Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-30-2009, 10:28 AM   #1
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

What about the Colt? No one talks about him anymore.

The question is strictly for the cult following, not thread worthy.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2009, 11:04 AM   #2
murphy196
Special Teams
 
murphy196's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 165
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

I will be completely pissed if we draft Bradford!! The guy can't stay healthy and there is no comparison to him and Brees. Brees had a torn Labrum, which is an easy repair with surgery, Bradford's injury is just one hard hit away from putting him on the IR. Claussen looks like the most NFL ready QB that I've seen this year, especially if you want to take one with the first pick. I say if he isn't there when we pick, we trade our #1 for more picks and take a QB in the 2nd or 3rd.
murphy196 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 04:38 AM   #3
skins89moss
Playmaker
 
skins89moss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,634
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by murphy196 View Post
I will be completely pissed if we draft Bradford!! The guy can't stay healthy and there is no comparison to him and Brees. Brees had a torn Labrum, which is an easy repair with surgery, Bradford's injury is just one hard hit away from putting him on the IR. Claussen looks like the most NFL ready QB that I've seen this year, especially if you want to take one with the first pick. I say if he isn't there when we pick, we trade our #1 for more picks and take a QB in the 2nd or 3rd.
I rather take any other position besides QB with our 1st pick. 2nd round if we have to take a QB pick Tony Pike. Jimmy Clausen is better than Bradford.
__________________
I don't want us to draft a QB in the 1st round. We need a stud O-Lineman with the 1st pick. Redskins Fan Since 1972 SKINS89MOSS
__________________
www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam Flowers and Kukui Nut Leis. Great selections and best prices. Redskins Fan Since 1972
skins89moss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2009, 12:02 PM   #4
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,586
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

I've seen Bradford play 2 or 3 games so I really don't know if he's any good or not. But the games I saw he looked legit. Very accurate, got rid of the ball quickly, nice release.... but I think he was in shotgun just about every play. If we end up drafting this guy then Shanahan should just start the guy right away. No clipboard holding.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2009, 12:09 PM   #5
SKINS73
Special Teams
 
SKINS73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 190
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
I've seen Bradford play 2 or 3 games so I really don't know if he's any good or not. But the games I saw he looked legit. Very accurate, got rid of the ball quickly, nice release.... but I think he was in shotgun just about every play. If we end up drafting this guy then Shanahan should just start the guy right away. No clipboard holding.
I think Bradford is a decent QB; however, could you really imagine him taking shots from Demarcus Ware, Umenyiora, Tuck, etc...? He would really need to watch them play for at least a year before he is thrown into the fire.
SKINS73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2009, 01:34 PM   #6
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
I've seen Bradford play 2 or 3 games so I really don't know if he's any good or not. But the games I saw he looked legit. Very accurate, got rid of the ball quickly, nice release.... but I think he was in shotgun just about every play. If we end up drafting this guy then Shanahan should just start the guy right away. No clipboard holding.
He's in the shotgun about 45% of the time if I recall correctly (not unlike Tom Brady). The first option should be Okung if he's there. But if he's not. I wouldn't have a problem with drafting Bradford at all. Bradford is getting scrutinized mainly because it's the popular thing to do with the top QBs coming out for the draft each year. But he's very talented.

Take Bradford in the 1st, draft Charles Brown at the top of the 2nd to be our LT, trade into the 3rd and take Calloway to be our RT. I'd be fine with that. (and ideally we trade into the 2nd and get someone like Dwyer as well) I'd rather do that than reach for an OT in the first round, just to say we got an offensive lineman.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2009, 07:39 PM   #7
WaldSkins
Playmaker
 
WaldSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 42
Posts: 2,726
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
He's in the shotgun about 45% of the time if I recall correctly (not unlike Tom Brady). The first option should be Okung if he's there. But if he's not. I wouldn't have a problem with drafting Bradford at all. Bradford is getting scrutinized mainly because it's the popular thing to do with the top QBs coming out for the draft each year. But he's very talented.

