Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-25-2012, 07:14 PM   #1
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

Quote:
Originally Posted by CapitalDefense View Post
Remember we are all on the same side here.
We all want the Redskins to win football games.
I don't want the Skins to win games. Suck for Luck!
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 12:36 PM   #2
mike340
Special Teams
 
mike340's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 69
Posts: 322
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

Sicken for Griffin?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
I don't want the Skins to win games. Suck for Luck!
mike340 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 10:31 AM   #3
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

Quote:
Originally Posted by CapitalDefense View Post
Remember we are all on the same side here.
We all want the Redskins to win football games.

You haven't been here long enough.


We have a few who don't.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 07:10 PM   #4
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,379
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
So many flaws with that post, but whatever. To each their own. Hail to the Redskins
Its all really opinion based, so im not sure about flaws? Only time will tell , i think we all agree that we hope this post is wrong - and if it is how soon until we realize. There is only one thing that is going to make this post "flawed". Wins.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 07:22 PM   #5
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
I don't want the Skins to win games. Suck for Luck!
Lmao yes!!
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 07:26 PM   #6
NC_Skins
Gamebreaker
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,737
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

You guys are debating with a dude who wants players in the Al Davis mold (aka..fast), yet wants to bring in Plaxico. Think about that for a second.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty
NC_Skins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 09:05 PM   #7
Bucket
Playmaker
 
Bucket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 3,881
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins View Post
You guys are debating with a dude who wants players in the Al Davis mold (aka..fast), yet wants to bring in Plaxico. Think about that for a second.
Yeah I don't really acknowledge most of the things he post's because I think he's being sarcastic. Can't really tell at this point.

Offense is being run the way the coaches want to run it. If you disagree with this, and think it should change.. Well, it doesn't really matter because while you're sitting at home eating dorrito's and posting on a forum board how it should be done. Kyle and Mike are sitting in a office going over game plans and getting the checks.

I agree with the way the offense is going. RG3 Needs to be mobile to be successful at this moment. It could change in the future, but i'm not going to argue with a coaching staff that is putting up the NFL's most points, and a crap load of yards per game.

Iv'e actually only seen RG3 take maybe 2-3 REAL hits this season. The others are just tackles, and brush offs. I mean, like he said.. This is football right? You guys are to candy coated from the care bears that have put the QB position as some sacred non-hittable athlete on the field.

I remember watching 10 years ago, and I didn't see coaches going "Okay, how can we make sure that Cunningham doesn't get hit more"..

He's our best weapon.. We need to use him the best way possible. If defenses know he's not going to run because we are scared he's going to get hurt. Then what's the point of having a weapon like that?

Fans are funny..
__________________
I need something to cheer about
Redskin Fan since '88
Be friends on Twitter! @thecasualhero
Bucket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 09:16 PM   #8
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins View Post
You guys are debating with a dude who wants players in the Al Davis mold (aka..fast), yet wants to bring in Plaxico. Think about that for a second.
and wanted Gaffney over Garcon.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 08:04 PM   #9
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,379
Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins View Post
You guys are debating with a dude who wants players in the Al Davis mold (aka..fast), yet wants to bring in Plaxico. Think about that for a second.
The whole al davis fast wr thing is funny. Hell it was the 49ers who bought in renaldo nee- a - my -a (couldnt remember the spelling). Its almost as if now fast equals cant cAtch in peoples minds. All the great players teams and things that guy did until his later years but the first thing people think about when u mention davis is fast receivers that couldnt catch. Lol. As for plax - hes probably still a solid redzone target but i dont know if i consider scoring a thing that needs to be fixed rite now.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 08:25 PM   #10
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

$25k fine for Kyle
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 08:40 PM   #11
HailGreen28
Playmaker
 
HailGreen28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
$25k fine for Kyle
Wow. Ouch, though I agree with fining profanity to refs, players should get called on it more often too, IMO.

Partially joking: Now can we start fining refs for some of the bad calls? Not just this season. Whoever called a penalty last season on Fletcher for hitting Brady when he wasn't even down, imaginary helmet contact at that, needs to lose that game check.
HailGreen28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 08:42 PM   #12
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,379
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
$25k fine for Kyle
Thats when you know you have made it in life. If i got fined 25,000 dollars id have to sell this phone amongst other things.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 08:45 PM   #13
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,379
What about bullychek
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 09:23 PM   #14
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,379
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucket View Post
Yeah I don't really acknowledge most of the things he post's because I think he's being sarcastic. Can't really tell at this point.

Offense is being run the way the coaches want to run it. If you disagree with this, and think it should change.. Well, it doesn't really matter because while you're sitting at home eating dorrito's and posting on a forum board how it should be done. Kyle and Mike are sitting in a office going over game plans and getting the checks.

I agree with the way the offense is going. RG3 Needs to be mobile to be successful at this moment. It could change in the future, but i'm not going to argue with a coaching staff that is putting up the NFL's most points, and a crap load of yards per game.

Iv'e actually only seen RG3 take maybe 2-3 REAL hits this season. The others are just tackles, and brush offs. I mean, like he said.. This is football right? You guys are to candy coated from the care bears that have put the QB position as some sacred non-hittable athlete on the field.

I remember watching 10 years ago, and I didn't see coaches going "Okay, how can we make sure that Cunningham doesn't get hit more"..

He's our best weapon.. We need to use him the best way possible. If defenses know he's not going to run because we are scared he's going to get hurt. Then what's the point of having a weapon like that?

Fans are funny..
Well just because we arent coaches doesnt mean we have to agree with what they do or the decisions they make. If your reason for saying that they are doing the rite thing is simply because they are coaches than i guess jim zorn and every other coach that has ever worked for every other team has done things the rite way. I happen to like the direction of the offense because we are scoring, but that doesnt mean others cant disagree.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2012, 11:37 PM   #15
REDSKINS4ever
Playmaker
 
REDSKINS4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,117
Re: Redskins vs. Bengals Post Game Reaction

The defense needs to get better. Bottom line. USC and Matt Barkley could torch the Redskins defense for sure.
REDSKINS4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.82240 seconds with 10 queries