Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Week 13: Redskins vs. Giants Gameday thread

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-05-2010, 10:41 PM   #1
53Fan
Franchise Player
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
Re: Week 13: Redskins vs. Giants Gameday thread

In a season born of change and optimism....the total suckitude of this team has reached epic proportions.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it!
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 10:45 PM   #2
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
Re: Week 13: Redskins vs. Giants Gameday thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by 53Fan View Post
In a season born of change and optimism....the total suckitude of this team has reached epic proportions.
How can a Skins fan look forward to the future if we play like this every week? It's a damn joke and DS needs to sell the team, a Drastic change has to be made to the organization for me to actually believe in them ever again. We had Gibbs and now Shanny and we still suck ass.. Yea shanny has to get his own players in but you can't rebuild with a OLD roster.
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 10:50 PM   #3
44Deezel
The Starter
 
44Deezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
Re: Week 13: Redskins vs. Giants Gameday thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
How can a Skins fan look forward to the future if we play like this every week? It's a damn joke and DS needs to sell the team, a Drastic change has to be made to the organization for me to actually believe in them ever again. We had Gibbs and now Shanny and we still suck ass.. Yea shanny has to get his own players in but you can't rebuild with a OLD roster.
And we'll never rebuild by hiring old coaches. This team needs to behave like an expansion team, but it will always be a patchwork job (vs. truly rebuilding) with guys in their 60's at the helm.
44Deezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 10:47 PM   #4
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
Re: Week 13: Redskins vs. Giants Gameday thread

I think under Snyder the one constant has been change. I'm hoping we're done with change for a while when it comes to Allen and Shanahan. Let's see what they can build and give it more than one season.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 10:49 PM   #5
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
Re: Week 13: Redskins vs. Giants Gameday thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
I think under Snyder the one constant has been change. I'm hoping we're done with change for a while when it comes to Allen and Shanahan. Let's see what they can build and give it more than one season.
It's just frustrating man, losing is contagious and my god we have lost alot the last few years
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 11:40 PM   #6
Texanskin
Special Teams
 
Texanskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Skins fan in the Dallas area
Posts: 187
Re: Week 13: Redskins vs. Giants Gameday thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
I think under Snyder the one constant has been change. I'm hoping we're done with change for a while when it comes to Allen and Shanahan. Let's see what they can build and give it more than one season.
Lets give them more than 3 full seasons to really put their imprint on what DS has so messed up the last 10 years
__________________
We are finally looking like a respectable opponent.....Lets keep it going!!!
Texanskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 11:00 PM   #7
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,595
Re: Week 13: Redskins vs. Giants Gameday thread

Not to turn this into another Haynesworth thread but I think the reason Shanny didn't let him play today wasn't another egotistical moment. According to this article it's not just Shanny that's fed up with him, it's his fellow teammates, including some of our defensive Pro Bowlers that don't want to be named (I have to assume Fletcher/Orakpo are a couple of them).

Since I don't have much to go on I'm going to assume that Haynesworth's sickness that kept him out of practice, probably wasn't much, like maybe a cold or a lesser illness, and he could've practiced if he wanted but obviously chose not to. I'm assuming along those lines simply because of what the article says about Phillip Daniels and how injured he is, yet he hasn't missed a practice/meeting/etc.

Not to restart all this Haynesworth drama but this article paints the picture that Haynesworth might not play another game for the Redskins. Now I doubt that, if he practices this week/future weeks, I think he'll finish out the season for the Skins and then get traded, but overall I wouldn't be suprised if him and Haslett are gone at the end of the season. I'm only including Haslett because of how bad our defense has been this season, like it's been bad on a historic level, and it's not just something that can be blamed on making the switch to the 3-4. Tackling has been bad, coverage has been bad, run defense has been horrible (I mean really, we need to just start wrapping up, that's all you have to do. No ankle tackles, half-arm grabs, grabbing a shoulder pad, giving a "bump" that barely causes a guy like Brandon Jacobs to stumble, etc.)

Now we can't blame Haynesworth for everything, I mean it's not like even when he's been in there we've been awesome 100% of the time, and we can't blame half-assed tackling on his behalf, but this is getting to be a bit much. It's to the point where I'm starting to miss lesser talented but obviously more dedicated guys like Cornie Griffin. I've actually forgotten what it's like to not have a diva defensive tackle on this team (And I actually never thought I'd use the terms diva and defensive tackle in the same sentence).

So Smootsmack, would I be right in assuming that's what all this "more behind the scenes" drama is with Haynesworth? And what's up with ESPN having a link up besides the Skins-Giants game recap that says "Haynesworth benched?" but the story doesn't show when I click on it? Tell 'em to get that fixed or take the link down.

