![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
What about the Colt? No one talks about him anymore.
The question is strictly for the cult following, not thread worthy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 165
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
I will be completely pissed if we draft Bradford!! The guy can't stay healthy and there is no comparison to him and Brees. Brees had a torn Labrum, which is an easy repair with surgery, Bradford's injury is just one hard hit away from putting him on the IR. Claussen looks like the most NFL ready QB that I've seen this year, especially if you want to take one with the first pick. I say if he isn't there when we pick, we trade our #1 for more picks and take a QB in the 2nd or 3rd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,634
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
Quote:
__________________ I don't want us to draft a QB in the 1st round. We need a stud O-Lineman with the 1st pick. Redskins Fan Since 1972 SKINS89MOSS
__________________
www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam Flowers and Kukui Nut Leis. Great selections and best prices. Redskins Fan Since 1972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,586
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
I've seen Bradford play 2 or 3 games so I really don't know if he's any good or not. But the games I saw he looked legit. Very accurate, got rid of the ball quickly, nice release.... but I think he was in shotgun just about every play. If we end up drafting this guy then Shanahan should just start the guy right away. No clipboard holding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 190
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
Quote:
Take Bradford in the 1st, draft Charles Brown at the top of the 2nd to be our LT, trade into the 3rd and take Calloway to be our RT. I'd be fine with that. (and ideally we trade into the 2nd and get someone like Dwyer as well) I'd rather do that than reach for an OT in the first round, just to say we got an offensive lineman.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 42
Posts: 2,726
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
Quote:
__________________
"I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,634
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
Quote:
__________________
www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam Flowers and Kukui Nut Leis. Great selections and best prices. Redskins Fan Since 1972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: AFGHANISTAN
Posts: 335
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
I'm rooting for Berry now, if Okung is gone, bring in rhe B MAN!
__________________
Don't tase me bro!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
I slightly prefer Best to Spiller, and McLain to Spikes but not sure I want any of them at #5
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: AFGHANISTAN
Posts: 335
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
To further explain about Berry, the one position our scouts are usually spot on about is Defense, so why not get the FS of the draft to help replace our beloved Sean Taylor, and help get Landry back to where he was most effective. HAPPY NEW YEAR FROM KOREA!
__________________
Don't tase me bro!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
I would be pretty pissed if we drafted Bradford that high. Do we really want a kid that has been injured most of the year and has possible shoulder issues? I believe when you're picking top 10, it's important to get the best talent out there. Right now I really want Suh, but he'll be long gone by our pick -- I'm leaning Berry now. Okung wouldn't upset me, but is he a legitimate starting LT in this league? If we draft an T around 5, it needs to be what is projected to be a starting LT in this league within two years.
Personally, he's questionable to me. I want Suh or Berry seeing as how, talent wise, they're probably #1 and #2 in the draft.
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,044
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
Hell if you draft a LT in the top 5 he better be starting from day one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
two things we absolutely should not do with our first round pick are:
1) Draft a defensive player, especially a safety. The move would not fill one of our top 10 team needs and i highly doubt a safety would even be close to being the BPA on the board at 5/6 or wherever we'll be picking. 2) Draft a running back before our offensive line is fixed. Its going to take 2-3 years to really fix our line. Running backs generally are only productive for 5-6 years. so if we draft a running back that high, we're essentially wasting half of his productive career behind a dismal offensive line. We'd be far better suited to trade UP to get Bradford, Suh, or Okung than we would be to make either of those moves at 5. I even have reservations about drafting a QB at 5. Any player drafted that high should be a day 1 starter and all of the QBs in this years draft are "projects." Not a one of them is NFL ready. If Shanahan is our coach, we'd be FAR better off trading our #2 for Leinhart than using our #1 on Clausen, McCoy or Bradford. Ideally, i'd love to see us trade Campbell, our #2 (probably around 37 overall), and a conditional 2010 pick to Arizona for Leinhart and Arizona's #2 (probably around 52 overall). Then, try like hell to trade down in the 1st and pick up a 2nd round pick. We'd have Leinhart and with our first three picks, we'd draft 2 OL and a RB.
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|