NFL Power Rankings

[Dirtbag59]

In a few more weeks, Mike Shanahan might wish he had kept Donovan McNabb. (Fox)

I don't get this train of thought. If the media is going to nail the Redskins go after the 31st ranked defense or the 24th ranked rushing attack. To go after them because of the QB just makes me think they're playing the name game. Lets face it, McNabb sucked last year, yet they're crediting the Redskins with loosing the version of McNabb that played in Philly not the one that couldn't convert a 3rd down to save his life in Washington.

QB play last year was met if not exceeded by Rex. Also keep in mind the Redskins went 6-10 with crappy QB play, the 31st ranked defense, and an anemic running game. As far as we know right now there is no dropoff at the QB position unless you're going by name recognition, in which case the Redskins have a huge hole in the jersey selling department.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag59

I don't get this train of thought. If the media is going to nail the Redskins go after the 31st ranked defense or the 24th ranked rushing attack. To go after them because of the QB just makes me think they're playing the name game. Lets face it, McNabb sucked last year, yet they're crediting the Redskins with loosing the version of McNabb that played in Philly not the one that couldn't convert a 3rd down to save his life in Washington.

QB play last year was met if not exceeded by Rex. Also keep in mind the Redskins went 6-10 with crappy QB play, the 31st ranked defense, and an anemic running game. As far as we know right now there is no dropoff at the QB position unless you're going by name recognition, in which case the Redskins have a huge hole in the jersey selling department.

What are you doing? Stop trying to hijack this hijacked thread.

[#56fanatic]

Originally Posted by dblanch66

So the Redskins are ranked at 29?! I know these dumb ratings don't mean much but to have teams like Jacksonville, Oakland, Miami, Denver, Cleveland ahead of us is just botarded.

NFL Power Rankings Preseason - National Football League - ESPN

Yeah well Jacksonville, Oakland, Miami and Cleveland may be better than us. Denver may be a stretch but for the most part I can't disagree with the rankings. Face it dude, we are not projected to be very good this year. That is the way it is when we are consistantly in the bottom 1/3 of the NFC and last in the our division every year.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by #56fanatic

Yeah well Jacksonville, Oakland, Miami and Cleveland may be better than us. Denver may be a stretch but for the most part I can't disagree with the rankings. Face it dude, we are not projected to be very good this year. That is the way it is when we are consistantly in the bottom 1/3 of the NFC and last in the our division every year.

Ah the joys of negativity.

[#56fanatic]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Ah the joys of negativity.

Yeah well Jacksonville, Oakland, Miami and Cleveland may be better than us. Denver may be a stretch but for the most part I can't disagree with the rankings. Face it dude, we are not projected to be very good this year. That is the way it is when we are consistantly in the bottom 1/3 of the NFC and last in the our division every year.


How is the above statement negative? It is the truth. I am not making it up, or giving my projections, simply stating facts and what "others" are saying.
Fact that other teams are suppose to be better isn't anything new. We are always picked last in the division, generally finish last in the division. We are picked to finished last this year again. So who cares really...this is the normal thing that happens every year.

Its funny how we have basically 10 or more years of consistantly losing, finishing last in the division, and no one ever picks us to win anything and when someone says that its "hating, or negative or whatever" Its facts. When New England is picked to win everything and be great is jumping on the wagon, drinking the coolaid or whatever. Here is the difference... They have been run like a 1st class organization over the last 10 years. Doing things the right way (or what they consider the right way) and have consistantly won for 10 years. Their best player got drilled how long ago and Brady was there, Brady goes down and Cassel was there. They build and do things the right way. So when a Redskin fan expects them to do the norm and finish last based on talent and roster I am Negative and realistic.

[SkinzWin]

I'm married to a red box so do I win, or at least get bonus points or something???

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by SkinzWin

I'm married to a red box so do I win, or at least get bonus points or something???

Yes...to whatever Mod is keeping score, give a +1 to SkinzWin. Thanks

[skinster]

I don't mind being ranked low. We haven't proven anything yet. What I don't get is how we slipped 3 spots after making significant roster improvements. There isn't a single position we lost talent on, but there are multiple positions we gained talent on.

[Chico23231]

This Power Ranking thread kinda got me thinking of not only redboxes but what the Warpath's Power Rankings would look like? probably something like this:
1. Chico
2._____
3._____
4._____
5....

Kinda like the espn's new qb rating of relevance, context, grammar, spelling, comedy, knowledge, and other things associated with winning. evaluation would be a pain, but we have alot of gametape. would be alot of mod work though

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

This Power Ranking thread kinda got me thinking of not only redboxes but what the Warpath's Power Rankings would look like? probably something like this:
1. Chico
2._____
3._____
4._____
5....

Kinda like the espn's new qb rating of relevance, context, grammar, spelling, comedy, knowledge, and other things associated with winning. evaluation would be a pain, but we have alot of gametape. would be alot of mod work though

I think you just made firstdown's hit list with this. LOL.

[mlmdub130]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

This Power Ranking thread kinda got me thinking of not only redboxes but what the Warpath's Power Rankings would look like? probably something like this:
1. Chico
2._____
3._____
4._____
5....

Kinda like the espn's new qb rating of relevance, context, grammar,spelling, comedy, knowledge, and other things associated with winning. evaluation would be a pain, but we have alot of gametape. would be alot of mod work though

grammar fail. and no period at the end too? don't boast about grammer and then be all poor and shit w it man, wtf?

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by mlmdub130

grammar fail. and no period at the end too? don't boast about grammer and then be all poor and shit w it man, wtf?

You past the test. +1

1.Chico
2.mlmdub130

[BuckSkin]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

You past the test. +1

1.Chico
2.mlmdub130

It's.. "you passed the test". Damn it man!

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by BuckSkin

It's.. "you passed the test". Damn it man!

that was flat out epic fail. hay BuckSkin, buy the way, our u supporting a TP pick up? Id give a 5th round four him to play QB.

[SmootSmack]

So no one's going to correct Chico on his sig?