
Special Teams
 
charlielyons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 394
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dblock804 View Post
I agree, time for Colt. It's not that I hate jason; I just feel he can't get it done. As far as El and thrash we could cut even deeper.
i agree 100%....time for colt, kelly, and thomas to get chance,moss starting still though
charlielyons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 02:12 PM   #11
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by charlielyons View Post
i agree 100%....time for colt, kelly, and thomas to get chance,moss starting still though
While we are at it, why don't we bench Cooley, Rogers, Landry, Fletcher, Samuels, and Carter and see if Davis, Tryon, Moore, Blades, Heyer and Jackson can play?

We're still very much in the playoff race. You don't quit the race while you're still in it. To junk our best players so the fans can see how Colt might play against real opponents in the regular season is bats*#t crazy.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 03:14 PM   #12
charlielyons
Special Teams
 
charlielyons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 394
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
While we are at it, why don't we bench Cooley, Rogers, Landry, Fletcher, Samuels, and Carter and see if Davis, Tryon, Moore, Blades, Heyer and Jackson can play?

We're still very much in the playoff race. You don't quit the race while you're still in it. To junk our best players so the fans can see how Colt might play against real opponents in the regular season is bats*#t crazy.
after we are out of the playoff race, we should see what we have, not while we are in the thick of it. but now that you mention it yoder could sit down for davis, washington will most likely be gone..blades needs to continue to play.....jansen will be gone, heyer should be playing and a rotation with jackson in the mix couldnt hurt. colt brennan may not be the answer but no one here can honestly say the are not curious about what this kid could do.....whats the harm if we are out of the playoff race.
charlielyons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 02:11 PM   #13
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dblock804 View Post
I agree, time for Colt. It's not that I hate jason; I just feel he can't get it done. As far as El and thrash we could cut even deeper.
Obama ended up winning the election.

I say this because your comments that Jason Campbell can't get it done make me think that between Week 2 and Week 8, all sources of information went dark, and you were unaware of the monstrous stretch that JC was having.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 02:16 PM   #14
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,592
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

We need to judge JC after next year. Let's give the guy a full off season, pre season and the 09 season in the same offense and let the guy develop. However I do think Colt should get more of a look next pre season.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 02:40 PM   #15
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

We need an offensive line period, screw this non-sense QB talk (Colt Brennan? Give me a freaking break!). If you have a line that can protect JC, we'd be in better shape. Heyer and Rinehart need to come up to speed next season, it'd be nice to acquire a solid young free agent lineman and draft offensive and defensive lineman with your first couple of picks...as a matter of fact, our first pick in the draft SHOULD be a offensive lineman. We've seen JC play some damn good games when he gets protection and our running game is working. So the team needs to focus on the offensive line in the upcoming off season.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.22068 seconds with 10 queries