Official Andrew Luck Thread

[musicmaster45]

I haven't sen tannehill. Moore and RGIII are good for us though because they are so consistently good and accurate. They both understand the game well and use that to their advantage. Hope we pick them up.

[Landry44]

Originally Posted by musicmaster45

I haven't sen tannehill. Moore and RGIII are good for us though because they are so consistently good and accurate. They both understand the game well and use that to their advantage. Hope we pick them up.

Tannehill is talented but I think he's to much of risk. RG3 has been amazing this season even in losses. If we draft a guy in the first round I hope it's RG3. I feel bad for Kellen Moore because I believe he is really one of the best qbs in this draft. His size and arm strength will keep him from being a first round pick. If we can draft both of them I would all for it.

[Mechanix544]

we might be able to get moore in the 4th or 5th if he drops

[Landry44]

Originally Posted by Mechanix544

we might be able to get moore in the 4th or 5th if he drops

If he drops to the forth or fifth round we have to take him even if we draft a qb in the first round. This guy is special and I think once he gets some time to learn the NFL game he's going to light it up.

[CultBrennan59]

I got a question for you skin fans


Would you trade future first round picks to get Andrew Luck, and if you would whats the most you would trade for him?

[redsk1]

Originally Posted by CultBrennan59

I got a question for you skin fans


Would you trade future first round picks to get Andrew Luck, and if you would whats the most you would trade for him?

Yes. It depends where we draft.

If we draft top 10 in 2012, I would swap 2012 first rounders, throw in another 1st in 2013, and a middle rounder. Don't think that will get the pick. I think it will be 3 first rounders.

[Slingin Sammy 33]

I see us borderline Top 10 pick. We still play MIA, Dall-ass at home, SEA & MINN. We will likely finish with 6-7 wins. Price tag for Luck way too high. I hope RGIII comes out and is there when we pick.

[Landry44]

Originally Posted by Slingin Sammy 33

I see us borderline Top 10 pick. We still play MIA, Dall-ass at home, SEA & MINN. We will likely finish with 6-7 wins. Price tag for Luck way too high. I hope RGIII comes out and is there when we pick.

The way we played today I honest don't see us winning another game. If we get the first pick in the draft I we have to draft Luck. If we manage to pull off a few wins then RG3 is the best choice.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by CultBrennan59

I got a question for you skin fans


Would you trade future first round picks to get Andrew Luck, and if you would whats the most you would trade for him?

If Shanny and Kyle think he is the truth and a future franchise QB that can run their system and be successful, then yes. Move our spot in the first and next years number 1 and a couple more picks in a package and get the guy.

[Landry44]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

If Shanny and Kyle think he is the truth and a future franchise QB that can run their system and be successful, then yes. Move our spot in the first and next years number 1 and a couple more picks in a package and get the guy.

I think that's a bad idea. We have way to many wholes on our team to invest so heavily in one player. Plus there are other great qbs that would be perfect for our system.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by Landry44

I think that's a bad idea. We have way to many wholes on our team to invest so heavily in one player. Plus there are other great qbs that would be perfect for our system.

I think the other holes this team has can be addressed in the later rounds and free agency. The Redskins need a franchise QB now that they have a LT, a decent line, and depth at RBs. So whatever first round QB the FO feels they need to get in the first round, they should do whatever it takes to get him.

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

I think the other holes this team has can be addressed in the later rounds and free agency. The Redskins need a franchise QB now that they have a LT, a decent line, and depth at RBs. So whatever first round QB the FO feels they need to get in the first round, they should do whatever it takes to get him.

do you mean D-line? cause I'd wager 9 sacks our OL needs some work.

[CultBrennan59]

Originally Posted by Landry44

I think that's a bad idea. We have way to many wholes on our team to invest so heavily in one player. Plus there are other great qbs that would be perfect for our system.

It's amazing how drafting a QB and hitting on the right one will make all those 'holes' disappear...



Think about it for a second. Our defense except maybe our secondary, isn't that bad. They keep us in games. It's our offense that doesn't produce. If you have the right QB, that QB will get the ball out fast and make the right protections. As awful as our OL played today giving up 9 sacks, it's really not that bad of an OL, IF you have the right QB behind it. Our OL IMO is better than the Colts, Cowboys, Bills, Eagles, Lions, Steelers, even the patriots. It's about whose back their to get the ball out quickly, eat up the clock (for your defense to rest), slide the protection, step up in the pocket and have awareness. No defense, no matter how good it is, is going to be motivated to go out on the field and stop a team that is up 23-0, when their Offense isn't producing. None!

[Landry44]

Originally Posted by CultBrennan59

It's amazing how drafting a QB and hitting on the right one will make all those 'holes' disappear...



Think about it for a second. Our defense except maybe our secondary, isn't that bad. They keep us in games. It's our offense that doesn't produce. If you have the right QB, that QB will get the ball out fast and make the right protections. As awful as our OL played today giving up 9 sacks, it's really not that bad of an OL, IF you have the right QB behind it. Our OL IMO is better than the Colts, Cowboys, Bills, Eagles, Lions, Steelers, even the patriots. It's about whose back their to get the ball out quickly, eat up the clock (for your defense to rest), slide the protection, step up in the pocket and have awareness. No defense, no matter how good it is, is going to be motivated to go out on the field and stop a team that is up 23-0, when their Offense isn't producing. None!

I completely understand how important the qb position is to any team. A great young qb can put us in contention for 10 years. But when draft a guy high and he comes in and get hammered his first and second year his skills are irrelevant. Just take a good look at Sam Bradford. Last year he was pretty good. This year you're not seeing the same player because he's supporting cast isn't all that good outside of Jackson. It doesn't matter if he's the right guy if you don't have the right people around him he will look bad. When I look at this team before the injuries we have wholes on the QB, C, LG, RG, RT, WR, NT, ILB, and CB. This team is lacking in all of those areas. One guy will not change that. Trading away future first round picks is never a good idea because you never know what you might need in the future. There are plenty of guys at the qb position in this draft that will be great players in this league. I see no reason to over compensate for a guy where you have other guys that can also get the job done.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Landry44

I think that's a bad idea. We have way to many wholes on our team to invest so heavily in one player. Plus there are other great qbs that would be perfect for our system.

The logic of moving up for a QB applies to anyone who Shanny deems is the future franchise QB of the team. Whether its Luck R

In regards to holes, QB is far and away the biggest hole. Unfortunately, QB is the most important position on offense.