Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Please Define A "True Number One" Receiver

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-19-2010, 12:07 PM   #1
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 54
Posts: 2,665
Re: Please Define A "True Number One" Receiver

I heard this same question asked to Pat Kirwin on NFL Radio about a month ago and he basically said the term "#1 WR" refers to a WR that dictates coverage.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2010, 11:04 PM   #2
mlmdub130
Playmaker
 
mlmdub130's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Age: 43
Posts: 3,238
Re: Please Define A "True Number One" Receiver

Quote:
Please Define A "True Number One" Receiver
someone the redskins do not currently have
__________________
"I don't think anybody should have regrets, especially me, ... You don't regret what you do in your life. If you do it, you do it for a reason."

ST21
mlmdub130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2010, 02:02 AM   #3
SirClintonPortis
Pro Bowl
 
SirClintonPortis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
Re: Please Define A "True Number One" Receiver

I think having a questionable coach in Hixon may have slowed the development of the WRs here, and is partly responsible for Moss's "lapses", i.e giving up on the route in the Seattle playoff game, which in turn led to a TC pick.

Now with McCardell here, we could have two beasts in the making. Thomas could be even better than Brandon Marshall--Marhshall's 40-time is only 4.57--and Kelly could be right on par with him, or marginally better because he's likely a better route runner than Marshall.
SirClintonPortis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2010, 12:20 PM   #4
SBprimetime
Special Teams
 
SBprimetime's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: State College, PA
Age: 37
Posts: 138
Re: Please Define A "True Number One" Receiver

I don't know about that. Marshall's hands are on a different level than Thomas's.
__________________
RIP Sean Taylor
SBprimetime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2010, 01:44 PM   #5
jamf
Pro Bowl
 
jamf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,427
Re: Please Define A "True Number One" Receiver

Quote:
Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis View Post
Now with McCardell here, we could have two beasts in the making. Thomas could be even better than Brandon Marshall--Marhshall's 40-time is only 4.57--and Kelly could be right on par with him, or marginally better because he's likely a better route runner than Marshall.

That Jerry Rice guy ran a 4.7, Thomas and Kelly will be better than him! They are bigger and stonger too!

Brandon Marshall is a 100 reception per year guy. He is unstoppable and an elite WR.

Thomas and Kelly are on par with Penny Marshall not Brandon Marshall.
jamf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2010, 01:50 PM   #6
SirClintonPortis
Pro Bowl
 
SirClintonPortis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
Re: Please Define A "True Number One" Receiver

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamf View Post
That Jerry Rice guy ran a 4.7, Thomas and Kelly will be better than him! They are bigger and stonger too!

Brandon Marshall is a 100 reception per year guy. He is unstoppable and an elite WR.

Thomas and Kelly are on par with Penny Marshall not Brandon Marshall.
That post was not about them being better. But of course, message board posters don't read sentences, they just look at the nouns in the sentences and then make their own sentences in their heads.

And actually, I read one report in which Shanahan was going get rid of Marshall in one way or the other during the 2008 offseason, but he got fired.

Sources: Former Denver Broncos coach Mike Shanahan planned to jettison Brandon Marshall - ESPN

So for all the boneheads who keep on wanting him, the coach who drafted him didn't want him anymore.
SirClintonPortis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2010, 03:44 PM   #7
jamf
Pro Bowl
 
jamf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,427
Re: Please Define A "True Number One" Receiver

Quote:
Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis View Post
That post was not about them being better. But of course, message board posters don't read sentences, they just look at the nouns in the sentences and then make their own sentences in their heads.

And actually, I read one report in which Shanahan was going get rid of Marshall in one way or the other during the 2008 offseason, but he got fired.

Sources: Former Denver Broncos coach Mike Shanahan planned to jettison Brandon Marshall - ESPN

So for all the boneheads who keep on wanting him, the coach who drafted him didn't want him anymore.
Devin, Don't worry about Marshall. You're not even as good as Eddie Royal or Brandon Stokley. Maybe we could bring in Freddy Mitchell so you can compete with someone on your level...

I'm more of an HBO guy...
jamf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2010, 04:03 PM   #8
SirClintonPortis
Pro Bowl
 
SirClintonPortis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
Re: Please Define A "True Number One" Receiver

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamf View Post
Devin, Don't worry about Marshall. You're not even as good as Eddie Royal or Brandon Stokley. Maybe we could bring in Freddy Mitchell so you can compete with someone on your level...

I'm more of an HBO guy...
Devin and Malcolm have more potential than Marshall. POTENTIAL, dipstick. I was not saying they were actually better, idiot, but since you REFUSE to comprehend that point and instead try to paint me as stupid, well, your actions speak for yourself.
SirClintonPortis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2010, 05:29 PM   #9
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Please Define A "True Number One" Receiver

Have mercy that female is smokin. i mean i'm happy for Devin...how could you not be, but the dude needs to seriously breakout this season. I hope he takes a break from chasing tail everyday to chase TD passes w/ Jason, Colt and Rex
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2010, 09:18 AM   #10
rbanerjee23
The Starter
 
rbanerjee23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,440
Re: Please Define A "True Number One" Receiver

that's a great point...Defensewins has described someone, who, if they existed, would be the most complete wr/tight end/hb hybrid in the history of the game. You have to let some of that stuff go. I mean, how many players can you name who are "great" at the 1,2 and the slot?
__________________
"Tough times don't last but tough people do"

-Mike Shanahan

HTTR
rbanerjee23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2010, 09:28 AM   #11
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,044
Re: Please Define A "True Number One" Receiver

Didn't Rice have a weird thing where he frequently changed his uniform throughout a game in order to stay clean?

Edit: yep found this little nugget

Quote:
While Rice is portrayed in a pleasing light, the book does mention his demand for perfection even in his team uniforms, changing into a clean uniform at halftime.

Jerry Rice, Football Superstars Series, Jon Sterngass, Book - Barnes & Noble
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2010, 10:23 AM   #12
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Please Define A "True Number One" Receiver

#1- I like Marshall but I'm not giving up a 1st round draft pick for him. If they would except next years 2nd round draft pick I'd do it in a heart beat.

#2- There were a few WR's on the open market that could have been had with as much talent that would not have cost us a draft pick and the team didn't even make a play for them.

#3- You want a top tier WR now you might as well go after T.O. for a 2 year deal with a 1 year out claus in case he becomes a problem. Opposing teams still have to game plan around him because of his height and abilities even though they are deminishing. That would leave the other WR's one on one or atleast one person open. All JC has to do is be able to scan the field which is part of his problem. Not enough time and lack of ability to see the whole field.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 11:18 AM   #13
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
Re: Please Define A "True Number One" Receiver

Devin: "Coach [Shanahan] was like, 'You guys really ran this!?!?' I mean...our formations were so predictable...the way we lined up. They knew what we were running every time."

Devin Thomas Sheds Some Light on New Mike Shanahan Scheme - Hogs Haven
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 11:23 AM   #14
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,044
Re: Please Define A "True Number One" Receiver

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
Devin: "Coach [Shanahan] was like, 'You guys really ran this!?!?' I mean...our formations were so predictable...the way we lined up. They knew what we were running every time."

Devin Thomas Sheds Some Light on New Mike Shanahan Scheme - Hogs Haven
It's amazing how bush league things were under Zorn. The system, the conditioning program, etc. Wow, just wow.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 11:26 AM   #15
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
Re: Please Define A "True Number One" Receiver

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
It's amazing how bush league things were under Zorn. The system, the conditioning program, etc. Wow, just wow.
Yeah that comment from Edwin made me cringe.
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.43829 seconds with 10 queries