Did Shanny Strip Haslett of Play Calling vs Rams?

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by Stacks42

Redskins give contract extensions to coaches Jim Haslett, Danny Smith

Remember, they also gave McNabb a big contract extension right after he was benched...lol

Originally Posted by aircoryell

But as we all learned, Haslett was given a contract extension. He's not going anywhere. We are they New York Jets and give contract extensions when we insult someone in house, a la Mark Sanchez.

McNabb got a contract extension too and he wasn't going anywhere either...oh..wait.

[aircoryell]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

Remember, they also gave McNabb a big contract extension right after he was benched...lol





McNabb got a contract extension too and he wasn't going anywhere either...oh..wait.

The contract with exercisable option after the first year? No one, including McNabb, though that was going to run its course. So that's a weak argument to lean on.

I just want to point out, coming from the other skins board, it's refreshing to be able to argue these points with others who are able to articulate their point without spiraling into name calling. I had moved idea adults watched football anymore.

[SmootSmack]

HogHaven, ES, WaPo,Myself...we all share about 95% of the same sources. and I think we've all heard different things in spite of that. I haven't heard that Haslett's gone after this year, though I know others have. I do know that Raheem has given the appearance of being in control of the D since he arrived but that could be as much about personality as anything else

[Defensewins]

Radio Raheem has more of a say in the secondary play call and in turn more of a say in the entire defensive play calling then the past Db coach. That is all you are seeing. No need to go into panic mode.

[skinsfaninok]

Here's a question... Does it even really matter?? Our d sucks anyway

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Here's a question... Does it even really matter?? Our d sucks anyway

I disagree, it's better than last year, even the secondary. The problem is Haslett not knowing how to adjust.

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

I disagree, it's better than last year, even the secondary. The problem is Haslett not knowing how to adjust.

No rak will make us worse than last year. I hope we get it turned around but I just don't see the talent in the secondary

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

No rak will make us worse than last year. I hope we get it turned around but I just don't see the talent in the secondary

Yes, orakpo is a big loss but a rotation of Wilson, Jackson and white will surprise. As for the secondary we have the same guys as last year, look at Gomes he's better, Wilson is playing better, meriweather is better than not having Atogwe or Landry, Crawford so far looks better than Westbrook. Our weak links are griffin, Williams and Hall. Hell, even Hall is playing better.

[warriorzpath]

I think the Redskins defensive talent is above average even though they have a few holes in some positions. Haslett has enough talent and enough time to put something better than what he had against the Rams. The main thing is - Haslett has to put the players in position to make plays because even in the Rams game, the players made impact plays when they were given an opportunity.

I don't think it's a good idea to replace him now, but there needs to be some sign of improvement in the Bengals game that shows that he can coach.

The Rams loss was all on Haslett with preparation, game-plan, and in game adjustments.

[warriorzpath]

I think Haslett let the Saints performance and post-game hype distract him. He needs to focus and also needs a Plan B and Plan C just in case Plan A wasn't working as expected. I don't think he was expecting Amendola to set a record in the first half, so obviously his game-plan wasn't working.

Another thing that I've observed is - Haslett's defense gets softer relative with when the Redskins are leading.

[TheMalcolmConnection]

Originally Posted by warriorzpath

I think Haslett let the Saints performance and post-game hype distract him. He needs to focus and also needs a Plan B and Plan C just in case Plan A wasn't working as expected. I don't think he was expecting Amendola to set a record in the first half, so obviously his game-plan wasn't working.

Another thing that I've observed is - Haslett's defense gets softer relative with when the Redskins are leading.

Would have been nice to blitz the shit out of Bradford eh? Would have loved to have done that, maybe gotten a few more turnovers and/or short fields. Not saying do that all the time, but maybe try that when you're up by two scores and see how it works? If they score on you quickly, THEN you readjust.

[warriorzpath]

Just thinking about it now and after reading John Keim's ten observations article on the rams game - I think it is the case where Haslett's strategy is to play softer defense when they are in the lead. In the article, Keim says that some players felt last year, the "rules" of the defense changed too often.

This may explain why opposing teams like the Rams are able to come from behind and win against the redskins. After it was 21-6 in the first half, the game should have been out of reach for the Rams - if the Redskins would have been more aggressive rather than playing soft.

[punch it in]

They are all professionals and so if it did happen i dont think it was with half as much of the drama that we all make it out to be on here. Personally i think they should just can his ass now and give morris the job. Wouldnt be the first time haslettusdownagain has been sent packing.

[RGIII]

Need for stability and foresight. I hoped this FO was different from the old regime.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by RGIII

Need for stability and foresight. I hoped this FO was different from the old regime.

Well being different from the old regime also means getting people in and around the team that know wtf they are doing.