Some Zorn Story...But It Hints at Campbell Getting Paid

[GTripp0012]

For those who are interested, I have week by week DVOA graphs for the 2008 season up on my blog.

2008 Redskins DVOA Graphs - Hog Heaven

[redskins1974]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

and b/c you don't like Campbell.

um he ranks in the bottom five of the league for yards per completion. the guy doesnt throw down the field so of course his accuracy is going to be better.

its not my opinion, its a fact

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by redskins1974

um he ranks in the bottom five of the league for yards per completion. the guy doesnt throw down the field so of course his accuracy is going to be better.

its not my opinion, its a fact

But it's not his fault he doesn't throw down the field. He can't throw down the field without protection.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

But it's not his fault he doesn't throw down the field. He can't throw down the field without protection.

Or when his receivers are ranking high in drops. Specifically Santana, I assume that the majority of his drops were long balls that could have had a solid impact on his YPC avg.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

This means CP, on average, caught his 28 receptions about one yard behind the line of scrimmage, ran 8.7 yards, and netted 7.8 on the play.

Makes sense. He was the target on dump offs and screens.

Oh yeah that would make sense. You're so smart

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Or when his receivers are ranking high in drops. Specifically Santana, I assume that the majority of his drops were long balls that could have had a solid impact on his YPC avg.

Or even could have won the game against Dallas, a win which would have made JC look better.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Lotus

Or even could have won the game against Dallas, a win which would have made JC look better.

or the in the Arizona game, where a wide open Thomas caught the mid ranger for a TD, but there was the penalty.

So many missed opportunities last year. I am so optimistic and excited for this year. I think the Skins, and Campbell, have a golden chance to take the next step!

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

or the in the Arizona game, where a wide open Thomas caught the mid ranger for a TD, but there was the penalty.

So many missed opportunities last year. I am so optimistic and excited for this year. I think the Skins, and Campbell, have a golden chance to take the next step!

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by redskins1974

um he ranks in the bottom five of the league for yards per completion. the guy doesnt throw down the field so of course his accuracy is going to be better.

its not my opinion, its a fact

But still, you don't like Campbell, so any of your statements are going to be biased and just focus on the negative. I'm just pointing it out just as you pointed this out...

Originally Posted by redskins1974

Well I think his accuracy rating is inflated because of all the many times he threw a 5 yard completion on 3rd and 12.

[DBUCHANON101]

Tarvaris Jackson | Vikings | Interested: Redskins? Rams? Seahawks?
During an appearance on the NFL Network, Michael Lombardi indicated that he's "been hearing talk" that Tarvaris Jackson may demand a trade if and when Brett Favre officially becomes a member of the Minnesota Vikings.
Jackson, just 26, is believed by some to possess the tools necessary to become a successful NFL signal-caller, but has yet to develop those tools into skills. If he does demand a trade, a team that runs the West Coast offense would be the best fit for his continued progression.

Latest on ESPN, apparently we are not too confident in our QB IF we are lookin at T-Jack.

[DBUCHANON101]

Am I the only one who thinks its weird that the HC and the AC's go on tv and say how good the QB looks in practice yet we seem to go after just about every QB that hits the market?

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by DBUCHANON101

Tarvaris Jackson | Vikings | Interested: Redskins? Rams? Seahawks?
During an appearance on the NFL Network, Michael Lombardi indicated that he's "been hearing talk" that Tarvaris Jackson may demand a trade if and when Brett Favre officially becomes a member of the Minnesota Vikings.
Jackson, just 26, is believed by some to possess the tools necessary to become a successful NFL signal-caller, but has yet to develop those tools into skills. If he does demand a trade, a team that runs the West Coast offense would be the best fit for his continued progression.

Latest on ESPN, apparently we are not too confident in our QB IF we are lookin at T-Jack.

Tavaris would be at best a back up here in Washington. Besides, if there were any shred of truth, Mike Florio would be all over this.

Originally Posted by DBUCHANON101

Am I the only one who thinks its weird that the HC and the AC's go on tv and say how good the QB looks in practice yet we seem to go after just about every QB that hits the market?

Unless someone tells me/shows me concrete evidence that was going to get Sanchez, we've really gone after Cutler (as a true straight up replacement for Campbell).

The whole Tavaris Jackson is a pipe dream (I hope it is not a Danny pipe dream), and let's say theoretically they were to do this, I would hope and pray that this would be just as a back up. Besides, Jackson doesn't fit the gun slinger type that Danny goes gaga for. Otherwise, I think I would be just following college basketball from now on.

[MTK]

Sounds like Florio floating more of his turdy rumors

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by DBUCHANON101

Tarvaris Jackson | Vikings | Interested: Redskins? Rams? Seahawks?
During an appearance on the NFL Network, Michael Lombardi indicated that he's "been hearing talk" that Tarvaris Jackson may demand a trade if and when Brett Favre officially becomes a member of the Minnesota Vikings.
Jackson, just 26, is believed by some to possess the tools necessary to become a successful NFL signal-caller, but has yet to develop those tools into skills. If he does demand a trade, a team that runs the West Coast offense would be the best fit for his continued progression.

Latest on ESPN, apparently we are not too confident in our QB IF we are lookin at T-Jack.

I don't think you read the article right

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by DBUCHANON101

Am I the only one who thinks its weird that the HC and the AC's go on tv and say how good the QB looks in practice yet we seem to go after just about every QB that hits the market?

We have not gone after Jackson. The media just barfed some names in mindless speculation.

1) I don't see the Vikes trading Jackson, even if he demands such (which actually has not happened).

2) If Jackson were on the trading block, he is too erratic for Zorn to ever give him a thumbs-up.

3) Even if I were wrong about the above two points, Jackson would come as a backup, not a starter.

No offense but you are getting your feathers ruffled over nothing.