Take Bradford in the 1st, draft Charles Brown at the top of the 2nd to be our LT, trade into the 3rd and take Calloway to be our RT. I'd be fine with that. (and ideally we trade into the 2nd and get someone like Dwyer as well) I'd rather do that than reach for an OT in the first round, just to say we got an offensive lineman.
Totally agree, we can not take a OT with our pick if Okung( and he will be)is off the board. OT is perhaps our biggest need, but why reach when you could get a quality starter in the second round. People act like if we dont go OL in the first round that our draft will be a bust.
__________________
"I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown
WaldSkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 04:47 AM   #8
skins89moss
Playmaker
 
skins89moss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,634
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
He's in the shotgun about 45% of the time if I recall correctly (not unlike Tom Brady). The first option should be Okung if he's there. But if he's not. I wouldn't have a problem with drafting Bradford at all. Bradford is getting scrutinized mainly because it's the popular thing to do with the top QBs coming out for the draft each year. But he's very talented.

Take Bradford in the 1st, draft Charles Brown at the top of the 2nd to be our LT, trade into the 3rd and take Calloway to be our RT. I'd be fine with that. (and ideally we trade into the 2nd and get someone like Dwyer as well) I'd rather do that than reach for an OT in the first round, just to say we got an offensive lineman.
If the best LT is not available when we draft then I be okay with drafting CJ Spiller, Eric Berry, Brandon Spikes, or Taylor Mays. I want a impact player at the 5th pick than will be a all-pro and a game changer. QB is such a hard position to project and they normally sit for a few years.
__________________
www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam Flowers and Kukui Nut Leis. Great selections and best prices. Redskins Fan Since 1972
skins89moss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 07:18 AM   #9
LandrySlice
Special Teams
 
LandrySlice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: AFGHANISTAN
Posts: 335
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

I'm rooting for Berry now, if Okung is gone, bring in rhe B MAN!
__________________
Don't tase me bro!!!!
LandrySlice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 07:23 AM   #10
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

I slightly prefer Best to Spiller, and McLain to Spikes but not sure I want any of them at #5
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 07:30 AM   #11
LandrySlice
Special Teams
 
LandrySlice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: AFGHANISTAN
Posts: 335
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

To further explain about Berry, the one position our scouts are usually spot on about is Defense, so why not get the FS of the draft to help replace our beloved Sean Taylor, and help get Landry back to where he was most effective. HAPPY NEW YEAR FROM KOREA!
__________________
Don't tase me bro!!!!
LandrySlice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 10:40 AM   #12
Daseal
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 8,341
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

I would be pretty pissed if we drafted Bradford that high. Do we really want a kid that has been injured most of the year and has possible shoulder issues? I believe when you're picking top 10, it's important to get the best talent out there. Right now I really want Suh, but he'll be long gone by our pick -- I'm leaning Berry now. Okung wouldn't upset me, but is he a legitimate starting LT in this league? If we draft an T around 5, it needs to be what is projected to be a starting LT in this league within two years.

Personally, he's questionable to me. I want Suh or Berry seeing as how, talent wise, they're probably #1 and #2 in the draft.
__________________
Best. Player. Available.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 10:44 AM   #13
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,044
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Hell if you draft a LT in the top 5 he better be starting from day one.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 11:03 AM   #14
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Hell if you draft a LT in the top 5 he better be starting from day one.
werd Matty
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 10:58 AM   #15
BigHairedAristocrat
Playmaker
 
BigHairedAristocrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins

two things we absolutely should not do with our first round pick are:

1) Draft a defensive player, especially a safety. The move would not fill one of our top 10 team needs and i highly doubt a safety would even be close to being the BPA on the board at 5/6 or wherever we'll be picking.

2) Draft a running back before our offensive line is fixed. Its going to take 2-3 years to really fix our line. Running backs generally are only productive for 5-6 years. so if we draft a running back that high, we're essentially wasting half of his productive career behind a dismal offensive line.

We'd be far better suited to trade UP to get Bradford, Suh, or Okung than we would be to make either of those moves at 5. I even have reservations about drafting a QB at 5. Any player drafted that high should be a day 1 starter and all of the QBs in this years draft are "projects." Not a one of them is NFL ready. If Shanahan is our coach, we'd be FAR better off trading our #2 for Leinhart than using our #1 on Clausen, McCoy or Bradford.

Ideally, i'd love to see us trade Campbell, our #2 (probably around 37 overall), and a conditional 2010 pick to Arizona for Leinhart and Arizona's #2 (probably around 52 overall). Then, try like hell to trade down in the 1st and pick up a 2nd round pick.

We'd have Leinhart and with our first three picks, we'd draft 2 OL and a RB.
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things.
BigHairedAristocrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.28200 seconds with 10 queries