![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Death, Taxes, and Samuels in the Pro Bowl
If Betts was doing this earlier in the year when they still could have added him to the Pro Bowl ballot he might have had a shot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Death, Taxes, and Samuels in the Pro Bowl
Quote:
Yup...if Rohomo was on ANY other team, he probably wouldn't get a trip to the Pro Bowl. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Death, Taxes, and Samuels in the Pro Bowl
If NFL Network isn't running, "Who is Tony Homo?" if his name isn't mentioned every other breath during even non-Cowboy games, he wouldn't be going, hence the reason the Pro Bowl is a joke.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,363
|
Re: Death, Taxes, and Samuels in the Pro Bowl
Chris Cooley C'mon I really like the guy and hey he owns our team but if you compare him with the other TE (because he's a TE discaised asa H-back) he isn't in the top 2
C.Cooley 45 rec 608 yds 5td A.Crumpler 47 rec 677 7 td J.Shockey 64 rec 626 7td J.Witten 54 rec 642 1td It's clear that just plai nstats both Shokey and Crumpler have had a better year and deserv their election I could also agree that Cooley deserves the first alternate spot more than witten. Also the S.Taylor comment he's a guy with a lot of potential but he has had a bad year he has taken a lot of bad angles has given up tons of TD, missed tackles you can't say he's having a better year than last year. You can say anything about roy but he leads the nfl safeties in Turnovers with 7 5 int 2 FR S.Taylor 94 Tkl 71 solo 1 int 3 FF B.Dawkins the FSthat it's going has 87tkl 67 solo 1sack 3 int 4FF And Dawkins hasn't given as many TD is that stat would be shown |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Death, Taxes, and Samuels in the Pro Bowl
Just a fyi, Cooley is officially a TE now. Saunders' offense doesn't use the H-back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,363
|
Re: Death, Taxes, and Samuels in the Pro Bowl
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Death, Taxes, and Samuels in the Pro Bowl
OK, then I choose McNabb. He's played in as many games, has more TDs, fewer INTs, and more yardage.
As for Roethlisberger, the only game he didn't play was the opener (he missed the first game, played most of the 2nd, and then was rested the final game of the season). So, he played in 13 out of 14 games, as opposed to 9 out of 14. That's a big difference. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Age: 44
Posts: 2,762
|
Re: Death, Taxes, and Samuels in the Pro Bowl
Romo is going to the pro bowl on the strength of his team. Vick is staying home for the opposite reason. If you compare the two INDIVIDUALS, then I can't see how anyone can say Vick is worse -- he's got 1000 rushing yards! Hello! That's three zeros. I don't care if he's a QB -- he's accounted for moving the ball the entire length of the field 10 times!
__________________
To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid, you must also be well-mannered. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Death, Taxes, and Samuels in the Pro Bowl
I didn't check but did Damon Huard make it?
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Death, Taxes, and Samuels in the Pro Bowl
See, if this was the case, why isn't Betts getting mentioned for the Pro Bowl? His past few games have been PHENOMENAL, so why not him?
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Death, Taxes, and Samuels in the Pro Bowl
Too late to get him added to the ballot, even then the backs in the NFC are too deep, Westbrook got shafted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,363
|
Re: Death, Taxes, and Samuels in the Pro Bowl
Quote:
You need 5 games as a starter to be consider and in those 5 games he ahs to show more and convince more people that the other guys that have played the hole year. Like L.Jhonson did last year in the 9 games he started. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 42
Posts: 937
|
Re: Death, Taxes, and Samuels in the Pro Bowl
Romo is the only qb that hasn't sucked other than brees and bulger, that's why he went. There is no one else, Vick never deserved it in other years, why this year?
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Death, Taxes, and Samuels in the Pro Bowl
I can live with TO getting snubbed. Sucks for him but when you act like an ass on a weekly basis you're not going to win many people over. Seriously, this guy is all about drama. He's a soap opera, I really can't wait to see him retire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Death, Taxes, and Samuels in the Pro Bowl
I think with a healthy McNabb, Romo still get's in. Yes, even over Bulger.
I'm sure he got tons of support from fans, but you have to consider his peers voted too. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|