80 Greatest Redskins

[mooby]

Why ask me if I'm the one who meant Larry Michael if it was Mechanix who got his name wrong?

[Leader In Sports]

Originally Posted by mooby

Why ask me if I'm the one who meant Larry Michael if it was Mechanix who got his name wrong?

My mistake. The first quote was to Mechanix and then I mistakenly replied to you.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Leader In Sports

My mistake. The first quote was to Mechanix and then I mistakenly replied to you.

It's all good man.

[Pigskins]

Who cares if his name has an s or not? He's terrible

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Pigskins

Who cares if his name has an s or not? He's terrible

You know where the "s" at the end of his name came from? Satan.

[rypper11]

Santana Moss

Joe Bugel

Ritchie Pettibon

Darryl Grant

Charlie Brown

Sean Taylor

London Fletcher

Chris Cooley

Jim Lachey

Clinton Portis

[Leader In Sports]

Originally Posted by rypper11

Santana Moss

Joe Bugel

Ritchie Pettibon

Darryl Grant

Charlie Brown

Sean Taylor

London Fletcher

Chris Cooley

Jim Lachey

Clinton Portis

Lachey was on the 70 list

[SmootSmack]

I'm not so sure about Charlie Brown getting in...but somehow I could see Bruce Smith

[los panda]

2000-present (not on 70 list)
santana moss
clinton portis
chris cooley
lavar arrington
chris samuels
jon jansen
london fletcher
sean taylor
michael westbrook
fred smoot

[Leader In Sports]

Originally Posted by los panda

2000-present (not on 70 list)
santana moss
clinton portis
chris cooley
lavar arrington
chris samuels
jon jansen
london fletcher
sean taylor
michael westbrook
fred smoot

Westbrook? Really?

[los panda]

Originally Posted by Leader In Sports

Westbrook? Really?

first game at fedexfield, why not?

[mooby]

Originally Posted by los panda

first game at fedexfield, why not?

I don't think players should get inducted into the Ring of Fame based on one game only. Or even four games only, hence why Todd Collins wouldn't be on my list. Sustained success as a Redskin, for a minimum of one season but a preference for 3 or more, would be my requirement.

[los panda]

Originally Posted by mooby

I don't think players should get inducted into the Ring of Fame based on one game only. Or even four games only, hence why Todd Collins wouldn't be on my list. Sustained success as a Redskin, for a minimum of one season but a preference for 3 or more, would be my requirement.

more of a stephen alexander kind of guy? nothing wrong w that

[Leader In Sports]

Originally Posted by mooby

I don't think players should get inducted into the Ring of Fame based on one game only. Or even four games only, hence why Todd Collins wouldn't be on my list. Sustained success as a Redskin, for a minimum of one season but a preference for 3 or more, would be my requirement.

I would think in the none WWII era it should be longer than 3 years. You think of all of the greats that came through DC who played for a long time as a Redskin.

It would be tough to put someone who only was here a year or two above a career Redskin on the all time great Redskin list.

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by mooby

I don't think players should get inducted into the Ring of Fame based on one game only. Or even four games only, hence why Todd Collins wouldn't be on my list. Sustained success as a Redskin, for a minimum of one season but a preference for 3 or more, would be my requirement.

Timmy Smith over Westbrook if we're doing one-game wonders.