![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 886
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Quote:
__________________
ALL HAIL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,687
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Quote:
I know Santana Moss played well early when teams played soft & didn't cover him over the top that much... But Randel El was great? Thomas? Kelly? Thrash? huh? It's so funny that it's ALL about our O-Line... without anyone giving credence to the fact that really, the rest of the league figured out Zorn's SHORT WCO passing game and started playing much closer with their DBs and Safeties. I mean, does anyone else remember the shirt slant to Moss, the WR screen to Moss working really well ealry on beut never again after about week 6-7? Plus, the DBs starting playing tight off the lines, knowing our receivers can't get space on their own or get off of jams & that the would be running short-mid range routes... Suddenly, Campbell doesn't have big windows to throw into and the defense is closer to the line of scrimmage, taking away the 10 yard runs Portis was running off with regularity. The only game late where the opposing defense played soft was the Seahawks game. They played soft, no blitzes, and we were in 3 WR sets (especially the 2nd half) and Portis was getting CHUNKS of yards because the defense Seattle put out there facing a 3 WR set. The line wasn't so horrible that day... and I can tell you our receivers weren't great that day either.... Yes, our line isn't the HOGS of the 80's, but the are not a glaring weakness like our WR corp. Also... When I started the thread, I said that no way in heck should we draft a receiver any time soon, I threw out the idea of Houshmandzadeh as he will be a UFA. He's the only one I'd go out and pay for in this years FA class... otherwise, my point was, that we have to HOPE that Thomas gets smarter or Kelly has knee transplants... in order to see any real difference next year in the pass game (and our line will look "terrible" to everyone else again) ... lol
__________________
“Sometimes it is not enough to our best; we must do what is required.” - Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 54
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Quote:
__________________
Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Age: 39
Posts: 6
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
It would be absurd to draft a WR in 2009. We need to focus on O-line, D-line, and maybe a LB in the later rounds with Fletch getting older and MW falling off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Quote:
I agree, draft should go to rebuilding the O line, a LB, and a CB for depth. I do think making a play for TJ would be good though via FA. Guy is a gamer stuck on a crappy team. Trade Randle El if need be for more picks, but I think the idea of acquiring TJ isn't so crazy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Schertz, Tx
Age: 46
Posts: 3,224
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Quote:
randle el isnt tradable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
That stinks, didn't know that. I like Randle El, but he might be the only one that would be worth anything in terms of trade bait. I guess only by trading down we will get more picks, but we do need high round linemen, so there goes the more picks plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 48
Posts: 2,906
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
We could've used another OL man and one less WR in the last draft but hindsight is 20/20.
Don't use another draft pick for another WR whatever you do. At least not this year. TJ would be good if we can get him at a moderate price. It seems to me that the more money they spend on a guy the worse he does. I don't see the point in keeping ARE if we can get something for him besides dead cap if there is any. Last edited by Trample the Elderly; 01-04-2009 at 12:08 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
The receivers are fine. Zorn needs to find ways to better utilize the backs & TEs, protect the QB and develop either Thomas OR Kelley (hopefully both). They have much bigger needs elsewhere.
Remember how crappy the Falcons receivers were when Vick was their QB? Remember all the Vick apologists saying he had no one credible to throw to? Remember all the talk of TO going to the Falcons and how that would improve Vick's numbers? Well those same WRs are there now and look at what they did this year. Roddy White's a pro-bowler. What's different? Hmmm... |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,687
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Quote:
Are you saying get rid of Campbell? If you watched the Playoff game today they showed that their line gave up 47 sacks last year and 17 this year... and the line says its all Matt Ryan for getting the ball out quickly like he is supposed to. I think Campbell wants to get the ball out quickly, but doesn;t want to throw into tight coverage and get a pick. When receivers aren't open its hard to run a pass offense.
__________________
“Sometimes it is not enough to our best; we must do what is required.” - Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Our WRs in 2009... My Thoughts
Tj would be a great move, and I bet you could get him for a decent price also. He has to be tired of the BS in Cincy by now. At some point these guys do want a legacy, meaning a ring. He has no hope of that with Ocho Cinco and the oft injured Palmer. Marv Lewis sucks as a HC. Snyder did well in not giving him our HC position.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|