EDIT: Alright, ESPN fixed the link.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 10:15 AM   #8
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Week 13: Redskins vs. Giants Gameday thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby View Post
Not to turn this into another Haynesworth thread but I think the reason Shanny didn't let him play today wasn't another egotistical moment. According to this article it's not just Shanny that's fed up with him, it's his fellow teammates, including some of our defensive Pro Bowlers that don't want to be named (I have to assume Fletcher/Orakpo are a couple of them).

Since I don't have much to go on I'm going to assume that Haynesworth's sickness that kept him out of practice, probably wasn't much, like maybe a cold or a lesser illness, and he could've practiced if he wanted but obviously chose not to. I'm assuming along those lines simply because of what the article says about Phillip Daniels and how injured he is, yet he hasn't missed a practice/meeting/etc.

Not to restart all this Haynesworth drama but this article paints the picture that Haynesworth might not play another game for the Redskins. Now I doubt that, if he practices this week/future weeks, I think he'll finish out the season for the Skins and then get traded, but overall I wouldn't be suprised if him and Haslett are gone at the end of the season. I'm only including Haslett because of how bad our defense has been this season, like it's been bad on a historic level, and it's not just something that can be blamed on making the switch to the 3-4. Tackling has been bad, coverage has been bad, run defense has been horrible (I mean really, we need to just start wrapping up, that's all you have to do. No ankle tackles, half-arm grabs, grabbing a shoulder pad, giving a "bump" that barely causes a guy like Brandon Jacobs to stumble, etc.)

Now we can't blame Haynesworth for everything, I mean it's not like even when he's been in there we've been awesome 100% of the time, and we can't blame half-assed tackling on his behalf, but this is getting to be a bit much. It's to the point where I'm starting to miss lesser talented but obviously more dedicated guys like Cornie Griffin. I've actually forgotten what it's like to not have a diva defensive tackle on this team (And I actually never thought I'd use the terms diva and defensive tackle in the same sentence).

So Smootsmack, would I be right in assuming that's what all this "more behind the scenes" drama is with Haynesworth? And what's up with ESPN having a link up besides the Skins-Giants game recap that says "Haynesworth benched?" but the story doesn't show when I click on it? Tell 'em to get that fixed or take the link down.

EDIT: Alright, ESPN fixed the link.
Well I'm sure you've already heard the talk this morning that he'll be released this week. Shanahan is taking on the role of bad guy, but really AH no longer has the support of any of his teammates nor Haslett. He's half-assing it in practice when he shows up, skipping meetings and overall he's basically quit on his teammates. He has a world of talent, but he's got to go. Along with Maake and Bryant.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 12:41 AM   #9
SirClintonPortis
Pro Bowl
 
SirClintonPortis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
Re: Week 13: Redskins vs. Giants Gameday thread

We were top 18 in points last year(as in 18th place). We've even eclipsed that low bar(we're 23th best points-wise) AND we're sucking in yardage given up as well.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness".

Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten.

The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan.
SirClintonPortis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 02:32 AM   #10
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Week 13: Redskins vs. Giants Gameday thread

We have a lot of poor performing individuals on the defense, and I think they overshadow some of the excellent performers we have had on that side of the ball. Fletcher, Landry, Rogers, Orakpo, Alexander, and Carter are all very good players for us. We have a number of contributing role players in Hall, Carriker, Kemo, Buchanon, Barnes (sky may be the limit for him), Wilson, Holliday, Blades, and Doughty.

You really should be able to build a pretty good defense out of that. But that personnel is not particularly suited to a 4-3 or a 3-4 system. And so we end up playing poor performers like Moore, Rocky, Golston, Daniels in roles they simply werent designed to play in, and we get diminished results because of it. It's not surprising, but we simply don't play a defense of good players even though we have more than 11 of them (closer to 15), and that doesn't even include Haynesworth.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 02:36 AM   #11
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Week 13: Redskins vs. Giants Gameday thread

I think the 3-4 is responsible for some of our pass rush woes, because it puts three non-pass rushers on the field in the down linemen sets and since you can't have those players in coverage, you're rushing three non-pass rushers every time they drop back.

The design of the 3-4 is to use those players positively to break down blocking schemes and create runs on the quarterback. We never try to do that. We just send a fourth rusher with those three and never get close to quarterbacks.

On the positive side, this is a much better zone coverage team than it was earlier in the year. But with no significant amount of pressure on quarterbacks via the blitz, its difficult to play pass defense.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.67158 seconds with 10 queries