![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Was going to mention that Matty.. you can't defend the bashing of this thread either.
We are last, we as fans really don't have any idea as to what this O is going to look like and how these players fit. On paper we look terrible at WR. We could get a few surprises with Armstrong and DT coming on strong to compliment SM then we have something to talk about. Galloway will be alright in this short stuff. Who knows... I just know the old guys do scare me, the guy who is out of the IFL is a big ?, small rookie man who has a fumbling problem, and MR Michigan State has had 1 good game in 2 years. So there is reason for concern. BUT me being the optimist that I am will hope for some good play out of all those question marks up top! If we are to rank them: 1. Dallas 2. Philly (very close behind Dallas) 3. Giants 4. Redskins
__________________
Just win. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
You gotta wonder why Thomas can't succeed. Guy is a physical freak, supremely athletic, and from Mich St!
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Mich St isn't a good contributor to good NFL talent. Lorenzo White was the last Spartan that truly excelled in the NFL. It seems MSU QBs are relegated to being Lions backups, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
At receiver being a physical freak is nice. However without route running, hands, and the ability to read coverage it's practically useless. The reason physical freaks go so early in the draft is because all the attributes listed that are essential to being a successful receiver in the NFL are considered teachable.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Quote:
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mt. Laurel, NJ
Age: 38
Posts: 353
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
I cant think of any offense in recent memory where 2 good tight ends has had a significant impact on thier success. I feel like if Cooley starts all 16 games then Fred Davis is going to have very little impact.
__________________
Hail Redskins!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Thats why you use one as a wideout and the other as a traditional Tight End.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
The Bears and the Colts come to mind. Of course it depends what you consider significant impact. In my book there are only a handful of players in the NFL warrant the distinction of "Significant Impact."
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Quote:
And i guess it depends on how you define sigificant impact. Because if there are 2 TEs they don't put up equally big numbers. Therefore the impact isn't apparent just glancing at stats. The impact is felt in the favorable match-ups they create. Billick 101: 2 TE Formation - Bing Videos NFL Videos: Week 14 Playbook: Brian Billick on tight ends Off the top of my head recent teams? Packers- Lee/Finley Bears- Olsen/Clark Lions- Pettigrew/Heller/Fitzsimmons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
The Cooley-McNabb connection
11:16 AM ET Chris Cooley | Redskins TopEmail This season, the Washington Redskins may run a lot of plays out of formations where both Chris Cooley and Fred Davis are on the field, per Rick Maese of the Washington Post. This double-TE strategy is based primarily on two things: the talent level of Cooley and Davis, and the lack of options at wide receiver behind Santana Moss. In addition, Cooley thinks that McNabb is the type of QB to trust his arm to get the ball into tight spots than his predecessor Jason Campbell. "I expect to get more balls thrown to me with Donovan and more opportunity in coverage when I don't expect passes than with Jason," Cooley said. Another benefit of using two TEs is making use of them as extra blockers in the running game. Although the Redskins made improving the offensive line a major priority this offseason -- drafting Trent Williams, trading for Jammal Brown and signing Artis Hicks -- it's still a work in progress. Having an extra body out there to control the edge will be vital. - Tim Kavanagh
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Quote:
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Springfield,Missouri
Posts: 463
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Well,at least Santana Moss feels the same way...
Santana Moss: "This receving corps is an upgrade from anything I've had here" - EXTREMESKINS.com
__________________
The 1991 Redskins team,is the greatest team of all time. Their average margin of victory is the greatest of all Superbowl winning teams! HTTR!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Quote:
) When it comes to player speak, just show it on the field. The rest is just PR bs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Gamebreaker
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,237
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Quote:
Exactly, the PR MS honeymoon is over now. Now it is show me the money time.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|